TEXIT Petition Hits Signature Threshold To Appear On March Primary Ballot
The Texas Nationalist Movement (TNM) has reached the necessary signature threshold in their petition to put a proposition on the statewide primary ballot in March 2024 that will ask voters the question: “Should the State of Texas reassert its status as an ...
NO ONE wants Mexico. In fact, I'm betting that one of the forces behind this secessionist move is precisely BECAUSE Mexico is flooding the Texas border with their castoff undesirables.
Mexico is the CM Punk of countries.
It may give you some great things on occasion (food, in this case--I love me some tacos), but it will ultimately poison you and leave you worse off than before you ever met, possibly even resulting in physical violence. Stay away.
For me, it's Huevos Rancheros (eggs ranch style) as my fave Mexican (or Tex-Mex) food. I had some good experiences in Mexico way back before the drug cartels even existed, and that's a long time ago. Today, I wouldn't go to Mexico for ANY reason.
By the way, I really enjoyed the two movies, "Sicario" and "Sicario 2"... gritty and action filled. Another TV series to watch is "ZERO ZERO ZERO." Drugs, smuggling, violence, betrayal, and humans at their worst.
Largest silver deposits in the world. Huge wealth in mexico. Wouldnt be thr first time we sent soldiers to secure wealth/commodities
I mean, Mexico has issues butnit also has a chunk of our manufacturing, it's got agriculture, tourism, oil and gas. We've already got a shit ton of its citizens here now anyway, might as well take it over, clean it up, make it conservative and all is good in New Texico!
That would be good. Mexico's southern border is small; we could secure that easier than the northern border is "secured", wipe all the cartels, gangs and corruption throughout the country. We would see a major migration back to Mexico.
I hope this happens and Texas takes over Texas.
I can't blame them but it would suck for the rest of us
I would go and apply asylum with the country of Texas.
Crap, then the Californicators will flood a different state. Tenn. has more blues than it needs already Nash, Memp.
I always wanted to see California, but not the cities. I grew up in Orlando Fla. and it's a crappy place thanks to Disney. We live in Nashville now, and since the Democrats have the Urban Youth trained for SNAP and Section 8 housing, both my wife and I work a lot of OT, so we don't see much of the Liberal blight.
That's how the Philippines is, people there re a blight on the scenery with the trash strewn about everywhere.
Memphis is like Detroit.
Texit will never happen. A good idea and a place I would consider if it ever did but I remember history when some Southern states tried to exit the US. Didn't turn out too well for millions of people on both sides!
During the first conflict, 95 percent of all manufacturing was held by the northern states. All the Union had to do, was blockade all the Southern ports, and they were cut off from arms and supplies from Europe. Now, I dare say there is more manufacturing in the South, than in the North, with more gun makers heading south every day. Might not be so easy this time around.
The first one wasn't easy either although Texas probably has more arms than the north and south put together now! Kek
Texas going to war against the United States would be a bloody suicide...and afterward, Texas would remain a state.
Skip a step, Texans.
Texas was a nation
It was a Republic to itself.
I've always felt like succession movements were the freedom equivalent of taking your ball and going home.
Think of it as conference realignment, like in NCAA Football.
Texas would be starting a new "Super Conference" - the SECede (kek). We would invite a few other "teams" right away, like Oklahoma, Missouri, and Tennessee, and Louisiana. Then we would probably invite others to apply. The original 4 though would be a great start and easier to secure since they all have lots of arms and militia, massive military bases, are contiguous, have all the manufacturing and agriculture we would need to start out, have deep-water ports, tourism, energy, pre-existing weapons companies, high-tech industries, music and entertainment industries, international airports (and a space port), and are pretty much like-minded. The fact that Texas alone makes more in exports each year than New York and California combined, and has the 8th largest economy in the world helps a lot as well.
The trick would be doing all of this without going to war with America. It might require bringing on more southern states from the start (since way more armed people live in the south) if diplomacy doesn't work.
All I know is it would be really interesting. In fact it could actually be the answer on how to reboot the USA and get back to the constitution since once it starts and the rest of America sees how it is going they might want to join. Once we establish a government without the massive corruption that exists now (and the Deep State), and a justice system that is fair again, our freedoms would be back and debt would be gone.
This matter was settled 150 years ago. No state can secede from the US legally. Doing so is considered an act of war against the US, thus starting the next Civil War. The only time Texas really had this right was from 1845-the end of the Civil War. After readmittance into the US, the right to secede was changed to the right to break up into multiple, smaller states giving the region of Texas more house members, as well as more senators in DC. Texit is a pipe dream that leads to war. Which may not be a bad thing when you think about it. Especially if other states join in the festivities!
Oh, so now we’re worried about the legality of things?
I can work with that. If the federal government decides to enforce the laws they have on the books, then I don’t think Texas needs to leave.
Thats a win/win scenario if I’ve ever seen one.
This is what our founders intended: The Union was formed by the voluntary agreement of the states; and these, in uniting together, have not forfeited their nationality, nor have they been reduced to the condition of one and the same people. If one of the states chooses to withdraw from the compact, it would be difficult to disapprove its right of doing so, and the Federal Government would have no means of maintaining its claims directly either by force or right.
"But as the plan of the convention aims only at a partial union or consolidation, the State governments would clearly retain all the rights of sovereignty which they before had, and which were not, by that act, EXCLUSIVELY delegated to the United States." - Alexander Hamilton
"A national government is a government of the people of a single state or nation, united as a community by what is termed the 'social compact,’ and possessing complete and perfect supremacy over persons and things, so far as they can be made the lawful objects of civil government. A federal government is distinguished from a national government by its being the government of a community of independent and sovereign states, united by compact." -Blacks Law Dictionary
Might as well. This IS NOT the united states of America anymore anyway
And I will be moving to Texas immediately afterward
I’d rather see CALEXIT.
A friend at work showed me a movie trailer for “civil war” movie. I told him it was predictive programming. Here we are.