Sharyl Atkidson tells Gaetz FBI was going too. PLANT CHILD PORN on her husbands computer! She had an FBI agent tell her they have done that
(twitter.com)
🚔 Crime & Democrats 💸
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (56)
sorted by:
All cyber crimes laws need to be rewritten to include mandatory forensic analysis, down to the machine code level or something, to show EXACTLY how illegal files are put on a computer, or network packets travel in a hack, etc, because it's probably pretty easy to wrongfully convict someone who isn't wealthy over a cyber crime.
"Oh, this file was on YOUR device, you are guilty!" or "This hack came from YOUR IP, guilty!"
edited in light of 40000's comment
Forensic evidence isn't going to cut it.
Why?
Because the government has backdoors at the hardware level (you can't convince me this isn't where CPU vulnerabilities weren't in play, for example. Also: see iOS backdoors) they can make anything happen the way they are fit.
Indeed, we know for a fact that the CIA has tools that can not only hide their presence in a cyber attack, but even misdirect and frame foreign nations.
It's simply very difficult to trust that sort of stuff on a drive nowadays unless corroborated by the users' actions, e.g. they are caught sneaking near children, participating in the creation of such repulsive content or selling/kidnapping children.
It's not good. It is definitely used to suppress voices they don't want, as obviously people passionate about protecting children and their innocence will jump down their throats if they are so much as accused.
Fuck. What do you think the solution could be??
You can't imprison people for possession of child porn since it's too easy to fake.
Instead, imprison people for molesting children, or making child porn, or soliciting kids for sex. Or even (maybe) for distributing child porn. But mere possession can't be a crime because it's too easy to abuse.
I think the simplest way to deal with it is to use it as a supplementary charge, something that reinforces the other child abuse charges that they're accused of.
E.g. if someone is accused of child abuse, investigation could yield possession of it and then it could be used to reinforce the allegations of abuse.
It will still be possible to abuse by unsavories, but much less likely and will raise the bar and make it both more difficult to fight and more believable to begin with.
Ah. Yea. Meltdown and Spectre. The "vulnerabilities" that Intel "found" after selling 6 generations of CPU with them. My theory is they do this on purpose, and then if someone finds it Intel (AMD etc) go "oh wow that's terrible we will fix that right up!" and then replace it with a new backdoor.
That's exactly the kind of total surveillance law the Establishment wants passed.
You can fight it in court?? Are you offering to pay for the legal bills of those wrongfully charged. This could ruin someone financially as well as strip their freedom. Asking for an independent device audit of all those charged with these kind of crimes should not be a problem for those interested in justice, one way or another.
Right. And there's no such thing thing as a heart attack gun, masks worked, the vaxx prevented COVID, Biden really got 80 million votes in the most secure election ever, men can be women by mere admission and the government doesnt have any special tech that we the people dont have access to as well.
Now lets take a break to get some more Kool Aid and go have the TV tell us what else to think.
I obviously cant just rattle off cases, because they were convicted... furthermore, to fight it in court properly with forensics experts and such would cost a pretty penny, so unless you are wealthy that option would sadly be hard to achieve.
I'm just thinking within a logical hypothetical framework, I'll admit
It's easier and cheaper to pay a digital crime syndicate to plant similar material on the judge (or jury members') devices and subsequently blackmail THEM.
You must keep patriotism hidden, or you will be targeted. As far as "the system" is concerned you must be above reproach.
It's a hard balancing act.
That sounds quite dasting... got any links?
So you are saying the poor currently have access to free forensic experts when charged in court?
Its hard to tell with that BS answer.
like we would hear of the ones who are innocent.
I'm sure the legal system has never gotten it wrong.
Tell us more about this database and our access to it...