Q had no shit maybe 2 posts that roughly mentioned Alex Jones company and then literally said “move on” as if it wasn’t really that important.
Personally I think Jones has his place in this plan even if he is ignorant to it. This site hates Jones but me and countless others especially in the military would have been asleep another decade or more without infowars. Jones has woken more people than Q…he has been doing this 25 years and right about A LOT of things. This site doesn’t like that because he claimed to know who Q was and then shit on Q….which also makes me think he said too much and was told to reverse what he said.
I’m hopping his Sandy book lawsuit is part of the plan. That shit would wake up millions or normies.
AJ tried to take over Q, he said he knew Q personally and even had him on his show. Corsi was making big bucks too on acting like he was in the loop. They both finally quit.
I don't know why people dismiss something just because a Shill says it. Even if they're truly a Shill. Even shills talk about things that are factual. Do we dismiss election fraud because AJ said it happened?
I dunno. I think the logic here is that factual and accurate information is factual and accurate, regardless of who espouses it.
HOWEVER, there is a BIG caveat that needs to be included. That is, that shills, disinfo, Controlled opo have ulterior motives that need to be understood and accounted for, otherwise the information becomes the subject (controlling) position, not the listener or reader. IN other words, even if the information is factual or accurate, one needs to recognize WHY this is being shared with you, and to discern and filter that out, so that you can correctly insert your OWN purpose for ingesting or taking in that information.
Otherwise, indeed, you are being 'controlled'.
What do you think, u/Papatriot12 ? Does this answer your question? (The point is not dismissing something. The point is being wary and cautious about WHY that information is being given to you.)
this right here is the issue. 90% truth wrapped in 10% bullshit, and the bullshit is always the juiciest - most likely to be remembered and repeated. credibility vanishes when you go around repeating AJ.
Well your response is exactly what is intended. Have that base kernel of truth buried way way way beneath all the kookified and diversionary and discrediting BS, so true believers can say "SEE? AJ WAS RIGHT"
Why? What’s wrong with infowars..
Q had no shit maybe 2 posts that roughly mentioned Alex Jones company and then literally said “move on” as if it wasn’t really that important.
Personally I think Jones has his place in this plan even if he is ignorant to it. This site hates Jones but me and countless others especially in the military would have been asleep another decade or more without infowars. Jones has woken more people than Q…he has been doing this 25 years and right about A LOT of things. This site doesn’t like that because he claimed to know who Q was and then shit on Q….which also makes me think he said too much and was told to reverse what he said.
I’m hopping his Sandy book lawsuit is part of the plan. That shit would wake up millions or normies.
AJ is a primer to Q.
AJ tried to take over Q, he said he knew Q personally and even had him on his show. Corsi was making big bucks too on acting like he was in the loop. They both finally quit.
Plot twist..what if Q was on his show. We don’t know who Q is. Kek
I don't know why people dismiss something just because a Shill says it. Even if they're truly a Shill. Even shills talk about things that are factual. Do we dismiss election fraud because AJ said it happened?
the logic of this comment is bafflingly bad
I dunno. I think the logic here is that factual and accurate information is factual and accurate, regardless of who espouses it.
HOWEVER, there is a BIG caveat that needs to be included. That is, that shills, disinfo, Controlled opo have ulterior motives that need to be understood and accounted for, otherwise the information becomes the subject (controlling) position, not the listener or reader. IN other words, even if the information is factual or accurate, one needs to recognize WHY this is being shared with you, and to discern and filter that out, so that you can correctly insert your OWN purpose for ingesting or taking in that information.
Otherwise, indeed, you are being 'controlled'.
What do you think, u/Papatriot12 ? Does this answer your question? (The point is not dismissing something. The point is being wary and cautious about WHY that information is being given to you.)
Q explicitly stated that Alex Jones is Mossad controlled opposition.
I don't give a crap either way ----- Alex Jones & company have presented contrarian information that has been confirmed elsewhere.
The show has some crap too --- but "Alex Jones is right" has happened often.
It's controlled opposition
True, there is great relevant info revealed. It's usually mixed with bullshit so you go around espousing it, then the joke is on you
this right here is the issue. 90% truth wrapped in 10% bullshit, and the bullshit is always the juiciest - most likely to be remembered and repeated. credibility vanishes when you go around repeating AJ.
Well your response is exactly what is intended. Have that base kernel of truth buried way way way beneath all the kookified and diversionary and discrediting BS, so true believers can say "SEE? AJ WAS RIGHT"
Do you have a link to that drop?
you'll be waiting forever.
just 2 hours...
u/#q2102
You're @GAW, so step up the digging and bread making expertise. No need for coffee and burger flipping experts here.
https://qposts.online/post/2104 ... Read, then click the link below the photo and read.