$540K is extremely high compared to a normal wage. If someone is making far beyond the standard market value of their work, I would call that "for profit".
540,000 a year isn't out of the norm for a COO and Treasurer for a large organization.
I really don't like the idea that there is something wrong with people making a large salary. It seems sort of....communist to me. Sounds a lot like stuff liberals talk about, salary caps and such.
And things like this are always subjecte. If you're making 60k a year, sure, 540k a year seems excessive. But if you're homeless, 60k a year seems excessive. It's just what you, personally, are accustomed to.
If it were a conservative doing that job, would you feel the same way?
I think it is excessive if the salary is paid by money taken through taxation or if the organization is promoted as "non profit" or charitable, when donations are collected.
Why should people earning 60K be taxed to pay a, likely less capable, person 540k? If you watch the Bud Light head of marketing's interview, you may end up realizing a lot of C-suit people are either retarded or corrupt.
The idea that we are in a merit based system is a lie, told to encourage slaves to work harder.
Dude, is this the first time you've ever heard about people working for nonprofits making big bucks? If you think that nonprofits are the only organizations who benefit from taxpayers dollars and whose executives make piles of bank, you must not pay much attention.
I didn't say that many of them weren't corrupt or incompetent. Just that the idea of saying someone is making too much money is a bit communist.
If you want to start campaigning for salary caps and crying about how Capitalism works, I'm sure the liberals will welcome you with open arms and big wet slobbery kisses.
People always have the misconception that “non-profit” equals reeled in and contained expenses. What it means is that they have to spend what they take in.
“Schumer” and “Weinshall” are both ostensibly German names. Lots of names are, actually.
Flash back to Blazing Saddles. Considering a lot of things about that movie, why did a troupe of WWI picklehat wearing Prussian Germans come out behind Madeleine Kahn during the burlesque scene that’s set in the Wild West?
Something is hidden in Germany.
Linked, but unrelated, Iris’ replacement at NY DOT is a lady named Janette Sadik-Khan. Well ok, that’s odd. She’s married to a man named Mark Geistfeld. WHY does this woman have that last name?
Even reading the explanation doesn’t stop the double-takes.
Sadik-Khan was born in San Francisco, California, and moved to New York City as a child. She is the daughter of Orhan Idris Sadik-Khan (1929-2007), managing director of UBS Paine Webber, and his first wife Jane McCarthy, an environmental pioneer, one of the founders of Citizens for Clean Air in NYC, an urban preservationist, Chief Administrator Officer at the Municipal Art Society, and currently an advocate for criminal justice reform. Orhan Sadik-Khan was born in Finland,[3] and grew up in Berlin and Cairo, son of Afghan (Tatar) parents; his father was the imam Alimjan Idris,[4] and his mother a paediatrician.
I would consider this a soft type book deal. And I bet she'd be in charge of book selections for the NYPB system, too, with that kind of salary. If not in charge, then definitely would have a highly influential role in the selection process.
Oh he makes that much and more with bribes from Lobbyists, the Deep State and insider trading. Who makes that much at a Public Library is what I want to know.
Many years ago I used to follow the "climate debate". I became convinced back then that non-profits were just one way to launder money.
Non-profits are supposed to be not political but you ca get round that by setting up a parallel limited liability company with the same name and working from the same offices with the same personnel. Just ask Greenpeace.
A non-profit will hide the route the money is taking. For instance, a $billionaire might give a pile of cash to a non-profit and that non-profit might just happen to donate that cash to a science project that produces the "right" answers. That is definitely not the billionaire giving the scientists money because the non-profit can donate to whomsoever they please - but who knows what back-door deals have been struck?
Non-profits also provide a feel good factor as in: Look at me, I am not working for one of those evil money-making, capitalist corporations - they still pay me $120,000 a year, though, and many of my family and friends as well.
Well.. that explains the investment officer, then. He's carrying this whole rotten fucked up organization on his back. While losing $220M a year overall for the organization, which entitled him to a $600k bonus at the end of the year. What a guy.
"Wife" is a bit of a stretch. Check this thing out and see for yourself:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/NINTCHDBPICT000460047060.jpg
“Wife” is a bit of a stretch. Check this thing out and see for yourself:
https://greatawakening.win/p/17s5tl32GI/follow-the-wives/c/
Her bulge is bigger than his.
Normal crime for dudes that look like a lady.
Damn I didn’t think that bitch could read
Sorry I mean man
$540K is a massive profit. I wish I made a profit like that from my job.
