I can't find what's supposed to "hold water" or be interesting about it.
It seems entirely unremarkable. Celebrating on July 4th the signing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776 has been pretty common in the US for centuries...?
Yeah. I was referring to the linked "narrative assertions" (which I had seen and looked through before) that Alice linked:
Aka that Trump, in secret, with ten other witnesses, signed 'the New' Declaration of Independence" and established a new United States.
"who email the parchment paper pictures of the whole document to Gene Decode, and he then emailed me in late January 2021. I then transcribed the complete document into Word document so everyone could easily read it. I did post this on Operation Disclosure."
Blah, blah, Blah.
For some very strange reason, some folks interpret Melania's tweet to be a secret message meaning:
"Looking forward to celebrating the birth of our great nation (#2 United States) and the signing of the (New) Declaration of Independence (which we will be doing today) at the White House with Potus"
They appear unable to interpret the syntax of Melania's sentence structure, which, while mildly ambiguous grammatically, makes perfect sense contextually to mean:
Looking forward to celebrating the birth of our great nation (which happened 244 years ago) and the signing of the Declaration of Independence (aka what happened 244 years ago to give birth to our great nation) with Potus.
OP appears to think that the former idea might be real, and that narratives around the signing (in secret, mind you, but then released very secretly to ..... a no one with a blog .....) of a new declaration and a new united states of America created by Trump might "hold water".
The verb celebrating has two direct objects: birth and signing (not a verb here but a gerund—a present-participle verb acting as a noun, as in 'Cheating is wrong' or 'Lying is immoral'). The message is easy to understand by simply reversing the order of these objects (and/or by repeating the word celebrating):
Looking forward to celebrating the signing of the Declaration of Independence and the birth of our Nation.
Looking forward to celebrating the signing of the Declaration of Independence and celebrating the birth of our Nation.
It's also easy to understand that the announcement of the creation of a new Republic of United States of America and signing of a new Declaration of Independence (why would we need a new one of those anyway??) would not be casually made in a random social media post by the First Lady. For fuck's sake people.
I've heard about this before, but never really delved into it too much. This is YUGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thank you so much for the link to the 2nd Declaration of Independence. This is just so awesome!
"The Stranger who gave courage to doubters and sealed the destiny of the New Nation
In his Secret Destiny of America Manly P Hall refers to the appearance in America, prior to
the signing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776, of a mysterious Rosicrucian philosopher, a strict vegetarian who ate only foods that grew above the ground, who was a friend and teacher of Franklin and Washington, and who seemed to have played an important role in the founding of the new republic."
watched a few minutes last night, was very interesting! will listen to the rest tonight. learning about St. Germaine is better than any 'entertainment'😇
BETTER than a Queen. Much better than royalty. Please see "The Great Chain of Being". Having a hierarchical system that locks people into the role they are born in (knowing your place), is horrible and exactly what we fought against in 1776.
see my note below, for an alternative perspective on 'royalty'.
Royalty is NOT a higher level of human being.
Exactly. All human beings are created to be royalty, and to be equal in that status. 'Royalty' in history has been fake, based on power and control, not based on true love, which is the great equalizer.
Here's the thing. Human beings were created to be royalty. God's children were created to be kings and queens over creation. But the Archangel stole that position, made it his own, and then multiplied the model in to kings and queens and royalty in a satanic form.
Upside down. A true king serves, and is responsible. He does not control, or dominate, or exploit. Even the best kings we've seen in history are a distorted image, not fully reflecting the original and true nature of royalty.
So, with regards to Melania, I would not say "She would be our Queen", but rather, "She is a queen", not of the USA, but certainly of her family and household. And that's why we love someone like her; because she actually embodies the qualities we hope to see in all women, to be queens.
I think her tweet might go along with this. https://ge.usembassy.gov/remarks-by-president-trump-at-the-2020-salute-to-america-july-4/
This was an interesting read in regard to the signing of a new Declaration of Independence. https://operationdisclosureofficial.com/2021/09/09/the-real-2nd-declaration-of-independence-signed-by-president-trump-7-4-2020/
Well that's damned interesting!
Thanks for the links, fam
Interesting, but nonsense, imo.
(apologies for being so forthright about it!)
I can't find what's supposed to "hold water" or be interesting about it.
It seems entirely unremarkable. Celebrating on July 4th the signing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776 has been pretty common in the US for centuries...?
People are reading it as referring to a new signing, rather than the celebration of the signing.
Desperate.
Yeah. I was referring to the linked "narrative assertions" (which I had seen and looked through before) that Alice linked:
Aka that Trump, in secret, with ten other witnesses, signed 'the New' Declaration of Independence" and established a new United States.
