https://ianbrighthope.substack.com/p/mrna-is-a-class-one-carcinogen
(Found cross-posted by Dr. Jessica Rose, who introduces the link by saying "I literally said this yesterday").
This substack column is particularly important given that Big Pharma and Big Food are working feverishly to use mRNA in, apparently, everything.
For a quick summary in support of that (admittedly hyperbolic) assertion, I asked Leo, the Brave browser AI, "What products are mRNA being used in or considered to be used in?" and got the following reply:
mRNA technology is being explored for various products, including vaccines, cancer treatments, and gene therapies. Some companies are also investigating its use in agriculture and food production. However, it's important to note that most of these products are still in development and have not yet been approved for widespread use.
Ian's column includes detail about carcinogenicity and how various authorities define "carcinogenic" and provides some evidence (a very small amount compared to the totality of what is out there) that the mRNA "vaccines" are indeed carcinogenic. Below, the Conclusion:
CONCLUSION
Statistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer and some specific types of cancer, namely, ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers, were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of SARS- CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine. These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination rather than COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown.
Commentary by Dr. John Campbell: (embedded YouTube video of Dr. Campbell speaking on the subject follows)
The J&J jab did not use mRNA technology.
All who took the J&J jab should still be cautious but my understanding is that it does not appear to yield the same, in severity or like, problems as mRNA tech.
Not a medical professional and not giving advice.
This is the misconception everyone thinks with the J&J.
If you listen to the doctors like Dr. Tenpenny she stated they are exactly the same thing.
The only difference is the delivery system.
Everyone keeps saying they are not mRNA. THEY ARE.
This is true.
The patented nano lipid protein is the delivery vehicle.
Wasn't J&J the shot that President Trump "warp speeded" to the public? Didn't the other companies have to immediately roll out their own products (as if they had just finished developing them) lest they lose the entire global market for a jab to J&J? .
By the way, my take on "Warp Speed" has always been that President Trump had leverage over J&J that prevented them from deliberately holding back their vaxx in order to prolong the pandemic. J&J had done a lot of damage to the trusting public long before Covid.
President Trump would only have to get one company to release its jab for all the others to suddenly announce they had jabs of their own ready to sell.
That's my understanding as well. If you absolutely positively had no other choice than to get the jab for whatever reason, that was the one to get.
However, it was still using the spike protein which is a toxin and consequently there was still serious risk of inflammation & clotting. You just weren't at risk from whatever programming the RNA is doing to your DNA with the other jabs.
This is the misconception everyone thinks with the J&J.
If you listen to the doctors like Dr. Tenpenny she stated they are exactly the same thing.
The only difference is the delivery system.
Everyone keeps saying they are not mRNA. THEY ARE.
They are two separate delivery technologies.
By definition they are NOT both mRNA "vaccines".
J&J is a vector virus delivery system where as Moderna and Pfizer are using the mRNA delivery system.
That is not to say that either one is less harmful than the other.
As of now and all I have heard is that the mRNA technology is the worst of the two since the delivery technology (vehicle) itself contains harmful components aside from instructing your biology to create the spike protein which itself is also harmful to your biology.
In other words, mRNA technology has the harmful spike protein synthesis with the added toxin of the delivery mechanism. J&J appears to only have the spike protein synthesis.
I, of course, am always willing to entertain new information. Including any information that may not be convenient. So if indeed, end result, is one in the same, it should be known in order for all to be in a better place to protect themselves and their loved ones.
Yes they are. Look up Dr. Tenpenny and her work on these vaxxes.
J&J has mRNA.
Several doctors have reported this.
I found this.
All three vaccines deliver genetic material to your cells: mRNA vaccines deliver mRNA, and Johnson & Johnson delivers DNA.
https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/how-the-johnson-johnson-covid-19-vaccine-works
Rockz, not disagreeing with you but could you provide some data? I've spent literally hundreds of hours researching the C19 crime and every bit of data has pointed to the J&J shot being very dangerous for the reason I detailed in my original comment, but not using MRNA.
MRNA IS THE DELIVERY SYSTEM for the pfizer and moderna "vaccines". J&J does not use MRNA as a delivery system, it uses a disabled adenovirus to deliver the instructions. Both methods are extremely dangerous because they're programming your cells to produce spike protein for your immune system to react to. But every bit of research I've done points to a very distinct difference in these two methods.
I will reiterate: I do not endorse any of these death shots. But I stand by my original statement in that the J&J shot is slightly less lethal/dangerous than the MRNA-based shots.
https://www.vcuhealth.org/news/covid-19/johnson-and-johnson-vaccine-how-is-it-different#:~:text=What%20is%20the%20difference%20between,more%20traditional%20virus-based%20technology.
I remember Dr Tenpenny saying that is no different. It destroys the DNA the same way.
I looked for the video but can't find it now because you know how they pulled so much of that off the internet.