These people and their shifting loyalties sicken me. You see the same thought process in the LGBTQ+ battles and the war being waged against JK Rowling.
One of the main things we have been learning is that in nearly every situation, when asked to pick a side, the answer is "No".
In great part because the two sides we are often presented are actually on the same side. Hegelian Dialectic. Almost nobody on the "Right" or "Conservative" side talks about God, about Good and Evil, about Satan, and literally zero people in the public eye talk about the Synagogue of Satan. Republicans and Democrats serve the same masters.
The Dialectic aims itself, through its agents, at any 1: non-approved group or 2: dissenting individual to attempt to 'split' the entity apart (1: oppositional parties or 2: an alienated schizophrenic) to disperse any contention against Urstaat power.
Chapter 12: 1227: TREATISE ON NOMADOLOGY—THE WAR MACHINE
(p. 360) We are compelled to say that there has always been a State, quite perfect, quite complete. The more discoveries archaeologists make, the more empires they uncover. The hypothesis of the Urstaat seems to be verified: "The State clearly dates back to the most remote ages of humanity." It is hard to imagine primitive societies that would not have been in contact with imperial States, at the periphery or in poorly controlled areas. But of greater importance is the inverse hypothesis: that the State itself has always been in a relation with an outside and is inconceivable independent of that relationship. The law of the State is not the law of All or Nothing (State societies or counter-State societies) but that of interior and exterior. The State is sovereignty. But sovereignty only reigns over what it is capable of internalizing, of appropriating locally. Not only is there no universal State, but the outside of States cannot be reduced to "foreign policy," that is, to a set of relations among States. The outside appears simultaneously in two directions: huge worldwide machines branched out over the entire ecumenon at a given moment, which enjoy a large measure of autonomy in relation to the States (for example, commercial organization of the "multi-national" type, or industrial complexes, or even religious formations like Christianity, Islam, certain prophetic or messianic movements, etc.); but also the local mechanisms of bands, margins, minorities, which continue to affirm the rights of segmentary societies in opposition to the organs of State power. The modern world can provide us today with particularly well developed images of these two directions: worldwide ecumenical machines, but also a neoprimitivism, a new tribal society as described by Marshall McLuhan. These directions are equally present in all social fields, in all periods. It even happens that they partially merge. For example, a commercial organization is also a band of pillage, or piracy, for part of its course and in many of its activities; or it is in bands that a religious formation begins to operate. What becomes clear is that bands, no less than worldwide organizations, imply a form irreducible to the State and that this form of exteriority necessarily presents itself as a diffuse and polymorphous war machine. It is a nomos very different from the "law." The State-form, as a form of interiority, has a tendency to reproduce itself, remaining identical to itself across its variations and easily recognizable within the limits of its poles, always seeking public recognition (there is no masked State). But the war machine's form of exteriority is such that it exists only in its own metamorphoses; it exists in an industrial innovation as well as in a technological invention, in a commercial circuit as well as in a religious creation, in all flows and currents that only secondarily allow themselves to be appropriated by the State. It is in terms not of independence, but of coexistence and competition in a perpetual field of interaction, that we must conceive of exteriority and interiority, war machines of metamorphosis and State apparatuses of identity, bands and kingdoms, megamachines and empires. The same field circumscribes its interiority in States, but describes its exteriority in what escapes States or stands against States.
Chapter 13: 7000 B.C.: APPARATUS OF CAPTURE
(p. 427) We cannot, however, assign this schema a causal meaning (the authors cited do not do so). In the first place, the war machine explains nothing; for it is either exterior to the State, and directed against it; or else it already belongs to the State, encasted and appropriated, and presupposes it. If the war machine has a part in the evolution of the State, it is therefore necessarily in conjunction with other internal factors. And this is the second point: if there is an evolution of the State, the second pole, the evolved pole, must be in resonance with the first, it must continually recharge it in some way, and the State must have only one milieu of interiority; in other words, it must have a unity of composition, in spite of all the differences in organization and development among States. It is even necessary for each State to have both poles, as the essential moments of its existence, even though the organization of the two varies. Third, if we call this interior essence or this unity of the State "capture," we must say that the words "magic capture" describe the situation well because it always appears as preaccomplished and self-presupposing; but how is this capture to be explained then, if it leads back to no distinct assignable cause? That is why theses on the origin of the State are always tautological. At times, exogenous factors, tied to war and the war machine, are invoked; at times endogenous factors, thought to engender private property, money, etc.; and at times specific factors, thought to determine the formation of "public functions." All three of these theses are found in Engels, in relation to a conception of the diversity of the roads to Domination. But they beg the question. War produces the State only if at least one of the two parts is a preexistent State; and the organization of war is a State factor only if that organization is a part of the State. Either the State has no war machine (and has policemen and jailers before having soldiers), or else it has one, but in the form of a military institution or public function. Similarly, private property presupposes State public property, it slips through its net; and money presupposes taxation. It is even more difficult to see how public functions could have existed before the State they imply. We are always brought back to the idea of a State that comes into the world fully formed and rises up in a single stroke, the unconditioned Urstaat.
