I've been thinking about this since the assassination attempt and I was halfway going to wait to see how my theory played out, but I decided to put it out there in case it plays out and we can know what we are seeing. Q has said couple times “It’s going to be biblical”. u/#q3565 u/#q3624 And we can all see the obvious interpretation of a battle of good versus evil but I always read more into it that there's something very specific that's going to be biblical and we were literally going to be able to see today's events tied to biblical events. Now, I certainly don't claim to know God's plan or have divine insight. This was something that occurred to me when trump got shot in the ear and had the blood on the tip of his ear. In Exodus, there are verses where God is telling Moses to consecrate Aaron and his sons as priests:
Exodus 29:1,20 - “And this is the thing that thou shalt do unto them to hallow them, to minister unto me in the priest’s office: Take one young bullock, and two rams without blemish… Then shalt thou kill the ram, and take of his blood, and put it upon the tip of the right ear of Aaron, and upon the tip of the right ear of his sons, and upon the thumb of their right hand, and upon the great toe of their right foot and sprinkle the blood upon the altar round about.” KJV (bullock=bull)
And when trump got shot he had blood on the tip of his right ear, just like the way Moses consecrated Aaron. Now we hear there may be another assassination attempt that will be tried. If there is one, I'm halfway thinking we see a bullet or knife or whatever graze his thumb or do something that puts blood on his thumb and maybe on his right toe the second time, or maybe during a third attempt. It would show us that God is consecrating President Trump to do his work as he officially goes forward to root out evil, corruption, pedophiles and the Satanists from this country and the world. So my theory is that this is the first step in God consecrating him. And IF this plays out that would definitely be Biblical, and show everyone (both non-Christians, and Christians that think Trump is Hitler) that God has chosen Trump to battle against the evil of this world.
Good observations. Consider that his right hand reached up and got blood on his thumb. Also remember his shoe came off, did he get blood on his foot? Was it the correct foot? Now what represents the altar?
OMG! You are wise! I believe you are correct! Zoom in on this photo, and you can definitely see a pink tinge on his right thumb. Not sure about the shoe part or the alter part though.
https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/YddmuM0sE_MTObKPKV4k8w--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTk2MDtoPTY0MA--/https://media.zenfs.com/en/ap.org/977a6da3b23a58dea1f533c6c2f9e1d2
I'm not always that wise, just observant, and just a man.
That is exactly what I thought. There was an excessive emphasis on the shoes such that it was not random.
Trump was cleansed.
I don't know where to find it, but I remember seeing a picture of his shoe on the stage after he left. If we find that picture, it would tell us which foot.
Edit: Found it. Apparently both his slip-on shoes came off, but only one was left on the stage. Can't quite figure out which foot it goes on.
I’m pretty sure that is the right shoe. The side closest to us is cut lower down to account for the bone on the outside of each foot. That cut would indicate the right shoe.
Do you have a source that shows blood on his right hand? All the footage I've seen shows a clean hand.
https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/YddmuM0sE_MTObKPKV4k8w--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTk2MDtoPTY0MA--/https://media.zenfs.com/en/ap.org/977a6da3b23a58dea1f533c6c2f9e1ita faint, but can see some transfer on his hand
Link doesn't work but saw what you may have been referring to in comments you left elsewhere. I am mostly talking about the moment he touches his ear before going to the ground. He touches his ear, looks at his hand and then ducks down. I cannot find anything that shows blood for that moment.
Can't say I do
Not negating what you are saying, I also saw the biblical thing as more significant than we knew. When Q would post, 'bigger than you can imagine', I also wondered what was more than I could imagine? Well there is only one thing I didn't think of and I now believe it's the timeline. I think we are beyond the return of Jesus living in Revelation 20:7 where Satan has been released for a little season to deceive the nations (doesn't that sum up our times?) If you have looked at the Tartaria rabbit hole at all, once you start to re-frame that as the 1000 year reign of Christ with the resurrected Saints, a lot of things make a lot more sense. If anyone knows this, it will be leaders like Trump, Putin, Bin Salman etc. as well as top BHs who have enacted a massive cover up of our true history. Think of it, everything comes together in the fact that Jesus is actually still the crowned, enthroned ruler of the world. We just didn't realize it. :-D
A lot of people have been wondering if this was Revelation time. I don’t think so. I think it’s one of God’s major corrections to the world. God has done major corrections several times whenever we stray too far off course.
