I tell everyone we get on the subject of Q that this is what was at stake in 2016. If HRC became president, Russia would be destroyed because of a dirty bomb detonated in Europe using the uranium sold to the Ukranians and Russians by Biden, HRC, and Hussein. When it goes off, it's traced to that uranium and they say, "see it was putin!" Thwres WW3
Yup, true story... was so serious if trump hadn't won Obama would have experienced a military coup to stop Hillary from having a false flag nuke set off. Likely here in the u.s. and blame the Russians like teppishfressher said.
🚨"I've got defense analysts feeding me information and they're... saying that there is going to be a nuclear detonation in Europe."🚨
Independent Member of UK Parliament Andrew Bridgen (@ABridgen) tells Resistance GB (@GbResistance) jjournalist Will Coleshill that defense analysts have told him that "there is going to be a nuclear detonation in Europe," which will be used as a false flag to kick off WWIII.
"If [Putin] goes nuclear, no one's winning, are they?" Bridgen says, noting that he thinks Putin would use a nuclear weapon if need be. Bridgen adds, "I've got defense analysts feeding me information and they're in, you know, services, and they're saying that there is going to be a nuclear detonation in Europe."
The MP goes on to say that "[I]t could be a dirty bomb" and that "there's a lot of nuclear material floating around in Ukraine from their nuclear reactors" that could be used for such a bomb.
"I mean, to create contamination, all you need is some conventional explosives and some nuclear material and you've got a dirty bomb," Bridgen says. "They may have already been set off in the Donbas area now."
"There's many ways it can be done," the MP adds. He notes that the false flag would be akin to 9/11 in that it would be used as the impetus to initiate war.
If there's a lot of nuclear material floating around from their reactors, why exactly are we giving them billions of dollars cash money and in high tech weapons? Demonstrably they can't even secure said material.
FYI Bridgen was conservative MP who repeatedly questioned the Vaccine injuries and brought it up in parliament, and other truths. He was kicked out the conservatives so is now an independent.
I would trust him, but the system is likely feeding him miss-information to label a crackpot / conspiracy theorist. I believe in the same interview he also brings up child trafficking.
The only people who will be detonating nukes or any kind of false flag will be the same globohomo cabal spooks and kooks who have declared undeclared war against the citizens of the world via false flags since forever - assuming it is even possible to make and set off nuclear bombs because if you spend enough time down the “nukes don’t exist” rabbit hole, you may have second thoughts…
There is a subtle difference between an atom bomb and a nuclear bomb. A dive down the rabbit hole suggests that fast nuclear fission, as purportedly used in an atom bomb, is not possible, but slow nuclear fission, as used in a nuclear reactor is possible.
A nuclear bomb that's built using a traditional explosive core with a uranium or plutonium payload is still easily possible. In fact, given the performance of DU ammo, I suspect that 'tactical nukes' are in fact state-of-the-art nuclear bombs. Trad core surrounded by finely milled uranium, which is directed by the explosion and has a radiation footprint. Easily sold to the man in the street as a nuclear bomb. This is what a limited nuclear war will look like.
The fission process used in atom / nuclear bombs (no distinction in terminology) and reactors is the same process. In the bomb, the reaction is allowed to proceed in chain fashion with neutrons multiplying at each fission event in a runaway process. In the reactor, the neutrons are "moderated" to prevent a chain runaway, by absorbing them and changing their energy (temperature). Almost no uranium or plutonium is left over from a nuclear detonation (but there are fission products).
If it IS a "dirty bomb," that will be prima facie evidence of a false provocation. Dirty bombs have no military purpose. Not everyone is so stupid as to think that cartoon plots are serious military actions.
If he thinks it would be at Putin's behest then he is very stupid.
I tell everyone we get on the subject of Q that this is what was at stake in 2016. If HRC became president, Russia would be destroyed because of a dirty bomb detonated in Europe using the uranium sold to the Ukranians and Russians by Biden, HRC, and Hussein. When it goes off, it's traced to that uranium and they say, "see it was putin!" Thwres WW3
Yup, true story... was so serious if trump hadn't won Obama would have experienced a military coup to stop Hillary from having a false flag nuke set off. Likely here in the u.s. and blame the Russians like teppishfressher said.
