How can we EVER trust someone who has been the director of the CIA?! I can’t and won’t. Get texts from Pompeo all the time quoting the Bible and talking about his Christianity, just cannot buy it. The hypocrisy is just too much.
He's a neocon. I have a family member that worked for him. He was all business. No personality, wouldn't joke or like anyone joking around. He's a turd.
This is just my opinion, but, Pompeo didn't pressure Trump not to release the JFK files, he pressured Trump to time the release more appropriately. The JFK files ultimately implicate Israel , and, pre-2020, It was not the appropriate time . ISRAEL FOR LAST
He put all the governors on notice about Chinese involvement so I'm still waiting on that timing also. Cooper was in the favorable column of the Chinese.. Ready for that shoe to drop !
I hate to be that guy, but has Tucker been write about any of these things? He throws out these bombshells and then it just quietly goes away because it never emerges or wasn't true. He does it every other month and has since he got fired from Fox.
It's not "mindbending", it's just seeing say, a bunch of Mafiosi at an Italian restaurant, having fun. It's their world, and as George Carlin would say, "you ain't in it."
The cia is a crime syndicate that's allowed to do criminal things under the premise that no illegal act that benefits the country is an illegal act at all. Who any of the shit in the last 30 years ever benefited, im sure i can't guess; because it's seemingly no one.
There was a very compelling post or x thread or Yt video posted here not long ago that helped convince me these allegations that Tucker is making were just part of Sun Tzu deception and that Pompeo has a white hat under his gray hat. Wish I had time to dig it up for you.
I really don't mean any disrespect to fellow frogs, but frankly I find it depressing to observe just how many of our number adhere to the normie level narratives and just buy in to "X is a snake", "Y is a traitor" etc, without even thinking. Do people even read Q?
Let's see. Who appointed Pompeo to the CIA. Donald Trump. Who appointed Pompeo to be Sec. of State? Donald Trump. Who worked with Pompeo during 70% of his administration to accomplish unprecedented foreign affairs victories like the North Korea summit, the Abraham Accords, and others? Donald Trump.
It's completely contradictory thinking to think on the one hand DJT is Geotus, playing 5D chess and on the other, think that he appoints snakes to critical position in his cabinet for extended periods of time.
One or the other, not both.
Anyway, suffice it to say I find this sort of thread (the level of thought that is or is not displayed) extremely depressing, but I'm glad you linked me in, anyway.
Firstly, we covered this quite a few weeks back. It's NOT new information.
Secondly, the interview took place 3 months ago. It's old information being rehashed for clicks.
I appreciate your efforts here, but in my opinion you post far too many x posts that are not vetted, not examined or researched, from multiple dodgy accounts on X like Joe Rambo. These people do NOT research. They do NOT investigate and dig and verify or do anything with the information they put out there.
It's always dodgy stuff that certainly generates lots of clicks from anons or awakened folks who themselves do NOT research but instead just forward stuff because it aligns with their bias or they have a rush on endorphins because, you know, "shared information!"
But the quality if the information seems to never be considered.
This is the original tweet. The account op linked to posted it afresh, perhaps leading to the confusion here.
You know, after recalling this from when it first dropped, and in hindsight now, I wouldn't be surprised if this unsure stance on Pompeo is beneficial to the plan. I could say the same for Bill Barr, and maybe Flynn also. The only other options would be that Tucker Carlson is a renegade gray hat, or a black hat, seeding disinfo into our movement, but Trump really seems to like the guy so I can't be too sure...
I wouldn't be surprised if this unsure stance on Pompeo is beneficial to the plan.
I think that is a possibility. It provides some narrative cover for him. In the case of Barr, certainly, (Barr's activities in media since 2021 indicate that, imo), Flynn, well, yes, Mike Flynn has been sowing the confusion himself, quite deliberately.
But in the case of Pompeo, I'm not so sure. The normie view anyway is that he is pro-Trump, with a good possibility of being in a 2nd administration. So who or what does he need narrative cover for? Hmmmm....
It might possibly be a narrative designed to implicate the CIA and highlight it, to keep it in the news, but..... the entire Kill Assange story found it's entry point with some very DS lefty mainstream propaganda artists (aka 'journalists'). Was it fed to them? Possibly. But I cannot see a "why" here, aka what is the benefit?