"who email the parchment paper pictures of the whole document to Gene Decode, and he then emailed me in late January 2021. I then transcribed the complete document into Word document so everyone could easily read it. I did post this on Operation Disclosure."
Blah, blah, Blah.
For some very strange reason, some folks interpret Melania's tweet to be a secret message meaning:
"Looking forward to celebrating the birth of our great nation (#2 United States) and the signing of the (New) Declaration of Independence (which we will be doing today) at the White House with Potus"
They appear unable to interpret the syntax of Melania's sentence structure, which, while mildly ambiguous grammatically, makes perfect sense contextually to mean:
OP appears to think that the former idea might be real, and that narratives around the signing (in secret, mind you, but then released very secretly to ..... a no one with a blog .....) of a new declaration and a new united states of America created by Trump might "hold water".
Yeah, I know.
The verb celebrating has two direct objects: birth and signing (not a verb here but a gerund—a present-participle verb acting as a noun, as in 'Cheating is wrong' or 'Lying is immoral'). The message is easy to understand by simply reversing the order of these objects (and/or by repeating the word celebrating):
Looking forward to celebrating the signing of the Declaration of Independence and the birth of our Nation.
Looking forward to celebrating the signing of the Declaration of Independence and celebrating the birth of our Nation.
It's also easy to understand that the announcement of the creation of a new Republic of United States of America and signing of a new Declaration of Independence (why would we need a new one of those anyway??) would not be casually made in a random social media post by the First Lady. For fuck's sake people.
Critical thinking FTW ;p
Why wouldn't he be? Unless something significant has happened, the President usually celebrates Independence Day in DC.
I've heard about this before, but never really delved into it too much. This is YUGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thank you so much for the link to the 2nd Declaration of Independence. This is just so awesome!
because you mentioned 'signing of the Declaration of Independence'; thought this was interesting; about St. Germaine...
https://nancybragin.com/2016/06/30/the-mysterious-stranger-in-philadelphia-july-4th-1776/
"The Stranger who gave courage to doubters and sealed the destiny of the New Nation
In his Secret Destiny of America Manly P Hall refers to the appearance in America, prior to the signing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776, of a mysterious Rosicrucian philosopher, a strict vegetarian who ate only foods that grew above the ground, who was a friend and teacher of Franklin and Washington, and who seemed to have played an important role in the founding of the new republic."
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_kwWls-oBXw
watched a few minutes last night, was very interesting! will listen to the rest tonight. learning about St. Germaine is better than any 'entertainment'😇
Sorry UK. We don't have royalty, but if we did, this would be our queen.
BETTER than a Queen. Much better than royalty. Please see "The Great Chain of Being". Having a hierarchical system that locks people into the role they are born in (knowing your place), is horrible and exactly what we fought against in 1776.
Royalty is NOT a higher level of human being.
ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL. -Thomas Jefferson
see my note below, for an alternative perspective on 'royalty'.
Exactly. All human beings are created to be royalty, and to be equal in that status. 'Royalty' in history has been fake, based on power and control, not based on true love, which is the great equalizer.
I'd love to hear your opinion on "The Great Chain of Being".
Hopefully I get a chance to investigate!!!
Here's the thing. Human beings were created to be royalty. God's children were created to be kings and queens over creation. But the Archangel stole that position, made it his own, and then multiplied the model in to kings and queens and royalty in a satanic form.
Upside down. A true king serves, and is responsible. He does not control, or dominate, or exploit. Even the best kings we've seen in history are a distorted image, not fully reflecting the original and true nature of royalty.
So, with regards to Melania, I would not say "She would be our Queen", but rather, "She is a queen", not of the USA, but certainly of her family and household. And that's why we love someone like her; because she actually embodies the qualities we hope to see in all women, to be queens.
Probably start to next year's HUGE Celebration that President Trump has planned.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHvGFryPZdA
David Straight Reads The Second Declaration of Independence
Why did she put an apostrophe on Americans?
Shows ownership.
English isn't her first language. There are plenty red blooded Americans here who try to pluralize words with an apostrophe.
Weren't Trump and Melania at Mt Rushmore on July 4th 2020? Soooo...not at whitehouse.
Imagine the cages that THAT ambiguous statement rattled :)
There was a video for Flynn signing a second "Declaration of Independence". It was in a sunroom if I remember correctly.
I don't remember who else was there. Seems like they were printed on some sort of metal or something like that. I'll see if I can find it.
Found it.
https://rumble.com/v1z3aag-general-flynn-signs-the-unanimous-declaration-of-thirteen-states-of-the-uni.html