Guess what? NOBODY who claims to "know" that the virus exists has been able to -- or even willing to -- prove it, once they were challenged.
Also, some of the favorite "alt docs" that people around here like (McCoullogh, for example), have REFUSED to debate this. It's not that they have explained why the believe what they do, but rather they have simply refused to discuss it with anyone who could challenge their views.
Here is more, for anyone interested in the subject:
Obviously, these resources are for others reading this, and not YOU ... since your mind is already made up to BeLIEve mUh sCienCE. Plus, I suspect you might not be able to grasp the subject, anyway -- because, as you say ... "you can't fix stupid."
For anyone interested here’s the stated criteria for proving it. I don’t know enough to say too much but #4 seems weird. Why would the virus cause identical sickness in different people? Almost everything we do to our bodies acts differently in different people. I wouldn’t expect a virus to affect a 90 year old the same as a 20 year old.
The following experiments would need to be successfully completed before the viral theory can be deemed factual:
a unique particle with the characteristics of a virus is purified from the tissues or fluids of a sick living being. The purification method to be used is at the discretion of the virologists but electron micrographs must be provided to confirm the successful purification of morphologically-identical alleged viral particles;
the purified particle is biochemically characterized for its protein components and genetic sequence;
the proteins are proven to be coded for by these same genetic sequences;
the purified viral particles alone, through a natural exposure route, are shown to cause identical sickness
in test subjects, by using valid controls;
particles must then be successfully re-isolated (through purification) from the test subject at 4 above, and demonstrated to have exactly the same characteristics as the particles found in step 1
The virus lie has been proven with Stefan Lanka's experiment in April 2021.
It is further validated by the fact that EVERY virologist or anyone else who has been challeged to PROVE THAT A VIRUS EXISTS HAS FAILED TO DO SO.
The fact that you are ignorant of this simply means you do not know -- not that it is impossible to know.
Here is David Baltimore, considered one of the THEE preeminent virologists in the world, who cannot answer the simple question, "How is a virus isolated so it can be studied?"
Everyone who claims that a virus exists just runs and hides -- like you just did.
A basic rule of logic is: The burden of proof is on he who asserts the positive.
That would be YOU.
And the ONLY thing I have seen from anyone is one logical fallacy after another as their "proof."
Yet, we have a control study from virologist Stefan Lanka proving that the process of "isolation" is what CREATES the artifacts seen in the photos of the electron microscope. They didn't exist before then, they don't exist inside the body, and cannot be pathogenic.
But you don't want to actually research anything, so I leave this comment for others who might.
For you ... just "trust the science" from people like Fauci and Baltimore. That way, you won't hurt your feels.
Ah yes. The ol' proving-it-exists logical fallacy. Yeah you got to be careful of that one. Good for you to stay away! Reminds me of this great quote:
I'm not going to answer you because when you see through my bullshit, you may call me out on my bullshit. And my feelings could be hurt. Therefore you're wrong.
It has not been isolated.
ACKSHEWALLLLLLLY
I'd say edumacate yourself back, but there's an old saying that you can't fix stupid.
Well, if you are so sure, then go ahead and answer the Virus Challenge, which is open to anyone who can PROVE it.
https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/settling-the-virus-debate/
Guess what? NOBODY who claims to "know" that the virus exists has been able to -- or even willing to -- prove it, once they were challenged.
Also, some of the favorite "alt docs" that people around here like (McCoullogh, for example), have REFUSED to debate this. It's not that they have explained why the believe what they do, but rather they have simply refused to discuss it with anyone who could challenge their views.
Here is more, for anyone interested in the subject:
https://rumble.com/v1entpj-a-follow-up-to-the-virus-challenge-with-dr.-tom-cowan-mike-donio-mike-stone.html
Obviously, these resources are for others reading this, and not YOU ... since your mind is already made up to BeLIEve mUh sCienCE. Plus, I suspect you might not be able to grasp the subject, anyway -- because, as you say ... "you can't fix stupid."
For anyone interested here’s the stated criteria for proving it. I don’t know enough to say too much but #4 seems weird. Why would the virus cause identical sickness in different people? Almost everything we do to our bodies acts differently in different people. I wouldn’t expect a virus to affect a 90 year old the same as a 20 year old.
The following experiments would need to be successfully completed before the viral theory can be deemed factual:
^ Downvote without comment ... by a non-thinker.
I think we can all guess where that came from.
Why don't YOU RISE UP TO THE VIRUS CHALLENGE, rather than run and hide?
Sorry but this is the logical fallacy of Argument by Demanding Impossible Perfection (Unfalsifiable Claims), and I am not going to play your stupid games. And I will continue to downvote you, so there is no ambiguity. No matter what evidence is presented you will demand more, making your claims unfalsifiable.
The virus lie has been proven with Stefan Lanka's experiment in April 2021.
It is further validated by the fact that EVERY virologist or anyone else who has been challeged to PROVE THAT A VIRUS EXISTS HAS FAILED TO DO SO.
The fact that you are ignorant of this simply means you do not know -- not that it is impossible to know.
Here is David Baltimore, considered one of the THEE preeminent virologists in the world, who cannot answer the simple question, "How is a virus isolated so it can be studied?"
https://rumble.com/v4250e2-nobel-laureate-david-baltimore-explains-virus-isolation.html
Everyone who claims that a virus exists just runs and hides -- like you just did.
A basic rule of logic is: The burden of proof is on he who asserts the positive.
That would be YOU.
And the ONLY thing I have seen from anyone is one logical fallacy after another as their "proof."
Yet, we have a control study from virologist Stefan Lanka proving that the process of "isolation" is what CREATES the artifacts seen in the photos of the electron microscope. They didn't exist before then, they don't exist inside the body, and cannot be pathogenic.
But you don't want to actually research anything, so I leave this comment for others who might.
For you ... just "trust the science" from people like Fauci and Baltimore. That way, you won't hurt your feels.
Ah yes. The ol' proving-it-exists logical fallacy. Yeah you got to be careful of that one. Good for you to stay away! Reminds me of this great quote:
– Nikola Tesla, probably
Yesss,,, downvote me back, you'll feel better.
u/#feelsgood
I see your point about "stupid"...
From your post.
I see his post, but raise you Biden.