A Debunk the debunkers film I linked here is interesting - I’m still on the skeptical side. Not to say we didn’t launch a rocket and possibly get there.
At the very least, I believe the photos taken were not truly from the moon. Nobody could have possibly composed and ‘framed’ the pictures so perfectly w/o a viewfinder with a near 100% ‘hit’ rate.
They were using chest mounted and handheld manually operated cameras hopping around with massive gloves on.
The videos that sync up with some of the still shots as they were taken don’t support any exacting or careful framing.
The minimal camera modifications were well documented. Not going to dig it up ( had at one time ).
These are some of the most carefully framed & composed photos in history! The cross hair fiducials show almost no cropping was needed to achieve such high art. Just not possible IMHOP.
I’m an electrical engineer and expert witness in mechanical and electrical engineering here in Australia. I have 35 years of heavy construction engineering experience. I’ve watched and studied for months everything on the internet about this. No way in my opinion has any human gone beyond low earth orbit, about 400 miles up. NASA themselves say they can’t go because of the radiation. There are many many problems landing humans on the moon and returning them safely. X-rays reflected off the surface from the sun’s gamma rays since there is no atmosphere to absorb their energy. Study NASA’s photo of the lunar lander and tell me that’s not a poorly made movie prop. Not everything Q said was true. The average American would be horrified to learn that their symbol of technological superiority was faked, so that thread is best not pulled at this point in time. They are going to have a hard enough time learning their government just tried to exterminate its own people by convincing them to line up for a bioweapon. The moon landing is a lower priority and may never be divulged.
I have no sauce for any of this. But I remember reading in more than one article, that Stanley Kubric made a death bed confession, to filming the entire moon landing, in a sound stage in London. I have seen footage, of an astronaut on the Moon's surface, who narrowly escaped being struck by a neon light fixture that broke loose on one end. Another one where a cat came strolling through the scene. Who was running the camera when the lander descended to the surface? So many questions.
Last time i will say this 'Wagging the moon doggle' you will be embarrassed after reading this stunning piece of investigative Journalism that you ever fell for the getting to the moon on a big firework story.
I particularly love the folding car that they took with them, apparently NASA had the ability to fold welded metal.
Great 'q'uestion, I doubt if man, or machine got outside of the atmosphere (we'sa stuck on the earth), but that just me. Now, the Russian can do the "Rover" and the fake Mars landing while their at it..
Best theory I heard on that was the landing was real, but the footage they released was faked. Reason being they found stuff on the moon they had to keep hidden, hence why so many of the astronauts have seemed so troubled about the whole affair later in life.
That's rich, considering how fake looking all the Chinese space footage is.
I guess I'm not surprised AI is another Chinese shill when we look at how woke it has been.
Hope those "smart people" don't integrate it with the elections!
I grew up watching Apollo and Skylab launches at Cape Canaveral. My aunt and uncle were astronauts for Skylab (qualified for mission but not launched). I have met and talked w Buzz Aldren, Al Worden and others. My family was also involved in the Shuttle program.
I grew up believing in NASA and the space program.
That said, my family was/is also Deep State. Active CIA and ODNI as well as Monarch programs and media PSYOP manipulation. I don’t trust them and have minimal contact.
While I think there is the possibility that the moon landing was faked, I fully believe that we have advanced tech (TR3B) that allows us to travel easily in outer space. The backup operational computer for the first Space Shuttle was an HP 41CV calculator - I’m not sure something as basic as an original iPhone (or lower) could control all the systems on an aircraft much less a space craft.
As a former analyst I don’t view things as black and white. It’s not either or. There is a gradient with varying levels of truth.
Given my distrust of the government and knowing what we’ve learned since Q appeared. My confidence level has gone down.
People nowadays often forget how much pilots did before computers, and how their copilot wasn't just backup ... they performed many calculations and also handled many of the secondary systems. Our first astronauts were the best of the best of our top pilots.
I don't know if the moon landings were faked or not but I would like to know what happened to the technology that allowed astronauts to pass through the Van Allen Belts unscathed. it seems remarkable that NASA could "lose" such information.
I do entertain the theory that the media that was widely circulated about the landing could have been manufactured, but in the midst of a space, and ideological race, does anyone honestly think that the Russians would've allowed the USA to get away with such a farce? People who entertain these theories tend to forget than Apollo 8 and 10 both got to the Moon and back, just didn't land, and 6 out of the 17 Apollo missions landed on the moon, so that would have been one heck of a conspiracy to cover up at a time when trans-national spying and surveillance was at a peak.
I watched the video above. Putin remarked "interesting" in tones of understated incredulity. They have known all along that we were there. They have this interesting technology called a telescope. We are still bouncing laser beams off the Moon from retroreflectors left behind.
This tells us more about the state of Google's A.I. than it does about the Moon landing. Next the A.I. will tell us it has a bridge in New York City that is for sale.
American Moon, 2017
A Debunk the debunkers film I linked here is interesting - I’m still on the skeptical side. Not to say we didn’t launch a rocket and possibly get there.
At the very least, I believe the photos taken were not truly from the moon. Nobody could have possibly composed and ‘framed’ the pictures so perfectly w/o a viewfinder with a near 100% ‘hit’ rate.
They were using chest mounted and handheld manually operated cameras hopping around with massive gloves on. The videos that sync up with some of the still shots as they were taken don’t support any exacting or careful framing.
The minimal camera modifications were well documented. Not going to dig it up ( had at one time ).
