Weirdly enough I was talking to one of my friends about just this this morning there are now pictures of Michelle Obama pregnant on Google. Which I mean we know they're not really her just ironic
Well spotted. Just a general fyi for everyone else.
Ai makes everything overly smooth. It isn't good at the finer details like wrinkles in skin, or creases in the clothing. They always end up looking a bit like a wax model.
Also Ai faces aren't quite there yet, and it still can't recreate human hands properly.
In the first link zoom in on michaels hands. They have tried to hide it with lots of blurring, but you can still see the mess ai made of the hands.
The second link they hide the hands which is a lot more sneaky, but the faces still aren't quite right. Not too mention this ai Mike has a slender build and skinny girl arms.
I don't follow the pregnant photo argument much. There's not one pregnant photo from my mother's 10 pregnancies or the 12 pregnancies between my sisters and me.
I don't follow the pregnant photo argument much. There's not one pregnant photo from my mother's 10 pregnancies or the 12 pregnancies between my sisters and me.
That settles it then.
There also exist no photos of you, your mother, or your sisters with any child as a newborn infant, year-old baby, or 2- to 3-year-old toddler, either.
Not a single one. Right?
Pretty hard to believe. Still, I don't know you; maybe none of you has ever been photographed in your life. Maybe your entire family is just congenitally photo-shy. And that's perfectly OK.
I can tell you, MOST people do take pictures of their newborns and little kids. A few, anyway. (Usually, it's HUNDREDS. Or more.)
Not zero!
The fact that absolutely ZERO such photos existâof people with children and with money to afford a smartphone or camera like these lawyers, the Fauxbamasâis EXTREMELY bizarre and suspect.
But it makes sense, since we know who the parents of Sasha and Malia really are; we've seen photos of the girls with their parents (!); and they each are a DEAD RINGER for one or the other of their real parents, while looking nothing at all like either of the Fauxbamas.
Then there is a little tiny baby to take photos of
As the child grows, more and more photos always get taken of the parents with the child
WHERE ARE ALL THOSE PHOTOS
I just moved the "Where are all the photos" question past the moment of childbirth, to help you past the fact of your having no pregnancy photos and enable you to question, Where are the baby pictures of the Fauxbama daughters?
In this particular case the parameters of conversation, or overton window, is the pregnancy photo existence or nonexistence to prove MO is a biological female, and the girls are the progeny of BO and MO.
The overton window, or parameters of conversation, was shifted to include family photos of the two girls' childhood. Family photos are not proof of a pregnancy, just as no pregnancy photos is not proof of no pregnancy.
Perhaps I wasn't clear. A better argument than no pregnancy photos needs to be made. There are plenty of women who do not have photos of themselves pregnant. Granted, it has been trending for the past decade, but not before. Showing familial traits between the girls and the Nesbits (sp?) is far more convincing.
Agreed. Their facial characteristics are indisputable. My grandfather claimed he was born in double 0. My grandmother disputed it and said his mother told her it was 1898. He didn't want to be two years older so 1900 is what he put on everything. Born on the farm, no records, photos, or birth certificate.
Weirdly enough I was talking to one of my friends about just this this morning there are now pictures of Michelle Obama pregnant on Google. Which I mean we know they're not really her just ironic
The pics are shopped. Easy to tell.
Both those images now showing on google are obviously created by ai. Learn to spot AI paintings because they are going to be everywhere soon.
Image 1
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FsqxcQ9XoAIaGGc?format=jpg&name=medium
Image 2
https://ih1.redbubble.net/image.5054565884.0848/ur,mouse_pad_small_flatlay,square,600x600.jpg
Those were the same two I saw. Obvious fakes.
Well spotted. Just a general fyi for everyone else.
Ai makes everything overly smooth. It isn't good at the finer details like wrinkles in skin, or creases in the clothing. They always end up looking a bit like a wax model.
Also Ai faces aren't quite there yet, and it still can't recreate human hands properly.
In the first link zoom in on michaels hands. They have tried to hide it with lots of blurring, but you can still see the mess ai made of the hands.
The second link they hide the hands which is a lot more sneaky, but the faces still aren't quite right. Not too mention this ai Mike has a slender build and skinny girl arms.
wow, I have googled that many times before and usually nothing, now all of the sudden they have them. Strange indeed.