Yes, I also hear a lot of Christians who believe we are about to enter into tribulation end times. I would say that those numbers have increased a lot since covid. I think they are wrong though, we are far beyond that.
can I ask you a question, and I'm not trying to be facetious,
is there any scriptural evidence that the 'return of Christ' is actually the physical return of Jesus in the flesh?
Your comment doesn't sound facetious :-) I welcome the discussion. I think maybe you are referring to preterism? People who call themselves preterists believe that most of Revelation has already been fulfilled but they see Jesus' return as spiritual rather than actual. Orthodox Christianity tends to see full preterists as heretical, although many pastors are partial preterists who believe that some of Revelation was fullfilled around AD70 when the temple in Jerusalem was destroyed. Personally I see preterists as those who have thought through scripture more deeply and in ways most futurists (most people who believe Jesus has yet to return) just look the other way. There are many tricky passages where Jesus and the Apostles made significant claims about Jesus' imminent return in their lifetimes. Some of the scriptures are very specific eg. Nathanial was told he would see Jesus' return and a conversation about John also being alive then. Few realize that C.S. Lewis called these passages 'embarrassing' as it showed him that Jesus wasn't infallible. The preterists can't ignore these passges but where they go wrong is to negate the physical return imo. So yes I think there is plenty of evidence to back up a physical 2nd coming. If you believe that Jesus didn't lie or mislead and that he was infallible then you really should look at this idea that he has already returned.
how do I put this,
I think that trying to align it to a linear timeline is akin to 'datefagging' within those that follow 'Q', in a sense
I've heard various doctrines within different Christian denominations, thank you for elaborating a little, I hadn't seen those terms used before.
If you'll allow me to get really heretical, and I apologise in advance for this, I am seeing a perspective where no contradiction exists between these views.
At this point differing wildly from any tradition I've heard about, suppose we separate the concept of Jesus, the man, from 'Christ' as a principal. I am not suggesting that they are separate or that Jesus is not Christ.
From what I understand of the concepts you just introduced to me, this may be akin to 'preterism' so yes, like that, but also, something that hasn't yet happened and will return. Both having returned and returning.
I'm going to go 'right out-there' now, and I do so in good faith with the hope you might see my point and not take offense, as I don't know your personal religious beliefs. I don't know how familiar you are with other traditions and language frameworks, so I'll just 'take a chance' so to speak
suppose this 'Christ/messiah/saviour principle' is equivalent to 'buddha nature' within Buddhism. And I mean, directly equivalent. That the two 'languages' are fundamentally connected, describing the same thing.
this forms a sort of 'bridge' providing a way for the seemingly different languages to 'talk' to each other
this opens a whole new way of integrating other concepts that you may be familiar with, 'awakening' being the key one I am getting at
From this perspective, I don't believe it is heretical to say that the man Jesus, 'of the father' 'God' or ultimate reality 'Dharmakāya', himself 'awakened' a 'buddha', 'Christ' or possessing the 'buddha-nature', vowing, compelled through God's infinite love and mercy, or 'infinite radiating compassion', showed his followers 'the way' and ultimately sacrificed his life so that he may end the suffering of all sentient beings - that they may be 'saved' and have ever lasting life.
The part that WOULD be heretical, to a Christian, is to say that I don't believe Jesus was the only being that has awakened. I would propose an infinite procession of awakened beings, all taking this vow, radiating God's love and compassion throughout the infinite cosmos.
Ah but still, in this sense, only one 'Christ' principle or buddha nature
the potential of which to realise within every sentient being.
My ultimate point being, awakening itself.
Having come, coming and yet to come.
And if this were the case, given the potential within all beings to awaken, both as destination and process, 'nothing can stop what is coming.'
