Not really, the media wants us to believe that all we care about is appearances. That is crap, I am seeing less and less makeup, mostly long lashes. My fashion is now called Boho, but I got to get my clothes out from high school. I am 65, and have always been part hippie, the ones my family hung out with were totally conservative.
I disagree with you on this. My husband is more emotional than I’ve ever been. He’s a strong man inside and out but he and his entire family will start crying over anything like weddings, graduations, funerals, milestones etc. Not me, I’m the one at the family funeral and functions making sure everything from the food, dishes and everything is taken care of. Even my own family’s funerals. I’m a damn rock and cry weeks later. Of course I care about people and things but in stressful times nope! It’s because I grew up fast in a verbal abusive family and had to be tough to survive. I know several men like my husband who shows empathy. If we start saying women can’t be vote because they are emotional where do you stop? Old people can’t vote because they don’t have the brain capacity as a thirty year old, 20 year olds can’t vote because they lack maturity, a person in psychiatric care can’t vote because they are unstable? I’m not trying to start an argument. I can disagree and respect your opinion.
They're doing what they've been programmed to do, plain and simple. Home school women aren't a different breed, for example, but they've been raised different. Put logic and reason back into the curricula, scientific method, investigation, teach proper research and critical thinking, everything resolves differently. MSM, social media, farming out our opinions to "experts" are what enslaved minds to the controlled narrative. Remove that and let people think again, both men and women. Now, on the flip side I'd say that only tax paying households should vote, and combat vets vote twice. But that's just me.
Proper education of how our government is supposed to work according the Constitution is key for the survival of our country. This is exactly what is needed.
The problems can happen with who makes the questions and who decides the correct answers. If limiting even one person's rights, then it's not a good law. Some states used to use different tests to limit people voting. Even if a person ---say an autist---can't read well, should they be banned from voting. Lets stick with the constitution for now, if we can get that enforced it would be huge.
Are you hearing yourself right now? How in the name of logic is a test adding you who you elected reps are unfair? How is someone who can't read well voting now? What are you on about mate? The Jim Crow stuff was before blacks were allowed to get an education. It is free now for everyone. Smdh
Unfortunately any sort of “test” (say, multiple choice or essay) is a Mike field of bias. Even MC tests are poor at best for evaluating knowledge or skills.
The issues with these sorts of evaluations are inherent in their design. By sitting for an exam, some will have enhanced performance, some perform the same, some (because of anxiety or other reasons) will have their performance decrease.
They possess the knowledge and skills, but having a sit down MC exam reduced their ability to recall or think critically. I don’t think that’s hard to understand. My concern is, how would anyone administer a test at that scale and not introduce biases? Haven’t even started talking about the issues with test question writers.
Every method used by modern public “education” has been shown, time and time and time again, to be the WORST methods for teaching or evaluation. Even by “scholars” and their “research” (I’m a PhD at a university - yes, I work on a ship that is sinking). Yet we continue to use those methods because … I have no idea why, unless we want to purposely ruin children.
Many of the Anons really are autistic, If they want to vote I think our Autists deserve it. Limits on who can vote when implemented beyond the constitution have historically been bad. The south used tests to limit the ex slaves, used again for years whenever the deep state could get away with it. Right now if they started limiting voters, MAGA would be at the top of the list, then Christians, Jews, Muslims, or any non government religion.
If the constitutional laws were followed there would be no problem.
Not any woman I know. We discuss candidates pros and cons. If my husband tried to tell me who to vote for, let's just say he won't. He and I are unified politically. I got involved first and then he did. He serves on committees and I do the research.
I think the family division began in earnest in the 1970s when every show on tv made SAHMs look stupid. Cannot tell you how many arguments I've had with people who told me I should work outside of our home.
I am a woman and I agree. I always said women should never vote. They vote emotion and looks.
I disagree. I vote independently for candidates after thoroughly researching. I am Independent and love President Trump!
Me too! But hubbie would vote based on my input. Family vote.
You and I are a rare breed.
Just the two of you huh??
Nope me too. Female boomer Independent Trump voter.
She was the only one who replied.
You have to admit there are few and far between.
