Guess what? NOBODY who claims to "know" that the virus exists has been able to -- or even willing to -- prove it, once they were challenged.
Also, some of the favorite "alt docs" that people around here like (McCoullogh, for example), have REFUSED to debate this. It's not that they have explained why the believe what they do, but rather they have simply refused to discuss it with anyone who could challenge their views.
Here is more, for anyone interested in the subject:
Obviously, these resources are for others reading this, and not YOU ... since your mind is already made up to BeLIEve mUh sCienCE. Plus, I suspect you might not be able to grasp the subject, anyway -- because, as you say ... "you can't fix stupid."
For anyone interested here’s the stated criteria for proving it. I don’t know enough to say too much but #4 seems weird. Why would the virus cause identical sickness in different people? Almost everything we do to our bodies acts differently in different people. I wouldn’t expect a virus to affect a 90 year old the same as a 20 year old.
The following experiments would need to be successfully completed before the viral theory can be deemed factual:
a unique particle with the characteristics of a virus is purified from the tissues or fluids of a sick living being. The purification method to be used is at the discretion of the virologists but electron micrographs must be provided to confirm the successful purification of morphologically-identical alleged viral particles;
the purified particle is biochemically characterized for its protein components and genetic sequence;
the proteins are proven to be coded for by these same genetic sequences;
the purified viral particles alone, through a natural exposure route, are shown to cause identical sickness
in test subjects, by using valid controls;
particles must then be successfully re-isolated (through purification) from the test subject at 4 above, and demonstrated to have exactly the same characteristics as the particles found in step 1
That's a lot of links, fren. I won't be reading them (its just too much) but I gather it is a lot of people who think/say/believe that the/a virus is or has not been isolated. I respectfully disagree and I think they are all wrong.
What if they don't want you to look into the virus because it would prove that it was a manufactured bioweapon? If it is a manufactured bioweapon that was used on innocent people it sure would be convenient to have your main opposition believe there is no such thing as viruses.
Another question, if SARS-CoV-2 doesn't exist why does Q speak as though it does?
But I thought "Teh vIrUss hAb NeBeR bIn iSeLatEed"
It has not been isolated.
Your sarcasm is sad. This story is about a COMPUTER SIMULATION, not a real virus that was ever isolated.
Edumacate yourself.
It has not been isolated.
ACKSHEWALLLLLLLY
I'd say edumacate yourself back, but there's an old saying that you can't fix stupid.
Well, if you are so sure, then go ahead and answer the Virus Challenge, which is open to anyone who can PROVE it.
https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/settling-the-virus-debate/
Guess what? NOBODY who claims to "know" that the virus exists has been able to -- or even willing to -- prove it, once they were challenged.
Also, some of the favorite "alt docs" that people around here like (McCoullogh, for example), have REFUSED to debate this. It's not that they have explained why the believe what they do, but rather they have simply refused to discuss it with anyone who could challenge their views.
Here is more, for anyone interested in the subject:
https://rumble.com/v1entpj-a-follow-up-to-the-virus-challenge-with-dr.-tom-cowan-mike-donio-mike-stone.html
Obviously, these resources are for others reading this, and not YOU ... since your mind is already made up to BeLIEve mUh sCienCE. Plus, I suspect you might not be able to grasp the subject, anyway -- because, as you say ... "you can't fix stupid."
For anyone interested here’s the stated criteria for proving it. I don’t know enough to say too much but #4 seems weird. Why would the virus cause identical sickness in different people? Almost everything we do to our bodies acts differently in different people. I wouldn’t expect a virus to affect a 90 year old the same as a 20 year old.
The following experiments would need to be successfully completed before the viral theory can be deemed factual:
^ Downvote without comment ... by a non-thinker.
I think we can all guess where that came from.
Why don't YOU RISE UP TO THE VIRUS CHALLENGE, rather than run and hide?
I see your point about "stupid"...
From your post.
I see his post, but raise you Biden.
That's a lot of links, fren. I won't be reading them (its just too much) but I gather it is a lot of people who think/say/believe that the/a virus is or has not been isolated. I respectfully disagree and I think they are all wrong.
A question. If the CDC, for example, who you cited, would lie about the safety and efficacy of a so-called "vaccine" why should I believe when they say a virus is not/can not be isolated?
What if they don't want you to look into the virus because it would prove that it was a manufactured bioweapon? If it is a manufactured bioweapon that was used on innocent people it sure would be convenient to have your main opposition believe there is no such thing as viruses.
Another question, if SARS-CoV-2 doesn't exist why does Q speak as though it does?
u/#q4114
Thanks for the thoughtful reply! I do not disagree with any of this.
Obviously the majority of deaths attributed to COVID were not COVID.