Either way, anons should not simply be reacting emotionally, and should look deeper, instead of responding like a bunch of normies with their heads cut off. (IMO).
The more I think about it, the less likely it seems that Tucker would simply suckup a story planted by Marxist globalist critters like the reporters that made the story, so...
I don't think Tucker is either gray or black. Most certainly not. But, he is also not infallible. My initial conclusion was that for some reason, he slipped up. Now I think that's pretty unlikely.
So perhaps a deliberate deployment is the most logical reason. The "Pompeo is evil" argument makes as much sense as "Assange is a triple-agent Globalist spy" one.
the entire Kill Assange story found it's entry point with some very DS lefty mainstream propaganda artists (aka 'journalists'). Was it fed to them? Possibly. But I cannot see a "why" here, aka what is the benefit?
Maybe it's good for optics for the CIA to take an anti Assange stance, but to avoid tarnishing Pompeo's reputation fully, they let some lefty rag be the ones to report it, which gives plenty of room for doubt while still putting the narrative out there enough to be in conversations. Hell if I know, this 5D info war stuff can get pretty insane, I'm trying not to go insane thinking through it 😂
Either way, anons should not simply be reacting emotionally, and should look deeper, instead of responding like a bunch of normies with their heads cut off. (IMO).
Yep. It took me a few years to mature past the reactive "OMG LOOK OMG" stage. Clickbait has gotten pretty sophisticated and I still get caught by some of it but have learned to not POST it as quickly as before. Just gotta work with anons and help them get to that point.
Didn't you make a post a while back about how to recognize clickbait / how to logically determine if a story is solid? I'll start dropping that in peoples comments section if you can link me to it. Or maybe you can re post / update it?
Hell if I know, this 5D info war stuff can get pretty insane, I'm trying not to go insane thinking through it
Kek. Yup.
Good ideas, plenty of room for thought work and thought experiments.
Or maybe you can re post / update it?
I'll take a look at revisiting it. It could probably do with some editing and refining (if not a slimming down - I wonder how much of my stuff is accessible to the whole board. I do tend to write lengthy expositions, not everyone's cup of tea.....)
I think he went on a serious diet a few years ago and lost a ton of weight, trying to look better so he could run for POTUS. Honestly he did a really good job at that, but it was never gonna help him win the presidency. Check back again in 5 or so years and he will probably revert.
Those who push simply have no grasp of reality.
Those who push simply do not understand warfare tactics.
Emotions cloud judgement.
Emotions cloud logic.
and
Research for yourself.
Be in control of yourself.
NEVER let someone else DRIVE YOU.
Not to mention:
Q4844
Wasn't referring to Kansas' statement re: Clinton emails.
In which Q clearly indicates that he is talking about Pompeo as "Kansas"
Q
Also: Q2979 Anon queries, "Is this supposed to be Potus hand?"
You may dislike Pompeo, but the evidence is pretty conclusive that Q referred to Pompeo as "Kansas", something all anons 2017-2020 took as undisputed.
Maybe it's time to reconsider your biases, and ask Why DJT used Pompeo so much in pivotal core roles during his presidency. ALL through his presidency.
Pompeo is fucking garbage. He was also one of the ones behind selling US Steel to the Japanese.
You can take the scumbag out of the CIA, but you can’t take the CIA out of the scumbag.
How can we EVER trust someone who has been the director of the CIA?! I can’t and won’t. Get texts from Pompeo all the time quoting the Bible and talking about his Christianity, just cannot buy it. The hypocrisy is just too much.
We can't - they don't get to be CIA director unless they've sold out.
But, they have no integrity, so if their backs are up against the wall, don't expect any loyalty.
He's a neocon. I have a family member that worked for him. He was all business. No personality, wouldn't joke or like anyone joking around. He's a turd.
This is just my opinion, but, Pompeo didn't pressure Trump not to release the JFK files, he pressured Trump to time the release more appropriately. The JFK files ultimately implicate Israel , and, pre-2020, It was not the appropriate time . ISRAEL FOR LAST
Waiting for the movie to end so we can see which characters are playing double roles cats..
He put all the governors on notice about Chinese involvement so I'm still waiting on that timing also. Cooper was in the favorable column of the Chinese.. Ready for that shoe to drop !