Do you think everyone that works at a non-profit works for free? Non-profit doesn't mean they don't get paid.
$540K is extremely high compared to a normal wage. If someone is making far beyond the standard market value of their work, I would call that "for profit".
540,000 a year isn't out of the norm for a COO and Treasurer for a large organization.
I really don't like the idea that there is something wrong with people making a large salary. It seems sort of....communist to me. Sounds a lot like stuff liberals talk about, salary caps and such.
And things like this are always subjecte. If you're making 60k a year, sure, 540k a year seems excessive. But if you're homeless, 60k a year seems excessive. It's just what you, personally, are accustomed to.
If it were a conservative doing that job, would you feel the same way?
I think it is excessive if the salary is paid by money taken through taxation or if the organization is promoted as "non profit" or charitable, when donations are collected.
Why should people earning 60K be taxed to pay a, likely less capable, person 540k? If you watch the Bud Light head of marketing's interview, you may end up realizing a lot of C-suit people are either retarded or corrupt.
The idea that we are in a merit based system is a lie, told to encourage slaves to work harder.
Dude, is this the first time you've ever heard about people working for nonprofits making big bucks? If you think that nonprofits are the only organizations who benefit from taxpayers dollars and whose executives make piles of bank, you must not pay much attention.
I didn't say that many of them weren't corrupt or incompetent. Just that the idea of saying someone is making too much money is a bit communist.
If you want to start campaigning for salary caps and crying about how Capitalism works, I'm sure the liberals will welcome you with open arms and big wet slobbery kisses.
People always have the misconception that “non-profit” equals reeled in and contained expenses. What it means is that they have to spend what they take in.
what it means is money laundering device.
https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/status/1769770898934964418
“Schumer” and “Weinshall” are both ostensibly German names. Lots of names are, actually.
Flash back to Blazing Saddles. Considering a lot of things about that movie, why did a troupe of WWI picklehat wearing Prussian Germans come out behind Madeleine Kahn during the burlesque scene that’s set in the Wild West?
Something is hidden in Germany.
Linked, but unrelated, Iris’ replacement at NY DOT is a lady named Janette Sadik-Khan. Well ok, that’s odd. She’s married to a man named Mark Geistfeld. WHY does this woman have that last name?
Even reading the explanation doesn’t stop the double-takes.
That is just… wow.
I would consider this a soft type book deal. And I bet she'd be in charge of book selections for the NYPB system, too, with that kind of salary. If not in charge, then definitely would have a highly influential role in the selection process.
it earns more than POTUS.
Oh he makes that much and more with bribes from Lobbyists, the Deep State and insider trading. Who makes that much at a Public Library is what I want to know.
DQHD - Drag Queen Hiring Director?
Wife? That's a dude!
Many years ago I used to follow the "climate debate". I became convinced back then that non-profits were just one way to launder money.
Non-profits are supposed to be not political but you ca get round that by setting up a parallel limited liability company with the same name and working from the same offices with the same personnel. Just ask Greenpeace.
A non-profit will hide the route the money is taking. For instance, a $billionaire might give a pile of cash to a non-profit and that non-profit might just happen to donate that cash to a science project that produces the "right" answers. That is definitely not the billionaire giving the scientists money because the non-profit can donate to whomsoever they please - but who knows what back-door deals have been struck?
Non-profits also provide a feel good factor as in: Look at me, I am not working for one of those evil money-making, capitalist corporations - they still pay me $120,000 a year, though, and many of my family and friends as well.
And HE'S worth every penny.
It's not even the best part of their form 990.
Fundraising Events: $3.2M
Government Grants: $258M (fuck)
Private Gifts: $63M
Investment Income: $2.4M
Sales Income: $75M
What a total shitshow on costs, too:
Organization Grants: $60k (yep, thousand)
Personal Grants: $2M (lol, wut?)
Salaries: $121M
Pensions: $17M
Benefits: $27M
Rent: $30M
Interest: $7M
Depretation: $26M
Total Expenses: $307M
Holding:
$2.6B in private assets and investments.
Well.. that explains the investment officer, then. He's carrying this whole rotten fucked up organization on his back. While losing $220M a year overall for the organization, which entitled him to a $600k bonus at the end of the year. What a guy.
The whole long form joke, if you're into that sort of thing.. https://drupal.nypl.org/sites-drupal/default/files/2023-05/NYPL%202022%20990%20Form.pdf
Not bad for 15hrs a week. That dude is bringing home the bacon.
Uh, it's 540,000 a year. Not 540,000,000 a year.
Spelling is racist, err counting. Bigot!