Three snipers were stationed inside building used in Trump assassination attempt
This is pure speculation. I am not making any authoritative statements. This is a random thought to generate conversation and pure speculation. Everyone should use their own mind to think of their own thoughts and take none of this as a statement of fact. It is pure speculation and not to be taken as a call for violence of any kind.
The story goes that a deranged young man who was a registered Republican but donated to democratic causes was a lone gunman on a rooftop. This rooftop was likely one of the best locations possible for an assassin to attempt to kill President Trump. It was straight in front of President Trump and within range of a regular rifle. A sniper rifle was NOT required.
Of all of the places to secure, this one building was likely the highest priority. It is impossible to think that the Secret Service or Local Law Enforcement would leave this ideal shooting location unguarded and unsecured.
Eye witness account: Exclusive on Trump Assassination: “I’ve Been to Every Trump Rally, They Left a Clear Line-of-Sight to Kill Trump” (VIDEO INTERVIEW)
It has been reported that Audio forensics suggest as many as three weapons fired at Trump rally.
It is also being reported that Three snipers were stationed inside building used in Trump assassination attempt.
If three snipers inside the building shot at President Trump, and there was a lone gunman on the roof "shooting" at President Trump, the trajectory of the bullets would be pretty close to the same. They would at least come from the same direction and the same range, albeit at a different elevation than the roof, but maybe close enough.
Dallas Alexander, a veteran sniper whose team holds the world record for the longest confirmed sniper kill, has suggested that Thomas Matthew Crooks, the 20-year-old who attempted to assassinate former President Donald Trump at a rally on Saturday night, may have had inside help.
Dallas Dan Crenshaw Rebuttle Here.
Is it possible that Crooks was simply a patsy on the roof? Was the real kill team inside?
Again. Pure speculation. For discussion purposes only. Not a call for violence in any way. Always discern and think for yourself. Be kind and don't hurt anyone.
"Is it possible that Crooks was simply a patsy on the roof? Was the real kill team inside?"
Yes the patsy was on the roof.
IDK but think it less likely that the ones in the bldg were active shooters. The water tower seems more likely . . .
Someone needs to 3D map this site.
It can be done with the right drone and equipment.
The CIA always has multiple snipers on target and a patsy that will be killed to pin the blame on
Oswald comes to mind.
Will we ever see the forensics on all the bullets? That would tell a lot
Very possible, I have been thinking the same.
I don't think so. Any additional shooters would likely be in elevated positions with access to a fast exit from the area.
When I first pulled up the area on Google Earth the thing that stood so prominently to me was the water tower was close enough for a good rifleman to connect with a shot. Why was that tower not covered by SS? Why would you accept a venue with that in it, and not cover it?
You make very good points.
I am not certain of the elevations. However, the building base may already be elevated, so both the building and the roof could be elevated above any obstructions. Also, the bleachers are behind the president so not much elevation is needed.
If the building isn't elevated, then what are the 3 police snipers doing inside the building? Eating snacks? If it isn't elevated, then they should have been on the roof. They should have been anyway.
The easiest way to take a sniper position away is to use it yourself.
Why would three police snipers need a fast exit? They are cops. They are expected to be armed and potentially use their weapons. They could have fired off shots and had zero reason to leave quickly, especially if the nearby cops were in on the scheme.
It is far easier for the actual snipers to hide inside a building rather than outside on the rooftop, or on the water tower. It would be too easy for someone to see a sniper on a water tower and take a picture or video. I don't think that is a risk an assassin or the actual perpetrators would take.
Also, I noticed the sniper on the barn roof, behind Trump, has a patch that says police on it. As opposed to the Secret Service.
Could 4 replacement officers be put into position for this? One on overwatch and three inside the building? Maybe the officers involved were "contract officers" and not regulars. I've read accounts that the regular Secret Service team was not on duty that day.
I suspect the shot came from inside the building, just below the patsy. The patsy was killed to cover up the truth and create the story.
There is no other way this type of security breach happens without purposeful dereliction of duty. Again, all just my personal opinion and speculation. I am often wrong about things.
I wasn't referencing police snipers needing a fast exit. It the cabal had more snipers than just the toady they would have been the pros that they wanted to get away fast, and a pro could have made the shot from the water tower when most joe blows could not.
What I was inferring is that the cops may have been the shooters. Or at least hired deep state goons hired as "police officers."
There are so many things wrong about everything it is hard to pin just one thing down.
That is true too. And at this point it could have been anyone. I have given the thought that one of the two on the building next to Trump may have been supposed to shoot him.
After all we are finally seeing and hearing of the assassination of JFK I think many of us are aware of just how treacherous our government is when it comes to the life of anyone in their way.
💯% fren!
Would literal real snipers actually miss though? At such an easy shot?
100 times out of 100 -- on a fixed target. Trump's quick head turn saved him. Target movement is the one factor a pro sniper cannot control.
I don't think for a second there wasn't at least one drone in the air...
How many bullet holes (maybe those were in people) were found behind DJT? Where were they? What was the angle created between DJT and those holes?
The bleachers would’ve been an obstruction from a lower site line inside the building. HOWEVER, I’m begging to believe Crooks was the sacrificial lamb & his back story, or lack thereof, provides perfect obfuscation. Feds have nothing BS. If you look at aerial photos of that business there are other roof lines behind Crooks position. If you further look (map app) you’ll some are different heights, with AGR’s main building being the tallest. So, was the awkward kid, spotted many times beforehand, and even with a rangefinder, the perfect and abundantly ignorant / blind patsy who would naturally divert attention to himself? Did he got about getting himself into position to carryout the mission from his groomers, only to have his head blown open?
I’d like to know where Cory C. 🇺🇸 was seated in relation to Trump. The trajectory would be very informative. Accuracy/ precision. Maybe the kid fired aimlessly, while a sniper (different position) glanced Trump. Kid is spotted by counter sniper & ends-up dead, story unfolds, sniper gets clean get away.
☝🏻iMO seems more DS op than relying on some amateur neckbeard.
https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message5759432/pg1
Personally I doubt it. It looked like the shooter had a small scope, or maybe just iron sights…and a 150 yrd shot is EASY with training for either. Any real shooter could be made that shot easy. Even in the Marines, they are taught basic shooting skills at 500 yards, usually iron sights. So I’m gonna say this guy was “allowed” to shoot at his hearts content. Still missed. But that’s imo.