This is the correct take. Thank You catsfive!
I hate to be that guy, but has Tucker been write about any of these things? He throws out these bombshells and then it just quietly goes away because it never emerges or wasn't true. He does it every other month and has since he got fired from Fox.
Is there something I'm missing about this guy?
I call BS on the whole thing, Trump appointed Pompeo and Q called Pompeo Kansas and always said "Trust Kansas."
I agree with you. If Q says to trust Pompeo, so do I.
Trust Kansas! (The band)
https://youtu.be/KHbkrHwy7I0?si=jDT8PXcV91T9OSYy Song for America ~ Kansas
😸
It's not "mindbending", it's just seeing say, a bunch of Mafiosi at an Italian restaurant, having fun. It's their world, and as George Carlin would say, "you ain't in it."
The cia is a crime syndicate that's allowed to do criminal things under the premise that no illegal act that benefits the country is an illegal act at all. Who any of the shit in the last 30 years ever benefited, im sure i can't guess; because it's seemingly no one.
There was a very compelling post or x thread or Yt video posted here not long ago that helped convince me these allegations that Tucker is making were just part of Sun Tzu deception and that Pompeo has a white hat under his gray hat. Wish I had time to dig it up for you.
I wish you did, too Lawjic, but maybe you'll come across it and then make a post about it.
Sometimes wishes really do come true.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17tLFhJg2S/pompeo-assange-and-the-evil-pomp/
I remember this great post by u/FractalizingIron
Thanks Lawjic... you're good! 👏
Thanks for linking me, Joy!
I really don't mean any disrespect to fellow frogs, but frankly I find it depressing to observe just how many of our number adhere to the normie level narratives and just buy in to "X is a snake", "Y is a traitor" etc, without even thinking. Do people even read Q?
Let's see. Who appointed Pompeo to the CIA. Donald Trump. Who appointed Pompeo to be Sec. of State? Donald Trump. Who worked with Pompeo during 70% of his administration to accomplish unprecedented foreign affairs victories like the North Korea summit, the Abraham Accords, and others? Donald Trump.
It's completely contradictory thinking to think on the one hand DJT is Geotus, playing 5D chess and on the other, think that he appoints snakes to critical position in his cabinet for extended periods of time.
One or the other, not both.
Anyway, suffice it to say I find this sort of thread (the level of thought that is or is not displayed) extremely depressing, but I'm glad you linked me in, anyway.
He's very smart, self-righteous. Also very devious. I get the feeling he wouldn't have a problem stabbing someone in the back, Trump especially.
https://twstalker.com/ThrillaRilla369/status/1817185051378909370
Joy, why did you even post this?
Firstly, we covered this quite a few weeks back. It's NOT new information.
Secondly, the interview took place 3 months ago. It's old information being rehashed for clicks.
I appreciate your efforts here, but in my opinion you post far too many x posts that are not vetted, not examined or researched, from multiple dodgy accounts on X like Joe Rambo. These people do NOT research. They do NOT investigate and dig and verify or do anything with the information they put out there.
It's always dodgy stuff that certainly generates lots of clicks from anons or awakened folks who themselves do NOT research but instead just forward stuff because it aligns with their bias or they have a rush on endorphins because, you know, "shared information!"
But the quality if the information seems to never be considered.
Please reconsider your approach.
Sign, frog.
https://x.com/Red_Pill_US/status/1782216490349220301
This is the original tweet. The account op linked to posted it afresh, perhaps leading to the confusion here.
You know, after recalling this from when it first dropped, and in hindsight now, I wouldn't be surprised if this unsure stance on Pompeo is beneficial to the plan. I could say the same for Bill Barr, and maybe Flynn also. The only other options would be that Tucker Carlson is a renegade gray hat, or a black hat, seeding disinfo into our movement, but Trump really seems to like the guy so I can't be too sure...
I think that is a possibility. It provides some narrative cover for him. In the case of Barr, certainly, (Barr's activities in media since 2021 indicate that, imo), Flynn, well, yes, Mike Flynn has been sowing the confusion himself, quite deliberately.
But in the case of Pompeo, I'm not so sure. The normie view anyway is that he is pro-Trump, with a good possibility of being in a 2nd administration. So who or what does he need narrative cover for? Hmmmm....
