Commander-in-Chief Donald Trump updated his TS profile background 💥 🇺🇸🦅🥁
(media.greatawakening.win)
WWG1WGA
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
Seriously.... Do people still need MORE hints, nods and winks than Trump has provided? And if this was some sign, what would be the purpose? That you should now, all of a sudden... what? March in the street and overthrow the corrupt officials? Start paying attention to the info war? begin NOW to act locally and take responsibility at home?
Sorry. (reiterating offgrid's point). Just think about it logically.
But ok, yes, yes!
Its a sign! So create memes! Red pill your friends! Share red pills and help others! That's the sign! Now is the time! don't wait!
PS. The idea that Trump is commander in chief seems to be simply a belief and I don't see anywhere where it is backed up by actual research or evidence from publicly available data. The guy who researched plenty of the publicly available information and developed the Devolution theory himself says he doesn't see anything that implies Trump is still CiC. Just saying.
There's no way Trump and patriots would hand the nukes over to the deep state. Zero chance.
Yes. Lots of screwy things happened on Jan. 20, 2021. The funeral 21 gun salute, the swearing in before noon, no ceremonial passing of the football, the ghost town inauguration..., etc... etc...
Correction: Biden got the 3-cannon funeral salute. Trump got the 21 gun salute.
Answer: devolution
yes
Right. Maybe I misread your comment: seemed like you were refuting my argument that Trump isn't CIC. 'Cos what I was saying is that Trump isn't CIC, because that's not how devolution works (according to PP, and I agree).
But of course, we don't know. We can only speculate.
<scratches head>
agree. i don't think that's how devo/COG works
FIron: That guy (JH / PP?) do you remember when he said this? Was it on the DPH show? I watch Badlands occasionally but hadn’t heard this about his theory changing. Thanks in advance - appreciate the input.
Sometimes I think I'm the only one who doesn't believe that Trump is still CIC.
How can people ignore all the failures that Trump would have caused since 2020, if he really WAS still CIC?
Like that nightmare of pulling out in Afghanistan? Or working with Ukraine, getting them weapons and money and troops?
Because that might give them a negative emotional reaction
No, they don't need anymore hints or nods, we had 5 or 6 years of that already, THEY NEED ACTION so obvious even somebody who has never heard of Q says, "Wow, someone just got serious about corruption". So that when that happens and Trump says "The storm is upon us" there is zero question in out minds what the plan is and that it's on track and that it is bearing unmistakable results.
At what point are winks and nods not enough? If Biden wins in 2024? If he's inaugurated? After 3 more years of what we've just been through with him? The 2030 election?
I honestly think they are forming opinions with research. Research would only prove it.
I hope so, because some of the threads posted here don't even hold up to 60 seconds worth of research, like the one trying to claim the Rothschilds are worth $240 trillion dollars because they held $50 million in English deb paying 8% from 140 years ago or something.