You are obviously a very considered person thinking these things through carefully. My response would be that yes in one sense the ultimate end of the goal of the world is a Great Awakening when everyone is faced with the truth that they have either sought or have turned away from, or ignored (enforced awakening).... But that is not my starting point. There is light and dark, without dark we do not comprehend what light is. All the opposites we know show us the comparison that makes us understand each side. (((An aside - I recall learnig that psychology tells us that children categorize early on and many pyschs feel that they need to learn how to limit their use of category choices and to see things more individually as that is more intelligent. I believe it is how children are made, to categorize, to make sense of the world and the idea that they should not be encouraged in this is one more lil form of subversion of the left. Mainstream psychology has also claimed that less educated people categorize more, in a similar way to their claim that the more enlightened among us are progressive. SMH))) My starting point in regard to spirituality is that we have evil and we have good (opposites). If you don't believe that, then you will not agree with my assertions. In the GA though I have seen many more non-Christians say that they now believe in evil (as a separate entity, even a devil figure) because of the covid/cabal they have now witnessed). If the world is designed by a Creator who is good (or at least benign), then it is logical to believe that He would try to communicate with us and reach out in ways we would understand and also teach us about the nature of evil and good. We have our experience, our language, our social desires, our industry etc. which our creator put in us intrinsically before sin crept into the world. Well I believe He did reach out in a way we could understand with our senses and intuitions and observations and that Jesus was God's son come down to save us. I think it all holds together (the Old Testament and the New Testament) and just like Q/45, nothing ever happens that unravels the narrative for me. The bible tells it all as it is and it is the ultimate solution for the world, for humanity. Futurism (a future second coming of Jesus) has actually unraveled the very idea of Jesus as Lord for many who don't want to wait 2000+ years of this stinky DS world for Him to come back to rule when he said He would be back much sooner. As I mentioned above, it was tricky for CS Lewis to consider, let alone someone who has little experience of theology or academic culture (I know many are now not convinced by CS Lewis' goodness, but I haven't dug on that one, so I take Lewis at face value). With regards to Buddism and other spiritual paths to awakening or God? Well Jesus told us that He was the only path to the Father (John 14:6). Frankly I know I am not good enough to ascend in my own power even on a good day. The power to ascend has to be powerful enough for the worst of us to be able to get there, not just those who are enlightened enough, educated enough, well enough or strong and disciplined enough. Jesus gave us the ability to receive His Spirit within us to do the job of purifying, teaching, guiding. Christianity is the only faith that says - You can't do this, so I, God will do it for you. Just rely on me, surrender to me and I will make your paths straight, I will bless you and be your loving God. Every other religion says we have to do this, that or the other in our own strength. What happens when that strength fails? Jesus says He will give us living waters to quench our thirst and soothe our troubled minds and bodies (John 7:37-39). The invitation to go to Him is clear, unequivocal and sublime. I am grateful that I belong to Him and I pray for many, many more anon and patriots, who are yearning for the truth of humanity to understand the invitation and to belong to Jesus too. We remain indebted to 45/Q for their incredible heavy lifting, we owe it to them to embrace Jesus and achieve as much as we can towards the ultimate goal of the Great Awakening.
okay, I'll try, there is a lot to unpack. You have a greater understanding of Christianity than I do, my understanding is only through what has so far 'touched' me in a way that I have been able to feel and perceive.
I agree infact. Though there are non-dualistic interpretations and explanations for the problem of evil and I have attempted to cling to them as refuge at times, indeed it is real.
I would say that this problem of evil is equivalent to the concept of 'suffering' in Buddhism, directly equivalent. The 4 noble truths go into detail regarding the origin and logical conclusion it presents. Buddhism is really great at that specifically.
(I'm going to do this a lot, so bare with me because this is the unique perspective I think I might have as opposed to saying what others have already said about it all. If what I say is rubbish or said better by others than so be it, I have nothing to contribute in that case then lol.)
So yes, suffering exists, evil exists. There does infact appear to be a 'cabal' that has great power in this world, worshipping or otherwise drawing power or favour from some great being of evil. And when I say 'appear' I don't mean as in an illusory sense, I mean very literally. So we are in agreeance. You seem to follow the logic regarding this so I won't go on too much about this
I agree. I think the notion of 'creator' is somewhat brought about by our inability to understand a timeless, boundless god. But for the sake of conversation I do agree
So indeed, if there is evil and suffering, and there did not exist a way for this suffering and evil to be overcome, God indeed would be a malevolent figure. But this is not the case, as can be felt better rather than explained. Unfortunately some do perceive it as malevolent in their own suffering and ignorance currently.