It might possibly be a narrative designed to implicate the CIA and highlight it, to keep it in the news, but..... the entire Kill Assange story found it's entry point with some very DS lefty mainstream propaganda artists (aka 'journalists'). Was it fed to them? Possibly. But I cannot see a "why" here, aka what is the benefit?
Either way, anons should not simply be reacting emotionally, and should look deeper, instead of responding like a bunch of normies with their heads cut off. (IMO).
The more I think about it, the less likely it seems that Tucker would simply suckup a story planted by Marxist globalist critters like the reporters that made the story, so...
I don't think Tucker is either gray or black. Most certainly not. But, he is also not infallible. My initial conclusion was that for some reason, he slipped up. Now I think that's pretty unlikely.
So perhaps a deliberate deployment is the most logical reason. The "Pompeo is evil" argument makes as much sense as "Assange is a triple-agent Globalist spy" one.
(makes no sense)
thx for the res
Maybe it's good for optics for the CIA to take an anti Assange stance, but to avoid tarnishing Pompeo's reputation fully, they let some lefty rag be the ones to report it, which gives plenty of room for doubt while still putting the narrative out there enough to be in conversations. Hell if I know, this 5D info war stuff can get pretty insane, I'm trying not to go insane thinking through it 😂
Yep. It took me a few years to mature past the reactive "OMG LOOK OMG" stage. Clickbait has gotten pretty sophisticated and I still get caught by some of it but have learned to not POST it as quickly as before. Just gotta work with anons and help them get to that point.
Didn't you make a post a while back about how to recognize clickbait / how to logically determine if a story is solid? I'll start dropping that in peoples comments section if you can link me to it. Or maybe you can re post / update it?
Tanks, winn.
Kek. Yup.
Good ideas, plenty of room for thought work and thought experiments.
I'll take a look at revisiting it. It could probably do with some editing and refining (if not a slimming down - I wonder how much of my stuff is accessible to the whole board. I do tend to write lengthy expositions, not everyone's cup of tea.....)
remember when people here where like "Trust Kansas!" LOL
lol, yeah, like ....... Q
So you trust Tucker, former CIA wanna be, we know, because .... he's tucker. (I personally like tucker a lot) but you do not trust Q.
Hmmmm.... .
A lot of people belong in Guantanamo. I'm hoping we finally get some justice.
Any recent pictures of Pompeo don’t look like him
I think he went on a serious diet a few years ago and lost a ton of weight, trying to look better so he could run for POTUS. Honestly he did a really good job at that, but it was never gonna help him win the presidency. Check back again in 5 or so years and he will probably revert.
Maybe he has gastric bypass..
This was from two weeks ago right?
I never trusted that weasel.
"T t t ttrust K k kkansas guys" - Yeah, I've never liked that POS. That has to mean something else.
Disinformation is necessary...
Many people forget Q said that.
Q said trust kansas, not trust Pompeo.
Q also said:
and
Not to mention:
Q4844
In which Q clearly indicates that he is talking about Pompeo as "Kansas" Q
Also: Q2979 Anon queries, "Is this supposed to be Potus hand?"
u/#q2979
https://qanon.pub/data/media/cc94ef60454c68426388c21c20d05f3a4af16f7e065fcb160a5329a4ea7e6077.png
and Q replies:
Now, look at Mike pompeo's hands
https://www.examiner.com.au/images/transform/v1/crop/frm/silverstone-feed-data/71e7e949-cf98-4435-994e-843f97c546bd.jpg/r0_0_800_600_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/1d2fd7a/2147483647/strip/true/crop/6000x4000+0+0/resize/630x420!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2F31%2F2c%2Ff459afaa48bfb009165ddcffecf0%2Fus-iran-99548.jpg
Compare DJT's hands:
https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2017/02/02/10/trumpthumbs1.jpg
https://www.minnpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/PompeoTrump640.jpg
You may dislike Pompeo, but the evidence is pretty conclusive that Q referred to Pompeo as "Kansas", something all anons 2017-2020 took as undisputed.
Maybe it's time to reconsider your biases, and ask Why DJT used Pompeo so much in pivotal core roles during his presidency. ALL through his presidency.
Just saying...
u/Joys1Daughter/
u/Olddogg/