Secret Warnings About Wuhan Research Predated the Pandemic (THIS IS BIG, FROM VANITY FAIR)
(www.vanityfair.com)
SUDDENLY Puzzle Pieces 🦠
Comments (33)
sorted by:
No one is in GITMO yet because of this.
Just like the list of Epstein clients, right?
yep just like that. We are in serious trouble. I don't care if I'm called a doomer or whatever, nothing is happening at all. Yes we have some low level farts being hung out to dry but that's it. We have people in solitary for waving a flag at the Capital. We have 15-20 million new illegals collecting 2000K+ per month, we have the same criminals revolving right back out to the streets dozens of times, we have small mom and pops being harassed by the IRS and on and on and on and on....and then to top it all off we have a Congress/President hell bent on starting WWIII with their Israel First and only first policy.
Not only a doomer but willfully blind.
This
This is nothing but a Limited Hangout article. It says, "there are issues with virus research," but states several times that "these are not the droids you're looking for."
For example:
Nope, the gain of function research into the bat zoonotic coronavirus funded by Fauci at the WIV most certainly was NOT related to bat zoonotic coronavirus with the exact gains of function the research was looking into that started a pandemic a couple miles away from the WIV.
Whew. I was worried for a second. Thank god for honest reporting.
They make it perfectly clear:
Yup, bad stuff, irresponsible people, but really, there is nothing to see here.
It's almost like it was written by the C_A.
But of course we all know that never happens.
Of course, no no, you can't think we would do something like this.
I should note the article does give lots of interesting statements that are worth digging into further. Nothing much substantive on it's own however.
Thanks for the summary, however, I think this is a way to slowly break it to the normies. If they came out & said it without those false 'disclaimers' those journalist would have lost their jobs & the editor would never have it released. So even though it's absurdly lame, it might get some normies to scratch their head & opens the door to the real truth at some point.
Maybe, except my investigation has shown thousands of articles exactly like this. This is exactly what a limited hangout looks like. If this is "breaking in the normies," why didn't the thousands of articles exactly like this one going back through history "break in" all of those normies?
The only way to break the programming for certain is to show actual primary evidence (the stuff, straight from the source) which makes it unequivocal. If the brain can find a way out of the cognitive dissonance that allows for a person to "feel safer", then the brain will take that path. That is why things are presented in this fashion in a limited hangout, to exploit that tendency. The only way to break the programming is to present the information in a way that doesn't allow for that path, much less encourage it as this one does.
It is exactly the rhetoric that encourages that path of "safe space," which is replete in this article, that makes me think this is an intentional limited hangout.
Is this the part of the movie when the Narrative Setters begin too slowly bleed out the Truth, attempting to get ahead, or at least plant a seed of B,S before it comes out from a different, more reliable source?
Get ahead of the storms
Here is another 2016 article from Vanity Fair about Hillary shooting a panda. Of course Seth Rich's nickname was Panda, and the campaign knew that because they put up a bike rack in his honor after his murder, where they dedicated it to "panda".
I forgot the link:)
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/01/why-hillary-clinton-win-democratic-nomination
wow.
Wow is right....
I could not believe this either.
Brain Dead, your thread I bet connects to my other thread, and my follow up find in the Vanity Fair Article in a response to another digging Anon further down on the thread.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17rm5SmTZb/dep-of-energy-counterintelligenc/
You know, I see the connection. When I first found this, I thought, DOE? Why? Anyway, I see why the research would be needed.
Yep. Thank you sir.
Looks like a cover story for Obutthole to me boys.
Cover or explain b4 things get bad for them?
Slow at first, then all of a sudden.
Amen. Coming fast now.
Interesting how having one or two outlets that break the narrative, can change society. Truth social and X. It’s shocking how almost every source of media was a consolidated psyop.
I am not surprised about the consolidated psyop. The news media have all been consolidated into 6 conglomerates.
They slowly shaped an entire reality. Now DHS is going to reprimand border patrol for not asking for pronouns. Like those illegals care. Especially South Americans who are mostly Catholics and anti rainbow. From the food, to music… movies books education. We’ve been inserted into a false reality. And it was done by censorship, withholding truth and facts. I’ve been around the conspiracy block for a while. But I guess as Q said I had to really walk through it.
Yes.