Anyone preaching accountability IS on our side to some extent. Did you ever see him once justify anybody's horrible behavior because they had a bad home life or got bullied or because society is racist? Could you imagine a leftist Dr. Phil where everything bad someone did was excused because it must have been because of misogyny or racism or a shitty home life?
Dr Phil was just on Joe Rogan talking about how China is invading the border and buying up land near military bases.
I have a feeling some of these are people getting smeared by foreign countries. China probably has beef with Dr. Phil. There's a information war on both sides.
Now I'm not saying that we couldn't either be controlling him or have replaced him, but I see EVERYONE taking this bait hook, line, and sinker.
Not sure how he flew under everyone's radar.
Though unless he does some follow up where he discovers that all those children did go to family members, then his voice reaches leftists like very few can.
I use CNN, MSNBC, Time, etc... When their articles put out bits of truth that can help me break the programming.
Maybe they have a long game to screw those trying to save children, maybe they have been replaced, maybe they are now freed from previous strings controlling them & are working for White Hats now, maybe they see the writing on the wall & are trying to get a big story before others start to accept it too to ride the cash that comes from being the spear tip on big stuff.
I'm noticing a trend here.... Rogan, Rosanne, Tucker and other hugely popular podcasts that attract a more MAGA audience have recently (since last Fall) given platforms to several personalities that anons have red flagged in the past.
Ramaswampy, Dr Phil, Alex Jones, Jack Posobitch, among others.
I'm reserving judgement, regarding a portion of it to simply being part of the movie(s), timeline, and/or nothing at all. Regardless, there is a pattern of injection to some of these guests and narratives.
I'm not afraid of platforming people who I don't always agree with.
It is a good thing to offer someone in good faith to explain their position on a subject, especially because conservatives tend to be more adamant in gathering actual facts about something instead of falling deeply into emotional response -- and therefore, we are generally more able to counter them.
It is even better when our counter arguments make them fly off the rails in front of thousands or even millions of viewers.
If a person got their own show on syndicated TV that aired on the big networks, then they are definitely being controlled by the dark forces in the shadows. Think of Oprah, Ellen, The View, etc.
Well, that wasn't at all what I was expecting. Skipped past all the Paris Hilton crap and imagine my shock and horror at 20:40 in when I learned the one of the punishments at the ranch was MANUAL LABOR. Like ewww, how dehumanizing. Sorry, the presenter seems like an insufferably annoying cunt and I'm not really able to watch her and for that reason, I'm out.
Yes of course it's not sending goons to literally drag kids out of their homes in the middle of the night, or the repeated accusations of rape and assault, or the starvation/dehydration rations, or the borderline mind control style tactics. Yeah it's definitely not all that and everyone's just super outraged over manual labor.
I mean seriously what kind of family do you think Paris Hilton and these other Hollywood types come out of? You think they'd send THEIR kid to some wholesome camp that teaches kids the value of hard work? 😂
Yeah, I've thought Dr. Phil was psycho for a while now. This helps to confirm that. One thing is for certain - Dr. Phil is very impressed with Dr. Phil.
Putting someone in the spot light usually means someone's going to get picked off. It's going to lead to someone or something to be exposed. Let's see what happens.
Who cares? If he's drawing attention to the right things it doesn't matter. Stop desperately trying to list team members it's irritating. Nobody is going to ask Dr. Phil to watch their kids, bro.
Who cares if Mitt Romney or Dan Crenshaw is a snake in the grass whose only goal is to make us look bad and screw us over when it really counts? Who cares if Fox News was just a bunch of liberals pretending to be conservative? As long as they say good things occasionally we should look the other way?
Allowing these sort of people to lead and represent us is how we got to this place. It's one thing to acknowledge what he's saying is true but another to just overlook the gigantic red flags.
Well...Fox News doesn't speak for us, nor do Mitt Romney or Dan Crenshaw, but if they or Fox News is currently saying something I agree with, in a way I agree with, I don't need chicken littles from the rafters screaming "He's not one of us! Don't be fooled!" every ten minutes. Why this is some giant fear for some of you--that we'll all be led back into the arms of Fox, Mitt, and Crenshaw, just because they say the right thing once in a while, is beyond me. Just like everyone else on this board, and you should have picked up on this by now, I don't trust ANYBODY completely. ANYBODY. Inasmuch as you say what I agree with, I will say so. Inasmuch as I trust you actually believe what you're saying I will say so. But "Who is and isn't a white hat" has become the most annoying game played on this site and those of us who have been here a while have grown tired of it. Play a new game already.
A guy practicing can only damage a couple thousand people. A guy with $400+ million and several million people watching him daily can do far more damage.
Jamie Dlux did a good piece on Dr. Phil. It's on bitchute and maybe YouTube. I'll see if I can find it, it's a couple years old but Jamie does good content.
He said something good and sometimes that disproportionately shifts perception.
Still, credit where it's due, he's correct about the harm "gender affirming care" does to kids so I will at least acknowledge that.
Unfortunately for him though, my ability to trust humanity is down to incredibly low levels so there is probably an angle for why he is saying that.
