I understand. Right here on this board I urged people over and over to use the constitution to assert their rights. So many said, but I just want a religious exemption. Nobody needed a religious exemption, or a medical exemption or any other kind. All they needed was the protection of the Constitution. Another thing I have said repeatedly on this board is that we have so many 'illegal' laws on the books in our country. If a law is repugnant to the Constitution, it is an illegal law. An unconstitutional congress and baloney bureaucracy helped create illegal laws. Congress was lazy and abdicated their responsibility. Somebody said it's just about regulations. Well, what are regulations and mandates other than illegals laws - by another name.
Congress was lazy and abdicated their responsibility.
Not sure that was the case. My guess is that radicals in congress purposely created vague laws so their radical minions in the agencies could define them. This makes it such that they can say they didn't vote for this radical stuff as it was the bureaucrats which make the decisions.
Yup. When the libs want another govt intrusion, they will have to get Congress to pass it. Congress doesn't have the time or the balls to explicitly pass everything the left wants. Also, a lot more of the senior service Fed employees won't be needed to make up and then enforce regulations.
Yes. I really doubt the constitutionality of the “deal” our government made with big pharma saying a private citizen cannot sue them for damages. How can the government negotiate away our rights?
If it’s the government doing it, that’s well and good. I advocated the same to government employees.
If it’s your “private” corporate job doing it in proxy for the government, little different situation.
Wouldn’t arguing constitutional rights to a private business require leaning on employment statutes that are already unconstitutional? Seems like shaky ground.
Religious exemption is indeed begging for breadcrumbs, I agree, but sometimes just gotta go with what works, take the W, and work on being better prepared next time.
I understand. Right here on this board I urged people over and over to use the constitution to assert their rights. So many said, but I just want a religious exemption. Nobody needed a religious exemption, or a medical exemption or any other kind. All they needed was the protection of the Constitution. Another thing I have said repeatedly on this board is that we have so many 'illegal' laws on the books in our country. If a law is repugnant to the Constitution, it is an illegal law. An unconstitutional congress and baloney bureaucracy helped create illegal laws. Congress was lazy and abdicated their responsibility. Somebody said it's just about regulations. Well, what are regulations and mandates other than illegals laws - by another name.
Not sure that was the case. My guess is that radicals in congress purposely created vague laws so their radical minions in the agencies could define them. This makes it such that they can say they didn't vote for this radical stuff as it was the bureaucrats which make the decisions.
Exactly. The 'lazy' & 'incompetence' defence doesn't work anymore.
THEY WERE ALWAYS MALICIOUS, WITH INTENT.
All the shit that happened was planned, not a random consequence of incompetence. It was a desired consequence of intentional malice.
The 'idiot' defense is over. We see them for what they are and reject them.
Yup. When the libs want another govt intrusion, they will have to get Congress to pass it. Congress doesn't have the time or the balls to explicitly pass everything the left wants. Also, a lot more of the senior service Fed employees won't be needed to make up and then enforce regulations.
Yes. I really doubt the constitutionality of the “deal” our government made with big pharma saying a private citizen cannot sue them for damages. How can the government negotiate away our rights?
If it’s the government doing it, that’s well and good. I advocated the same to government employees.
If it’s your “private” corporate job doing it in proxy for the government, little different situation.
Wouldn’t arguing constitutional rights to a private business require leaning on employment statutes that are already unconstitutional? Seems like shaky ground.
Religious exemption is indeed begging for breadcrumbs, I agree, but sometimes just gotta go with what works, take the W, and work on being better prepared next time.