Linguistically, it's interesting how much change there has been over the past 7 years.
Trump brought in the entire "Fake news" expression. These days, its a LOT easier and open to talk about Marxists, Neo-Marxists, Cultural Marxists etc. (7 years ago, 'media' was telling us that 'cultural marxism is a conspiracy theory'.
On that note, the cultural marxists were fully aware for the last 7 decades that language is a key battleground. But to a large extent, they have overplayed their hand. Now, as you note, everyone or anyone who disagrees with their agenda or calls them out is 'far right'.
I think I prefer 'sovereign nationalist' or "sovereignty nationalist".
Here's why. One, it avoids the religion label, and so it open to people of all faiths. Two, Christianity inherently promotes real individual and national sovereignty more than any other faith or ideological persuasion, so promoting the idea of sovereignty inherently advances the Christian providential agenda.
I think adopting "far right" gives them what they want.
It has always been a divisive tactic to separate the people they deem "deplorable" from the average right wing, to avoid offending the mainstream masses. This has allowed them to single out public players from our side and effectively work to cancel them.
Now their mask of duplicity came off as their masks of cloth went on; they hate the entirety of the right, and don't care about offending all of us anymore. By willingly separating ourselves from the rest of the right, there is a strategic disadvantage.
I think the label, "right so far" is much more appropriate.
I am proud to be far right!
I am proud to be the dreaded Far Right Extremist! (that's simply a Constitutionalist these days)
Linguistically, it's interesting how much change there has been over the past 7 years.
Trump brought in the entire "Fake news" expression. These days, its a LOT easier and open to talk about Marxists, Neo-Marxists, Cultural Marxists etc. (7 years ago, 'media' was telling us that 'cultural marxism is a conspiracy theory'.
On that note, the cultural marxists were fully aware for the last 7 decades that language is a key battleground. But to a large extent, they have overplayed their hand. Now, as you note, everyone or anyone who disagrees with their agenda or calls them out is 'far right'.
The media were originally pushing the term "fake news", but Trump turned it around on them.
Is that so? Was not aware of that. Well, he certainly did a masterful job.
Reminds me of this oldie but goodie...
Control the language and control the mind.
Adopt "Christian Nationalist"
It's better in every way
I think I prefer 'sovereign nationalist' or "sovereignty nationalist".
Here's why. One, it avoids the religion label, and so it open to people of all faiths. Two, Christianity inherently promotes real individual and national sovereignty more than any other faith or ideological persuasion, so promoting the idea of sovereignty inherently advances the Christian providential agenda.
Anyway, just a thought. Updoogle.
I think adopting "far right" gives them what they want.
It has always been a divisive tactic to separate the people they deem "deplorable" from the average right wing, to avoid offending the mainstream masses. This has allowed them to single out public players from our side and effectively work to cancel them.
Now their mask of duplicity came off as their masks of cloth went on; they hate the entirety of the right, and don't care about offending all of us anymore. By willingly separating ourselves from the rest of the right, there is a strategic disadvantage.
In my opinion anyway, I could very well be wrong.
TBH this cunt sounds like hes from the left.
Mark my words, this new Pres will be awful for Argentina
Freedom is far right. Everyone knows it.
Shoot, I thought we were "Deplorables" or "Ultra MAGA."
He is controlled op he loves isreal