— Deleuze & Guattari, "A Thousand Plateaus | Capitalism and Schizophrenia" 1987
“The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”
-Lenin
That is an interesting perspective, that the "Urstaat", the Platonic Ideal of an organized society, is part of human nature. Primitive societies have divisions of labor, almost exclusively based on the differences between men and women, and they all have male leadership. Women cannot survive harsh nature conditions without men, they do not have the strength, endurance, or disposition. We are social and have fairness and justice built into our conscience, and building relationships to solidify those things is useful.
The organizers of the state are almost always those who gather more than their neighbors- initially by virtue of excellence- but then are replaced by those who hoard through lying, cheating, stealing, intimidating, and murdering, followed by the corrupt hoarders setting up a system to protect themselves from retribution. Benevolent kings last as long as their own lifespans and are usually replaced by covetous murderous descendants within a few generations, particularly if rulership is passed down by birthright and not selected because of strength and leadership.
The left and the right were supposed to be on the same side with different beliefs on how to succeed. The problem isn't necessarily that they're on the same side, it's that they're evil, putting on a front to manipulate and divide people, and shifting the focus away entirely from things that matter in order to enact their personal agendas.
So, he thought the BLM crowd was Pro - J_ews? Where did he get that idea? Just because J_ewish George Soros formed and funded BLM and Antifa, trained them in Marxist ideology, and created Burn, Loot and Murder to divide the populace, destroy America and cause chaos and mayhem, doesn't mean they feel any allegiance to their sponsors. What a dope.
Was wondering what finally changed his mind then noticed that little star. He didn't get redpilled he's just being tribal since BLM backs Hamas.
the salt mine is great
These people and their shifting loyalties sicken me. You see the same thought process in the LGBTQ+ battles and the war being waged against JK Rowling.
Lmaooooo. Marxist vs Zionist. Leave the rest of us out of it. When I’m forced to pick a side I tend to hate both sides making me pick.
One of the main things we have been learning is that in nearly every situation, when asked to pick a side, the answer is "No".
In great part because the two sides we are often presented are actually on the same side. Hegelian Dialectic. Almost nobody on the "Right" or "Conservative" side talks about God, about Good and Evil, about Satan, and literally zero people in the public eye talk about the Synagogue of Satan. Republicans and Democrats serve the same masters.
Very good point.
The Dialectic aims itself, through its agents, at any 1: non-approved group or 2: dissenting individual to attempt to 'split' the entity apart (1: oppositional parties or 2: an alienated schizophrenic) to disperse any contention against Urstaat power.
Chapter 12: 1227: TREATISE ON NOMADOLOGY—THE WAR MACHINE
Chapter 13: 7000 B.C.: APPARATUS OF CAPTURE
— Deleuze & Guattari, "A Thousand Plateaus | Capitalism and Schizophrenia" 1987
“The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” -Lenin
That is an interesting perspective, that the "Urstaat", the Platonic Ideal of an organized society, is part of human nature. Primitive societies have divisions of labor, almost exclusively based on the differences between men and women, and they all have male leadership. Women cannot survive harsh nature conditions without men, they do not have the strength, endurance, or disposition. We are social and have fairness and justice built into our conscience, and building relationships to solidify those things is useful.
The organizers of the state are almost always those who gather more than their neighbors- initially by virtue of excellence- but then are replaced by those who hoard through lying, cheating, stealing, intimidating, and murdering, followed by the corrupt hoarders setting up a system to protect themselves from retribution. Benevolent kings last as long as their own lifespans and are usually replaced by covetous murderous descendants within a few generations, particularly if rulership is passed down by birthright and not selected because of strength and leadership.
The left and the right were supposed to be on the same side with different beliefs on how to succeed. The problem isn't necessarily that they're on the same side, it's that they're evil, putting on a front to manipulate and divide people, and shifting the focus away entirely from things that matter in order to enact their personal agendas.
Be glad you took the little red pills. Everyone still asleep will be recieving mandatory Big Mike-sized supositories from now on.
I can’t imagine this guy took the red pill. He’s just lashing out because BLM isn’t useful to him or his case at this moment.
They had a chance to pop the smaller ones in their mouths but noooooooo
So, he thought the BLM crowd was Pro - J_ews? Where did he get that idea? Just because J_ewish George Soros formed and funded BLM and Antifa, trained them in Marxist ideology, and created Burn, Loot and Murder to divide the populace, destroy America and cause chaos and mayhem, doesn't mean they feel any allegiance to their sponsors. What a dope.
don't forget to pay your $8 Weissman
LOL seeing these always makes me happy, thanks
The tribe is strong with this one
His very name is "white man" lol
Weissman
Any way the wind blows