Chevron OVERTURNED
(www.supremecourt.gov)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (78)
sorted by:
I read somewhere on X this morning that one of the most important things Trump asked prospective Supreme Court nominees was how they interpret the Chevron Deference.
This will be a big part of Trump's legacy.
Didn't help. Leftist Justice Jackson joined the majority opinion, and Trump's Justice Barrett dissented with Sotomayor and Kagan. Where does that leave things?
It appears Barrett is defaulting to the Catholic WEF stance linked to the globalists. She is becoming Nixon's Breyer for Trump (an embarrassment/big mistake).
I hate to say it but she’s not what she pretended to br
But everyone who criticized her was baaad.
I think there's more to her than meets the eye.
Subterfuge & infiltration...
Some have hinted that she is the spitting image of bidens ex-wife and could potentially be his daughter, Amy... however that's wack a doodle.
What screams out to me is her Haitian adopted kids ... The Haiti connection AND anybody try to adopt a kid from ANYWHERE in the past 20 years? Nearly impossible with a huge wait period AND huge "donation" per child.
I'm like WTF is wrong with this picture here? "Oh she's just super Catholic or whatever and has connections... yeah... like who? The Jesuits? The black pope?
Like I said... stinks to high heaven.
America makes it very hard to adopt unless you're rich, yet it's much easier to adopt kids from other countries. Parents that want kids often go this route because it also gives then the satisfaction of knowing they not only gained a child, but they also saved them from a 3rd world hellhole.
Allegedly Barrett and Roberts have those sketchy adoptions hanging over their heads.
Was watching a mash up of Trump saying "central casting" it even included clips of him saying this about Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. Was watching an unrelated video of some guys going over old Q posts. This one guy thinks the SC is being run by the military and these decisions are theirs based on the Constitution. Is that true? Maybe, we are watching a movie after all.
Jeez Ang - I would love that to be the "case" 😁
Yeah her dissent is disappointing. She seems to have bought the media's narrative of what happened on Jan 6.
So.....IIRC; this is absolutely MONUMENTAL news to get it overturned, right?????
It's a massive blow to the administrative state. Government agencies, as part of the Executive Branch, creates their own often time far-reaching regulations based on their interpretations of laws passed by Congress.
OSHA unilaterally mandated tens of millions of private sector workers wear masks or get the Covid vaccine. Appellate courts allowed it citing the Chevron Deference.
https://x.com/gregg_re/status/1806786881180328427
^^^^THIS. Also sets the stage for SCOTUS (Article3) to put smackdown on Congress (Article1) for their usurpation of judicial powers per Admin Procedures Act of June 11, 1946 that established the unconstitutional Federal Rules for Civil Procedure. Potential strikedown possible under similar violation of Separation of Powers argument.
We would default back to Common Law Rules of 1912, preventing use of “administrative actions” to violate Bill of Rights.
The deference, set in 1984 in a case involving the oil giant, gave federal agencies wide powers to interpret laws and decide the best ways to apply them. In ending the deference, the conservative-majority court has slashed and severely weakened the powers of agencies including the Environmental Protection Agency