Fair. But he took multiple days to hype up the story and said it would be huge and super important. As the interviewer, he should've at least vetted the 'expert'. As someone that supposedly cares about the health and safety of 'fellow patriots', he shouldn't have spent all that time hyping up something that, if true, was critically important to notify people of as soon as possible.
That critique is kind of ironic considering the type of activity that goes on here both through what users post and what the adopted figureheads of the movement typically do
Remember the National Enquirer now has more accurate news than MSM.
Stew is a mixed bag, but most is valuable info, and I have been reading about this young woman for years. MSM doesn't like anyone who tells about the tunnel system under the Getty Museum that leads right to the homes of too many "elites" and entertainers and underground labs to even list. Stew is right on the money with this one.
I'll tell you the simple reason I don't trust him. Because back in 2020 when all of the Q paytriot channels that had been built up since 2017 were suddenly evicted from Youtube... they were suddenly replaced in my 'suggestions' by Stu Peters, Patriot Streetfighter, Charlie Ward, Lin Wood interviews and a whole bunch of people talking about NESARA/GESARA.
Dozens of channels I was subscribed to dissapeared (some have survived on other platforms), but on Youtube it was like clockwork - a whole cast of "new" patriot truth tellers popped up out of nowhere in an attempt to replace the first round of truthers banned. Then it happened AGAIN a couple months later, after Jan 6 and they started banning anyone talking about voter fraud, and then again for talking 'medical misinfo.' But the first round of bans went to the anons talking about Q, before the 2020 steal actually went down.
Anyways, fair or not, I was always suspicious of anyone belonging to the new wave of Paytriots post-2020, and Stu is a star among them.
Good assessment. Clearly “paytriot”, but watch him because his positions are evolving like Alex Jones. AJ was controlled opposition by Mossad, allowed to talk about lots of stuff EXCEPT satanists pretending to be Jews. AJ strings cut with recent litigation and InfoWars bankruptcy reorganization. Looks like Whitehats are new “owners” of InfoWars and AJ to me.
Stew Peters financial backers are likely RINO establishment, possibly Bush family or proxies.
Thank you for saying satanists pretending to be Jews. They have been infiltrated just like Americans are. I would hate to be held personally responsible for all that the satanists have done with our money, in our government. But we had better take responsibility for vetting our politicians and voting system better than we have. It looks like this is what the Trump team intends to do. Stay vigilant.
Yes. Be precise about the pretenders. There are also satanists pretending to Catholics, Christians, and Muslims. And likely other religions as well.
But the “core” of globalists and bad actors are satanists pretending to be Jews, and the legitimate practitioners of Judaism are going to be pretty pissed once they find out they were “sacrificed” in WW1&2 specifically to setup this “shield” for the pretenders.
Worlds full of great Actors and Liars these days. Especially among the conspiracy circuits. So I wouldn’t be shocked.
I’ve been around the block a few times at this point, and seen enough people and self-proclaimed victims change their stories over time or after it gets pointed out another persons story contradicts there own. Sometimes drastically. And seen people who like to consider themselves as self-proclaimed geniuses swallow it up hook, line, and sinker. Despite the obvious red flags.
That I’m more then willing to admit I’m cynical, jaded, and maybe even a touch misanthropic at this point. So I’m not an unbiased audience. A small part of me wants to take her at her word. But the larger part of me wants evidence in hand, and not promises of evidence at some indeterminate point down the road.
At this point. My only real metric for measuring whether someone might be telling the Truth. Is whether they end up dead under suspicious circumstances.
So ummmm what's the verdict on this Stew Peter's guy
I cannot speak for others, but after the "snake venom" in the vax stunt - I think he is, at best a paytriot, at worst a clown.
That's not what Stew Peters claimed, that was what an expert claimed who he interviewed. He would have no way to falsify that testimony.
Fair. But he took multiple days to hype up the story and said it would be huge and super important. As the interviewer, he should've at least vetted the 'expert'. As someone that supposedly cares about the health and safety of 'fellow patriots', he shouldn't have spent all that time hyping up something that, if true, was critically important to notify people of as soon as possible.
That critique is kind of ironic considering the type of activity that goes on here both through what users post and what the adopted figureheads of the movement typically do
Remember the National Enquirer now has more accurate news than MSM. Stew is a mixed bag, but most is valuable info, and I have been reading about this young woman for years. MSM doesn't like anyone who tells about the tunnel system under the Getty Museum that leads right to the homes of too many "elites" and entertainers and underground labs to even list. Stew is right on the money with this one.
I'll tell you the simple reason I don't trust him. Because back in 2020 when all of the Q paytriot channels that had been built up since 2017 were suddenly evicted from Youtube... they were suddenly replaced in my 'suggestions' by Stu Peters, Patriot Streetfighter, Charlie Ward, Lin Wood interviews and a whole bunch of people talking about NESARA/GESARA.
Dozens of channels I was subscribed to dissapeared (some have survived on other platforms), but on Youtube it was like clockwork - a whole cast of "new" patriot truth tellers popped up out of nowhere in an attempt to replace the first round of truthers banned. Then it happened AGAIN a couple months later, after Jan 6 and they started banning anyone talking about voter fraud, and then again for talking 'medical misinfo.' But the first round of bans went to the anons talking about Q, before the 2020 steal actually went down.
Anyways, fair or not, I was always suspicious of anyone belonging to the new wave of Paytriots post-2020, and Stu is a star among them.
Good assessment. Clearly “paytriot”, but watch him because his positions are evolving like Alex Jones. AJ was controlled opposition by Mossad, allowed to talk about lots of stuff EXCEPT satanists pretending to be Jews. AJ strings cut with recent litigation and InfoWars bankruptcy reorganization. Looks like Whitehats are new “owners” of InfoWars and AJ to me.
Stew Peters financial backers are likely RINO establishment, possibly Bush family or proxies.
Thank you for saying satanists pretending to be Jews. They have been infiltrated just like Americans are. I would hate to be held personally responsible for all that the satanists have done with our money, in our government. But we had better take responsibility for vetting our politicians and voting system better than we have. It looks like this is what the Trump team intends to do. Stay vigilant.
Yes. Be precise about the pretenders. There are also satanists pretending to Catholics, Christians, and Muslims. And likely other religions as well.
But the “core” of globalists and bad actors are satanists pretending to be Jews, and the legitimate practitioners of Judaism are going to be pretty pissed once they find out they were “sacrificed” in WW1&2 specifically to setup this “shield” for the pretenders.
She's a great actor if she's lying.
Worlds full of great Actors and Liars these days. Especially among the conspiracy circuits. So I wouldn’t be shocked.
I’ve been around the block a few times at this point, and seen enough people and self-proclaimed victims change their stories over time or after it gets pointed out another persons story contradicts there own. Sometimes drastically. And seen people who like to consider themselves as self-proclaimed geniuses swallow it up hook, line, and sinker. Despite the obvious red flags.
That I’m more then willing to admit I’m cynical, jaded, and maybe even a touch misanthropic at this point. So I’m not an unbiased audience. A small part of me wants to take her at her word. But the larger part of me wants evidence in hand, and not promises of evidence at some indeterminate point down the road.
At this point. My only real metric for measuring whether someone might be telling the Truth. Is whether they end up dead under suspicious circumstances.
He has bad things to say about “qanons”
A little Stewey to me...