Not really, the media wants us to believe that all we care about is appearances. That is crap, I am seeing less and less makeup, mostly long lashes. My fashion is now called Boho, but I got to get my clothes out from high school. I am 65, and have always been part hippie, the ones my family hung out with were totally conservative.
Around me there is makeup like they ate Hollywood stars.
I am the same age range and I need some foundation because my skin color is so light now it looks awful.
I disagree with you on this. My husband is more emotional than I’ve ever been. He’s a strong man inside and out but he and his entire family will start crying over anything like weddings, graduations, funerals, milestones etc. Not me, I’m the one at the family funeral and functions making sure everything from the food, dishes and everything is taken care of. Even my own family’s funerals. I’m a damn rock and cry weeks later. Of course I care about people and things but in stressful times nope! It’s because I grew up fast in a verbal abusive family and had to be tough to survive. I know several men like my husband who shows empathy. If we start saying women can’t be vote because they are emotional where do you stop? Old people can’t vote because they don’t have the brain capacity as a thirty year old, 20 year olds can’t vote because they lack maturity, a person in psychiatric care can’t vote because they are unstable? I’m not trying to start an argument. I can disagree and respect your opinion.
Again the majority of woman vote on emotions and looks and don't forget abortions.
There are more of them than us.
They're doing what they've been programmed to do, plain and simple. Home school women aren't a different breed, for example, but they've been raised different. Put logic and reason back into the curricula, scientific method, investigation, teach proper research and critical thinking, everything resolves differently. MSM, social media, farming out our opinions to "experts" are what enslaved minds to the controlled narrative. Remove that and let people think again, both men and women. Now, on the flip side I'd say that only tax paying households should vote, and combat vets vote twice. But that's just me.
I agree with tax payers only voting and vets.
How was I able not to be programmed and think for myself?
I was pregnant at 20 and I had more sense than most including how I raised my two children.
Proper education of how our government is supposed to work according the Constitution is key for the survival of our country. This is exactly what is needed.
Can't say I disagree
The civics quiz requirement would indeed filter out a lot of bad quality votes.
The problems can happen with who makes the questions and who decides the correct answers. If limiting even one person's rights, then it's not a good law. Some states used to use different tests to limit people voting. Even if a person ---say an autist---can't read well, should they be banned from voting. Lets stick with the constitution for now, if we can get that enforced it would be huge.
Are you hearing yourself right now? How in the name of logic is a test adding you who you elected reps are unfair? How is someone who can't read well voting now? What are you on about mate? The Jim Crow stuff was before blacks were allowed to get an education. It is free now for everyone. Smdh
I agree excellent points.
Unfortunately any sort of “test” (say, multiple choice or essay) is a Mike field of bias. Even MC tests are poor at best for evaluating knowledge or skills.
What? Basic civics- what are the branches of government, who is your mayor, governor, senator, president...
The issues with these sorts of evaluations are inherent in their design. By sitting for an exam, some will have enhanced performance, some perform the same, some (because of anxiety or other reasons) will have their performance decrease.
They possess the knowledge and skills, but having a sit down MC exam reduced their ability to recall or think critically. I don’t think that’s hard to understand. My concern is, how would anyone administer a test at that scale and not introduce biases? Haven’t even started talking about the issues with test question writers.
Every method used by modern public “education” has been shown, time and time and time again, to be the WORST methods for teaching or evaluation. Even by “scholars” and their “research” (I’m a PhD at a university - yes, I work on a ship that is sinking). Yet we continue to use those methods because … I have no idea why, unless we want to purposely ruin children.
Many of the Anons really are autistic, If they want to vote I think our Autists deserve it. Limits on who can vote when implemented beyond the constitution have historically been bad. The south used tests to limit the ex slaves, used again for years whenever the deep state could get away with it. Right now if they started limiting voters, MAGA would be at the top of the list, then Christians, Jews, Muslims, or any non government religion.
If the constitutional laws were followed there would be no problem.
Not any woman I know. We discuss candidates pros and cons. If my husband tried to tell me who to vote for, let's just say he won't. He and I are unified politically. I got involved first and then he did. He serves on committees and I do the research.
I think the family division began in earnest in the 1970s when every show on tv made SAHMs look stupid. Cannot tell you how many arguments I've had with people who told me I should work outside of our home.
I know there are many woman who think for themselves.
The MAJORITY don't.