Sum of All Fears. Nessum Dorma
Crimea FF from Ukraine and they will spin it to something like "he was losing it so he made sure Ukraine can't get it" bullshit..
🚨"I've got defense analysts feeding me information and they're... saying that there is going to be a nuclear detonation in Europe."🚨
Independent Member of UK Parliament Andrew Bridgen (@ABridgen) tells Resistance GB (@GbResistance) jjournalist Will Coleshill that defense analysts have told him that "there is going to be a nuclear detonation in Europe," which will be used as a false flag to kick off WWIII.
"If [Putin] goes nuclear, no one's winning, are they?" Bridgen says, noting that he thinks Putin would use a nuclear weapon if need be. Bridgen adds, "I've got defense analysts feeding me information and they're in, you know, services, and they're saying that there is going to be a nuclear detonation in Europe."
The MP goes on to say that "[I]t could be a dirty bomb" and that "there's a lot of nuclear material floating around in Ukraine from their nuclear reactors" that could be used for such a bomb.
"I mean, to create contamination, all you need is some conventional explosives and some nuclear material and you've got a dirty bomb," Bridgen says. "They may have already been set off in the Donbas area now."
"There's many ways it can be done," the MP adds. He notes that the false flag would be akin to 9/11 in that it would be used as the impetus to initiate war.
If there's a lot of nuclear material floating around from their reactors, why exactly are we giving them billions of dollars cash money and in high tech weapons? Demonstrably they can't even secure said material.
This information just doesn't sound right. Sounds like a Cheap-false-fake-flag.
Source: "Trust me broski"
FYI Bridgen was conservative MP who repeatedly questioned the Vaccine injuries and brought it up in parliament, and other truths. He was kicked out the conservatives so is now an independent. I would trust him, but the system is likely feeding him miss-information to label a crackpot / conspiracy theorist. I believe in the same interview he also brings up child trafficking.
I am not convinced Andrew Bridgen is our friend.
For some good context on him from an excellent UK writer, I recommend reading this - including the links she uses and the notes/comments on the article: https://open.substack.com/pub/miri/p/a-bridgen-way-too-far?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios
The only people who will be detonating nukes or any kind of false flag will be the same globohomo cabal spooks and kooks who have declared undeclared war against the citizens of the world via false flags since forever - assuming it is even possible to make and set off nuclear bombs because if you spend enough time down the “nukes don’t exist” rabbit hole, you may have second thoughts…
There is a subtle difference between an atom bomb and a nuclear bomb. A dive down the rabbit hole suggests that fast nuclear fission, as purportedly used in an atom bomb, is not possible, but slow nuclear fission, as used in a nuclear reactor is possible.
A nuclear bomb that's built using a traditional explosive core with a uranium or plutonium payload is still easily possible. In fact, given the performance of DU ammo, I suspect that 'tactical nukes' are in fact state-of-the-art nuclear bombs. Trad core surrounded by finely milled uranium, which is directed by the explosion and has a radiation footprint. Easily sold to the man in the street as a nuclear bomb. This is what a limited nuclear war will look like.
The fission process used in atom / nuclear bombs (no distinction in terminology) and reactors is the same process. In the bomb, the reaction is allowed to proceed in chain fashion with neutrons multiplying at each fission event in a runaway process. In the reactor, the neutrons are "moderated" to prevent a chain runaway, by absorbing them and changing their energy (temperature). Almost no uranium or plutonium is left over from a nuclear detonation (but there are fission products).
this was an amazing interview
If it's a prediction, it's analysis.
If it is "going to be", then it's intelligence.
Do analysts always have intelligence? Surely analysts deal only in potentials, not in actualities.
If it IS a "dirty bomb," that will be prima facie evidence of a false provocation. Dirty bombs have no military purpose. Not everyone is so stupid as to think that cartoon plots are serious military actions.
DOES SOMEONE REALLY WANT THIS OUT? 15 MIN OF FAME? SHAME!
Didn't watch the clip but can we cast our votes for detonation target? City of London, anybody? Anybody?