Don Jr just makes me laugh & laugh right along with him!
I don't follow the pregnant photo argument much. There's not one pregnant photo from my mother's 10 pregnancies or the 12 pregnancies between my sisters and me.
That settles it then.
There also exist no photos of you, your mother, or your sisters with any child as a newborn infant, year-old baby, or 2- to 3-year-old toddler, either.
Not a single one. Right?
Pretty hard to believe. Still, I don't know you; maybe none of you has ever been photographed in your life. Maybe your entire family is just congenitally photo-shy. And that's perfectly OK.
I can tell you, MOST people do take pictures of their newborns and little kids. A few, anyway. (Usually, it's HUNDREDS. Or more.)
Not zero!
The fact that absolutely ZERO such photos existâof people with children and with money to afford a smartphone or camera like these lawyers, the Fauxbamasâis EXTREMELY bizarre and suspect.
But it makes sense, since we know who the parents of Sasha and Malia really are; we've seen photos of the girls with their parents (!); and they each are a DEAD RINGER for one or the other of their real parents, while looking nothing at all like either of the Fauxbamas.
What has your rant to do with pregnancy photos?
LOL nice characterization
So here, I'll simplify it for you:
Pregnancy often results in childbirth
Then there is a little tiny baby to take photos of
As the child grows, more and more photos always get taken of the parents with the child
WHERE ARE ALL THOSE PHOTOS
I just moved the "Where are all the photos" question past the moment of childbirth, to help you past the fact of your having no pregnancy photos and enable you to question, Where are the baby pictures of the Fauxbama daughters?
Make sense?
Ah, I see. You wanted to shift the overton window in an attempt to bully me. fuck off.
What does overton window mean?
In this particular case the parameters of conversation, or overton window, is the pregnancy photo existence or nonexistence to prove MO is a biological female, and the girls are the progeny of BO and MO.
The overton window, or parameters of conversation, was shifted to include family photos of the two girls' childhood. Family photos are not proof of a pregnancy, just as no pregnancy photos is not proof of no pregnancy.
Are you sure thats what overton window means?
Well then maybe it didn't happen. You are just trusting your mom told you the truth, amiright?
Understandable to trust your mom because she earned it. Are you willing to blindly trust mike?
Perhaps I wasn't clear. A better argument than no pregnancy photos needs to be made. There are plenty of women who do not have photos of themselves pregnant. Granted, it has been trending for the past decade, but not before. Showing familial traits between the girls and the Nesbits (sp?) is far more convincing.
Pregnancy photos are definitely not a modern trend. Posting them all on social media might be perhaps.
Agreed. Their facial characteristics are indisputable. My grandfather claimed he was born in double 0. My grandmother disputed it and said his mother told her it was 1898. He didn't want to be two years older so 1900 is what he put on everything. Born on the farm, no records, photos, or birth certificate.
Naw, it's sound...yer pulling taffy to be contrary...
They publicly announced that the pregnancies used a surrogate.
So what? Where are all the baby pictures then?!?!?
It would be too easy for them to produce a photo of a pregnant Michelle Obama. Photoshop, and now A.I. All too easy.
https://nitter.net/patri0tcontr0l/status/1700159685028872620?
Be cool if Don Jr's "đ" means he knows Joan is still alive in WP, hangin' w JFK Jr, MJ, Prince...
Because Mike is a man.
WOW HEâS DOUBLING DOWN!
LAST WEEK WE HAD THE NOT SO COY WINK N NOD
NOW HEâS DIVING DEEPER INTO THE PREGNANCY PHOTOS?
HEâS CARRYING HIS FATHERS TORCH!
TRUMP = BIRTHER CERT
DON JR = OUTING TRANNY!
LOOK HOW HE SAYS âMICHELLEâ IN A MOCKING MANNER LIKE âYEAH ITâS A DUDEâ
WOOOW
Oh my just finished it he even piles on to the Joan Rivers comment insinuating âeveryone KNOWSâ
The way he says âlike yeah we all know itâs not a theory, Iâm more upset about the dishonesty and media covering for themâŚ.â
MICHELLE IS A MAN
WE ARENâT CRAZY
WHY IS THIS NOT PINNED!?
U ROCK DON JR!
I recently addressed this critical issue: https://greatawakening.win/p/17r9IO5Bbz/obamas-release-old-photos-of-pre/