The bill, H. 4135, passed the state’s House on October 18 with a vote of 120–38.
According to a report from the Epoch Times, the bill “would mandate that key gun components be serialized and registered with the state, it proposes an enhanced system to curtail the flow of illegal guns into the state, and it seeks to modernize the existing firearm registration system. It would also expand the state’s ban on assault weapons by prohibiting the purchase of AR-15-style weapons and would ban the conversion of a legal firearm into an illegal automatic weapon.”
The bill would also outlaw having a gun while intoxicated and ban firing them near homes. Additionally, it will prohibit guns from polling places, schools, and all government buildings.
The proposed legislation will also expand “red flag” laws in the state, which allows a judge to remove someone’s right to own a firearm if they are a risk to themselves or others.
The National Rifle Association of America-Institute for Legislative Action has strongly opposed the bill and is urging supporters to contact their state senators to express their thoughts on the bill.
“H. 4135 re-writes gun laws in the Commonwealth and imposes unprecedented gun control. This is an ominous bill that includes the worst anti-gun legislation in the country,” the organization said in a statement obtained by the Epoch Times.
Massachusetts Rep. Ronald Mariano said that the bill is in response to the Supreme Court expanding Second Amendment rights.
“The comprehensive gun safety reform legislation that the House passed today will make Massachusetts residents safer, and will further strengthen the Commonwealth’s status as a national leader in the effort to combat gun violence,” Mariano wrote on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.
These constitution hating politicians will not stop till they are thrown out of office.
And they will keep coming back until we deliver divine punishment for their brazen violation of their oath of office
The reckoning days are very near.
The SC, "Supreme Court expanding Second Amendment rights" is BS.
They removed"unlawfully imposed restrictions" if anything.
What does Massachusetts, Arizona, and Georgia have in common?
All three are hotbeds for TDS, and commies that hate the Constitution.
What else?
Well McStain died of cancer (executed), Elijah Cummings died of cancer, John Lewis died of cancer. If memory serves me right one or both of those crooks was also wearing a boot, and I'd say the odds are fairly good they died of the same cancer that killed McStain.
Those still in power in all the Trump hating shitholes are fighting as hard as they can to stay alive. They are not going to give up. They will have to be taken down.
If there were real administrators of civil courts in the stead of 'judges', owners could sue for clear violation of the constitution.
'Shall not infringe' wasn't a suggestion left to the state.
Before the hangings start, all the traitors must be identified and well known to prevent them from escaping and accusing others of the crimes they committed.
We won't be fooled again
does no good to even contact our reps, they are all dems and dont listen anyway.
Sad but true.
You will however get a paragraph of virtue signalling where they will tell you they are against the same things as you are in the most flowery language, while everyone knows that at the same time they are doing exactly the opposite of what they say, so thank you and if you have any other concerns please feel free to contact us again blah blah blah, goodbye. Oh, and send money, we are fighting so hard for you.
California’s law was overturned, that will probably work for Massachusetts too. Link: https://greatawakening.win/p/17rSsZ084m/big-federal-judge-benitez-overtu/c/
Gavin Newsom enters the chat.
SCOTUS will say its not Constitutional and throw out laws based Bill H. 4135.
These politicians need to be fired and made to pay restitution to the courts. Period. That would end this bs real quick.
Agree
The Commie Dem even admits that this law s going against a SCOTUS decision so he knows it's unconstitutional from the beginning.
But since nothing ever happens to legislators that pass unconstitutional laws, they knowingly do it over and over again.
I read that and thought the same. They now just knowingly break the law and go against the constitution (and their oath of office, if they ever took the oath!).
Exposure is the only way looks like with the state politician swamp creatures. Same with Wash DC swamp. The people have to see it to believe it.
2 words:
Un.
Constitutional.
I wouldn't expect Massatwoshits to be any different than anywhere else. Millions of people slowly being drowned by a few.
Complete violation of our civil liberties / constitutional rights …. They will do this and then raise taxes for the right and privilege to register your gun in pieces!
These people need to be removed from office ALL OF THEM!! They don’t believe or uphold the Constitution - this alone is enough to remove all 120 House Reps who voted for this BS bill….
All this will do is make a more robust ‘black market’ / Ghost Guns will become the norm …
Seems to be a problem if one takes an oath. Section 24. Every commissioned officer, before entering upon the performance of official duties or exercising any command, shall take and subscribe the following oath and declaration:
I, , do solemnly swear that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the commonwealth of Massachusetts, and will support the constitution thereof and the constitution of the United States, that I will obey the lawful orders of all my superior officers, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent on me as ___ according to the best of my ability and understanding, agreeably to the rules and regulations of the constitution and the laws of the commonwealth and the United States. So help me, God.
All officers shall take and subscribe the said oath before any competent authority or an officer qualified under section 81 to administer oaths, except retired officers and aides-de-camp of the commander-in-chief who may take said oath before any competent authority. The following certificate shall be printed on every commission and shall be signed by the person before whom the officer is qualified:
This may certify that , commissioned as within on this ___ day of , A.D., ___ personally appeared and took and subscribed the oaths required by the constitution and laws of this commonwealth and by a law of the United States, as qualification for the discharge of official duties.
Before me, . https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleV/Chapter33/Section24#:~:text=I%2C%20%2C%20do%20solemnly%20swear%20that,and%20impartially%20discharge%20and%20perform