"Loy, Raland, Deron and Gaynor Brunson (the brothers) witnessed the 2020 election along with claims from members of congress that the election was rigged."
"Is this lawsuit about a rigged election? No, it's about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES."
Wow. I’m no lawfag…but this Looks legit on the Supreme Court website. Writ of certiorari issued 3/29/24 (lower courts ordered to provide all documents to the Supreme Court); and docketed.
A writ of certiorari has not issued. The 3/29/2024 thing in the docket is a petition for a writ of certiorari, something that Brunson wrote and sent to the court asking them to grant cert. Listed on the court website just means that Brunson filled out the right forms and sent them to the right address. The lower court hasn’t been ordered to do anything.
It’s easy to read too much into this. “Now in the Supreme Court” means exactly nothing.
Yes, the case is on the Supreme Court docket, but that just means that Brunson mailed the right forms to the right address. No one at the court has even looked at the case yet (except the low-level clerk who stamped it with a docket number without reading it) and no one will until it is scheduled for conference.
That’s a different case, 22-1028 in which the court denied Brunson’s appeal of a 10th circuit ruling. The one in the OP of this thread is 23-1073, appealing a different 10th circuit ruling.
I did some Yandex (no filter) searching and found what this is all about.
https://ralandbrunson.com/
"Loy, Raland, Deron and Gaynor Brunson (the brothers) witnessed the 2020 election along with claims from members of congress that the election was rigged."
"Is this lawsuit about a rigged election? No, it's about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES."
Funny nobody in the MSM is freaking out and coming up with stories like "MAGA republicans plan insurrection on SCOTUS"
This will turn out to be a nothing burger. Only Thomas and one other one maybe has the brassy ones to stand up. The rest are heal hounds.
And the Removal of three Leftists from SCOTUS will only get us three more Leftists....
nope
this is the correct answer
Can you provide some information Anon and give us a summary? I’d like to Sticky this, if a bit more info, and a better link than FB added.
This appears to be the sauce: https://enoughisenough.me/
Thank you Anon! 😁😁 I was hoping the OP would put it up too so we can sticky it up and keep the link at the top.
The FB link isn’t the best to use. And not everyone has FB or access to their page/site World-Wide.
and this seems to be the case number? https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-1073.html
Sticky this right up under the top. By hitting that sticky button.
which one do i click on for that?
permalink parent save report block delete edit reply
I also thought that when i posted under link, the screenshot would show like it does for X. that would have helped everyone.
Am surprised that they haven't been thrown out for "standing". Because reasons.
Wow. I’m no lawfag…but this Looks legit on the Supreme Court website. Writ of certiorari issued 3/29/24 (lower courts ordered to provide all documents to the Supreme Court); and docketed.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-1073.html
I just read his petition at that link. It is gibberish.
That sounds disappointing. Thanks for looking at it tho. I’m certainly not the one to be accurately interpreting legal documents.
I was excited to find it and was similarly disappointed.
A writ of certiorari has not issued. The 3/29/2024 thing in the docket is a petition for a writ of certiorari, something that Brunson wrote and sent to the court asking them to grant cert. Listed on the court website just means that Brunson filled out the right forms and sent them to the right address. The lower court hasn’t been ordered to do anything.
Also disappointing.
It’s easy to read too much into this. “Now in the Supreme Court” means exactly nothing.
Yes, the case is on the Supreme Court docket, but that just means that Brunson mailed the right forms to the right address. No one at the court has even looked at the case yet (except the low-level clerk who stamped it with a docket number without reading it) and no one will until it is scheduled for conference.
Remove them on January 4.
Why wait..
So Trump gets to pick the replacements.
Court case docket enter text
That’s a different case, 22-1028 in which the court denied Brunson’s appeal of a 10th circuit ruling. The one in the OP of this thread is 23-1073, appealing a different 10th circuit ruling.
Part of the confusion is that there are a few suits that they've tried with everything in different stages along the way.
Raland uses facebook.
interesting….following