Anyone preaching accountability IS on our side to some extent. Did you ever see him once justify anybody's horrible behavior because they had a bad home life or got bullied or because society is racist? Could you imagine a leftist Dr. Phil where everything bad someone did was excused because it must have been because of misogyny or racism or a shitty home life?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mcd9dMi6Gg4
Here's Dr Phil on Joe Rogan talking about Chinese crossing the border illegally and buying up land near military installations. Just yesterday.
Dr Phil was just on Joe Rogan talking about how China is invading the border and buying up land near military bases.
I have a feeling some of these are people getting smeared by foreign countries. China probably has beef with Dr. Phil. There's a information war on both sides.
I don't believe everything on tiktok or YouTube
Now I'm not saying that we couldn't either be controlling him or have replaced him, but I see EVERYONE taking this bait hook, line, and sinker.
Not sure how he flew under everyone's radar.
So what exactly do you think he’s doing??
Though unless he does some follow up where he discovers that all those children did go to family members, then his voice reaches leftists like very few can.
I use CNN, MSNBC, Time, etc... When their articles put out bits of truth that can help me break the programming.
Maybe they have a long game to screw those trying to save children, maybe they have been replaced, maybe they are now freed from previous strings controlling them & are working for White Hats now, maybe they see the writing on the wall & are trying to get a big story before others start to accept it too to ride the cash that comes from being the spear tip on big stuff.
I'm noticing a trend here.... Rogan, Rosanne, Tucker and other hugely popular podcasts that attract a more MAGA audience have recently (since last Fall) given platforms to several personalities that anons have red flagged in the past.
Ramaswampy, Dr Phil, Alex Jones, Jack Posobitch, among others.
I'm reserving judgement, regarding a portion of it to simply being part of the movie(s), timeline, and/or nothing at all. Regardless, there is a pattern of injection to some of these guests and narratives.
I'm not afraid of platforming people who I don't always agree with.
It is a good thing to offer someone in good faith to explain their position on a subject, especially because conservatives tend to be more adamant in gathering actual facts about something instead of falling deeply into emotional response -- and therefore, we are generally more able to counter them.
It is even better when our counter arguments make them fly off the rails in front of thousands or even millions of viewers.
If a person got their own show on syndicated TV that aired on the big networks, then they are definitely being controlled by the dark forces in the shadows. Think of Oprah, Ellen, The View, etc.
Well, that wasn't at all what I was expecting. Skipped past all the Paris Hilton crap and imagine my shock and horror at 20:40 in when I learned the one of the punishments at the ranch was MANUAL LABOR. Like ewww, how dehumanizing. Sorry, the presenter seems like an insufferably annoying cunt and I'm not really able to watch her and for that reason, I'm out.
Yes of course it's not sending goons to literally drag kids out of their homes in the middle of the night, or the repeated accusations of rape and assault, or the starvation/dehydration rations, or the borderline mind control style tactics. Yeah it's definitely not all that and everyone's just super outraged over manual labor.
I mean seriously what kind of family do you think Paris Hilton and these other Hollywood types come out of? You think they'd send THEIR kid to some wholesome camp that teaches kids the value of hard work? 😂
He has a TV show. Syndicated. Should tell you all you need to know.
Yeah, I've thought Dr. Phil was psycho for a while now. This helps to confirm that. One thing is for certain - Dr. Phil is very impressed with Dr. Phil.
Putting someone in the spot light usually means someone's going to get picked off. It's going to lead to someone or something to be exposed. Let's see what happens.
Who cares? If he's drawing attention to the right things it doesn't matter. Stop desperately trying to list team members it's irritating. Nobody is going to ask Dr. Phil to watch their kids, bro.
Who cares if Mitt Romney or Dan Crenshaw is a snake in the grass whose only goal is to make us look bad and screw us over when it really counts? Who cares if Fox News was just a bunch of liberals pretending to be conservative? As long as they say good things occasionally we should look the other way?
Allowing these sort of people to lead and represent us is how we got to this place. It's one thing to acknowledge what he's saying is true but another to just overlook the gigantic red flags.
Well...Fox News doesn't speak for us, nor do Mitt Romney or Dan Crenshaw, but if they or Fox News is currently saying something I agree with, in a way I agree with, I don't need chicken littles from the rafters screaming "He's not one of us! Don't be fooled!" every ten minutes. Why this is some giant fear for some of you--that we'll all be led back into the arms of Fox, Mitt, and Crenshaw, just because they say the right thing once in a while, is beyond me. Just like everyone else on this board, and you should have picked up on this by now, I don't trust ANYBODY completely. ANYBODY. Inasmuch as you say what I agree with, I will say so. Inasmuch as I trust you actually believe what you're saying I will say so. But "Who is and isn't a white hat" has become the most annoying game played on this site and those of us who have been here a while have grown tired of it. Play a new game already.
He has always given me the "creeps"!!
He never gave me the creeps, he just struck me as a bully.
He is irrelevant. Hasn't had a license to practice since 06
A guy practicing can only damage a couple thousand people. A guy with $400+ million and several million people watching him daily can do far more damage.
Yet his show had "Dr. Phil" in the title until its demise last year.
Jamie Dlux did a good piece on Dr. Phil. It's on bitchute and maybe YouTube. I'll see if I can find it, it's a couple years old but Jamie does good content.