These are some of the most carefully framed & composed photos in history! The cross hair fiducials show almost no cropping was needed to achieve such high art. Just not possible IMHOP.
I can’t imagine operating a Hassy w moon gloves on.
I’m an electrical engineer and expert witness in mechanical and electrical engineering here in Australia. I have 35 years of heavy construction engineering experience. I’ve watched and studied for months everything on the internet about this. No way in my opinion has any human gone beyond low earth orbit, about 400 miles up. NASA themselves say they can’t go because of the radiation. There are many many problems landing humans on the moon and returning them safely. X-rays reflected off the surface from the sun’s gamma rays since there is no atmosphere to absorb their energy. Study NASA’s photo of the lunar lander and tell me that’s not a poorly made movie prop. Not everything Q said was true. The average American would be horrified to learn that their symbol of technological superiority was faked, so that thread is best not pulled at this point in time. They are going to have a hard enough time learning their government just tried to exterminate its own people by convincing them to line up for a bioweapon. The moon landing is a lower priority and may never be divulged.
It's easier just to disbelieve everything they say u til you get real.proof. pictures are no longer ger worth a thousand words.
I have no sauce for any of this. But I remember reading in more than one article, that Stanley Kubric made a death bed confession, to filming the entire moon landing, in a sound stage in London. I have seen footage, of an astronaut on the Moon's surface, who narrowly escaped being struck by a neon light fixture that broke loose on one end. Another one where a cat came strolling through the scene. Who was running the camera when the lander descended to the surface? So many questions.
Lol, I'd love to see the cat one🐸
Last time i will say this 'Wagging the moon doggle' you will be embarrassed after reading this stunning piece of investigative Journalism that you ever fell for the getting to the moon on a big firework story. I particularly love the folding car that they took with them, apparently NASA had the ability to fold welded metal.
Have they been able to determine if the latest India moon-landing was real?
Great 'q'uestion, I doubt if man, or machine got outside of the atmosphere (we'sa stuck on the earth), but that just me. Now, the Russian can do the "Rover" and the fake Mars landing while their at it..
So, all those telecommunications and other satellites, including the ones in geosynchronous orbit -- how's THAT work?
Yep, and that's about as far as they are going to go, or ever get. Stuck in a 'bubble', "snow globe"...
IDK, but I am sure NASA will clear this up ASAP.
If that India landing was faked, it sure got me good!
I couldn't tell the difference between that and actual minecraft.
https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie-1/
Link if anyone's interested
Best theory I heard on that was the landing was real, but the footage they released was faked. Reason being they found stuff on the moon they had to keep hidden, hence why so many of the astronauts have seemed so troubled about the whole affair later in life.
That's rich, considering how fake looking all the Chinese space footage is. I guess I'm not surprised AI is another Chinese shill when we look at how woke it has been. Hope those "smart people" don't integrate it with the elections!
Lol, the Chinese rover on mars looks like green screen. https://i.imgur.com/zz6B3DH.jpg
http://www.cnsa.gov.cn/n6759533/c6812126/part/6787210.jpg
I grew up watching Apollo and Skylab launches at Cape Canaveral. My aunt and uncle were astronauts for Skylab (qualified for mission but not launched). I have met and talked w Buzz Aldren, Al Worden and others. My family was also involved in the Shuttle program.
I grew up believing in NASA and the space program.
That said, my family was/is also Deep State. Active CIA and ODNI as well as Monarch programs and media PSYOP manipulation. I don’t trust them and have minimal contact.
While I think there is the possibility that the moon landing was faked, I fully believe that we have advanced tech (TR3B) that allows us to travel easily in outer space. The backup operational computer for the first Space Shuttle was an HP 41CV calculator - I’m not sure something as basic as an original iPhone (or lower) could control all the systems on an aircraft much less a space craft.
As a former analyst I don’t view things as black and white. It’s not either or. There is a gradient with varying levels of truth.
Given my distrust of the government and knowing what we’ve learned since Q appeared. My confidence level has gone down.
People nowadays often forget how much pilots did before computers, and how their copilot wasn't just backup ... they performed many calculations and also handled many of the secondary systems. Our first astronauts were the best of the best of our top pilots.
well said.
"Today's under educated think that because they don't understand all that, that it must have been faked."
Now extrapolate that out 30 more years. Idiocracy may have been a documentary.
I don't know if the moon landings were faked or not but I would like to know what happened to the technology that allowed astronauts to pass through the Van Allen Belts unscathed. it seems remarkable that NASA could "lose" such information.
Don't forget how powerful the slide-rule was in capable hands ...
that was a necessary tool when I was in college.
These responses show how many uneducated people are here regardless of which position we take.
I do entertain the theory that the media that was widely circulated about the landing could have been manufactured, but in the midst of a space, and ideological race, does anyone honestly think that the Russians would've allowed the USA to get away with such a farce? People who entertain these theories tend to forget than Apollo 8 and 10 both got to the Moon and back, just didn't land, and 6 out of the 17 Apollo missions landed on the moon, so that would have been one heck of a conspiracy to cover up at a time when trans-national spying and surveillance was at a peak.
17 missions ....
I watched the video above. Putin remarked "interesting" in tones of understated incredulity. They have known all along that we were there. They have this interesting technology called a telescope. We are still bouncing laser beams off the Moon from retroreflectors left behind.
This tells us more about the state of Google's A.I. than it does about the Moon landing. Next the A.I. will tell us it has a bridge in New York City that is for sale.
And about the lack of serious education of our current population.