.....
A big data study of 99 million people across eight countries showed greater than expected incidence of side effects from various Covid-19 vaccines, the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) said on Monday.
The study, originally published in the medical journal Vaccine on February 12, looked at 13 neurological, blood, and heart-related conditions, called “adverse events of special interest.” Researchers looked at 99,068,901 vaccinated individuals from ten sites in eight countries.
“The size of the population in this study increased the possibility of identifying rare potential vaccine safety signals,” said Kristyna Faksova, the lead author of the study from the Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen, Denmark.
According to the GVDN, the study observed a greater incidence of myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the heart sac) than expected among those who took the Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2) and Moderna (mRNA-1273) shots.
Moderna’s vaccine also had a higher rate of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM, inflammation and swelling in the brain and spinal cord), with seven observed events compared to two expected within 42 days of the first shot.
Safety signals for myocarditis were “consistently identified” following the first three doses of either mRNA shot, with the highest ratio after the second dose. Signals for pericarditis also appeared following the first and fourth doses of mRNA-1273 and were also observed after a third dose of the Oxford/Astra Zeneca (ChAdOx1) viral vector vaccine.
Recipients of ChAdOx1 had 190 observed events of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) compared to the expected 76, and 69 observed instances of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST, a type of blood clot in the brain) compared to the expected 21, the study has shown.
The GVDN has made the results available to the public on its interactive data dashboards, along with a warning not to read too much into correlations and that the vaccines are both safe and effective.
“By making the data dashboards publicly available, we are able to support greater transparency, and stronger communications to the health sector and public,” GVDN co-director Dr. Helen Petousis-Harris said.
The study was part of the GVDN’s Global COVID Vaccine Safety Project and was funded entirely by a $10 million grant from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
.....
https://www.rt.com/news/592695-covid-vaccine-effects-study/
.....
I know three people in my immediate circle of friends who took the jabs and are now complaining about "brain fog." One of them has had two TIA's that required ER visits. Another one can no longer read books or long articles, as she can't focus on the main plot or line of reasoning.
Used to have a coworker who was a jab-happy globalist who was showing early signs of dementia before he retired a year ago. Before 2020 I didn't to have answer the same questions multiple times a week or even twice in the same day. Who knows if he's even still alive.
We may never know the full count of people maimed or killed by the jabs, many will be misdiagnosed, or their cause-of-death covered up, or no autopsies performed if the deaths appear "natural." And it may take years for this weaponized jab to do its dirty work, which now seems to be mainly to thin the human population from the face of the Earth.
Yes it is frustrating but we can not give up as we need to keep digging for truth and transparency.
It's not a "neurological disease". If so... then how did they catch the "disease"? Was it airborne, or something contaminated that they touched or ingested?
Nope. It was "neurological DAMAGE" due to an injection of poison masquerading as a "vax".
Good point!
Funded by CDC? Whaaaaaaat?
Also, expected adverse events? And the reality was higher than the expected levels? Does this paradigm prove experiment status?
To get the funding, the study probably had to include this bullshitty disclaimer:
The study is a step in the right direction, but it might be a limited hangout, and the adverse effects are still underreported.
I see your point that they were expecting adverse effects. It goes to show that the wicked bastards viewed billions of people as experimental guinea pigs.
Diseases or other medical conditions have a certain baseline incidence rate. For instance brain cancer rates are about 6.2 per 100,000 per year. So given a sample group of 10 million people and in the first year I expect around 620 to get brain cancer that year. Over time those rates may increase of decrease depending upon lifestyle choices and chemicals and other environmental factors.
Ah, that makes total sense. Thanks. The way I was reading their explanation made is sound like they were expecting the lowers numbers to be caused by the vax.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/02/groundbreaking-global-study-99-million-vaccinated-people-reveals/
Just adding more sauce even tho this post is soaked with plenty already ;)
Lots of MSM is now reporting this too, so either the jig is up or they're trying to soften the blow before a tidal wave of lawsuits from those forced by their employer to get the vaxxx
Via Bloomberg on MSN: https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/largest-covid-vaccine-study-yet-finds-links-to-health-conditions/ar-BB1iuvvi
This is the study: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24001270
more studies from TGP: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/?s=vaccine+study
My grandma was vaccinated.
She was asking everybody where her mom is as if her mother was still alive.
And that's not even counting the potential prion diseases.
5 Dead friends in their late 40's early 50's all without any diseases processes or comorbidities going on. Sudden and unexpected. 2 Friends with blood cancers. All since 2021. People I know in the medical field keep talking about neuro, heart and cancers through the roof.
Is she going to be arrested like the New Zealand whistleblower was?
Wondering when the jab happy folks will start blaming Trump for the fast rollout of the jab? Even though it didn't come out until after the elections and they were so excited saying Bidet had something to do with the jabs rolling out. I'd say let them keep thinking Bidet was to blame for it, because the more information reaches them about the "adverse events" the more they will go after the person who rolled it out.
I’m @ work rn,
I just saw this reported on Mainstream KRON4 news.
My coworkers weren’t paying attention, just chatting to each other.
My jabbed family either got rapid onset dementia or absolute amnesia. Forgetting a whole year, major life changing events, it’s absolutely bizarre on one hand and completely sad for the dementia side of the family. Both sides are suffering in their own ways, but to completely forget very important life events has me completely speechless sometimes.
I bet WHs never force Big Pharma and FDA to reveal what is causing cancers and other diseases. It will be a slow reveal so people don't lose their shit when they find out their own govt has been killing them through various food and drugs. It'll be a 'woah they just discovered a cure!' type of thing I'm betting.
Anyone ever hear of a connection between J+J vax and onset of Parkinson's?
If the virus does it, then the clot shot does it 10x worse.
https://www1.racgp.org.au/newsgp/clinical/study-identifies-link-between-covid-19-and-parkins
I was just going to ask generally about Parkinson's, as a friend was recently diagnosed. I don't know if he was J&J or not though.
Yeah, I've got a colleague with early onset and he was a J&J vaxxer.
My friend too. He's never mentioned the vaccine. I don't think he's made any connection.
My asleep husband got the J&J. He is just beginning to get the hand tremors. He hasn't been diagnosed yet, but I suspect it to be early stage Parkinson's. I hope I'm wrong.