This whole 'experts say' thing has dogged us for long enough. Especially when they get it blatantly wrong, on many levels. Whose experts? Oh, you mean the agency who makes rules about stuff, so they can get lots of money?
Science must be able to be questioned, or it isn't science. So, the 'science is settled' is a meaningless phrase.
Further to Covid etc., I am still clandestinely waiting for a Nuremberg code hearing - much as that code was made on an International level as part of the formation of the UN, and those codes are not decided upon, by the SC.
That is: One has the fundamental right to refuse a medical 'treatment' or procedure. On the basis of not wanting it. No reason needed - so that even if the reason is religious; or because one has contra-indications; or have taken advice from second or third opinions; or did one's own research: the basic right is One's word. No means No.
And further to that: Hospitals must not take it upon themselves to punish unbelievers by a refusal to help with other procedures- that breaks all sorts of codes, including the hippocratic oath.
The play book of the Democrats is to "do as they please", and anyone who doesn't like it is free to spend time and money trying to stop them in court. They don't self regulate. They cheat.
Nice. Thanks.
This whole 'experts say' thing has dogged us for long enough. Especially when they get it blatantly wrong, on many levels. Whose experts? Oh, you mean the agency who makes rules about stuff, so they can get lots of money?
Science must be able to be questioned, or it isn't science. So, the 'science is settled' is a meaningless phrase.
Further to Covid etc., I am still clandestinely waiting for a Nuremberg code hearing - much as that code was made on an International level as part of the formation of the UN, and those codes are not decided upon, by the SC.
That is: One has the fundamental right to refuse a medical 'treatment' or procedure. On the basis of not wanting it. No reason needed - so that even if the reason is religious; or because one has contra-indications; or have taken advice from second or third opinions; or did one's own research: the basic right is One's word. No means No.
And further to that: Hospitals must not take it upon themselves to punish unbelievers by a refusal to help with other procedures- that breaks all sorts of codes, including the hippocratic oath.
I'd argue that this is the most important ruling our country has ever had.
And don't forget the EUA. They were able to decree its use because no other therapeutics were available wink wink like ivermectin, zinc, hcq.
It is NOT legal to MADATE A FUCKING EUA.
THEY ONLY GOT THE EUA because no other therapeutics were available wink wink like ivermectin, zinc, hcq.
FTFY. Tyson foods just lost $700,000 when an employee sued over the mandate.
IF the 'KEYSTONE' be shattered, what will become of the 'TEMPLE" ?
That's deep.
Which of the north? You mean Gretchen Witchmer?
The more I read about this, the more I feel that this was effectively castrating them into not being able to do anything besides ... covert actions.
WW3 here we come
Does this mean we can build small pickups and Cummins 5.9 diesel engines again?
Does this have any effect on the family court system?
Nicely put, thank you.
The Dem states may still try it and say it's the law, which is why it's time to move from the blue states.
The play book of the Democrats is to "do as they please", and anyone who doesn't like it is free to spend time and money trying to stop them in court. They don't self regulate. They cheat.