God would indeed attempt to communicate with us and wish us to feel his infinite love and wisdom, if he couldn't do that, he wouldn't be worthy of being called God
this is precisely where I arrived at before I could rectify the contradictions I held previously. I'll attempt to demonstrate, but it will be shitty and imperfect
I too, realised that I am not good enough. I cannot bear the burden. I am an incredibly flawed, shitty human being that cannot even function on the level of most people, drowning in existential angst, bitterness, hatred towards the cabal and the 'left', wishing violence upon my enemies, not living in a way that is a good example to others. I had become unhealthy, bitter and stagnant. I did not possess the strength to go on, I felt I was about to die, literally, either heart attack or stroke. And yet, from previous experience, I believed I had attained a level of 'awakening'. So how could it be, for this contradiction to exist, eating me up inside, terrified, desperate. I prayed in earnest to god, in my heart, seeking if there was a saviour because it was surely the only way. Exactly as you say.
My heart has been opened. At once I felt the mercy and compassion of awakened beings fill my heart and radiate from me. I had accepted the possibility and then realised the reality of a saviour, to bear this burden, to lean into their boundless mercy and wisdom. I can't really explain it but it was the first time I had accepted this and it annihilates the contradictory, nihilistic 'Buddhist' view that I previously had, that we alone have the power to ascend or awaken.
But this is the point - That TOO was wrong! My previous misconceptions about Buddhism were causing this existential terror. You could say my refusal to accept Christ as saviour was preventing me from experiencing the love and mercy of God. This is what you mean, this is what you are feeling when you're sceptical of what I'm trying to communicate, but I am not meaning what you probably think I am meaning, and so I'm trying to rectify that. I hope even a little bit of this makes sense, lol. It's very hard to describe.
okay, so, this concept, Jesus Christ as saviour, is THE exact same as the Bodhisattva principal, or 'buddha-nature' principal. These are just other words to mean the same thing.
I have no proof of this, but honestly I tell you, I had never heard of this concept before. It then came across a certain Buddhist tradition of 'Pure Land' Buddhism. Essentially the followers believe the Buddha Amitābha vowed to create a 'Pure Land' or 'heaven' where any beings who call upon his name are born into after death, and from there can experience the pure compassion, wisdom and mercy of the Buddha until they are ready for 'final' awakening.
My point isn't to say that this is literally true or not. My point is that the concept of a personal saviour that sacrifices himself and vows to end the suffering of all beings that have faith in him does exist within Buddhism.
Let's consider Jesus and see whether this fits in any meaningful manner. I'll attempt to equate the words and concepts to point out what I mean
Jesus claims he is of the father or sent by God - 'ultimate reality', Truth itself, etc, that he is way the truth and the life - the embodiment of 'Dharma' Filled with the holy spirit - 'buddha-nature' That his Father's kingdom is within the hearts of all men. - there are words for this, it's escaping me right now.
That he has come to show through faith and deed the way, to die in an act of self-sacrifice for the sake of abolishing the sins of humanity - vowing to end suffering and abolish ignorance.
So far I am in complete agreement with these fundamental principles of Christianity.
but now the big one, the big distinction where all of this comparison appears to fall apart.
That is salvation is achieved through him alone, 'No one comes to the Father except through me.
IF this can be understood as nobody achieves salvation but through CHRIST alone, then yes I agree. 'Christ' being the bodhisattva principle or 'buddha-nature'
This would appear as though I am denying Jesus as Christ. I am not
This is how I see it.
Jesus, the man, 'awakened', 'attaining' the the title and embodying the principle of 'Christ'. There is more than one awakened being, but ONLY ONE Christ principle Jesus was an embodiment of this principle - 'God in the flesh' in a sense, yes. But he is not the only being with the capability for this embodiment, and I believe infact he said as much and intended it to be understood as such.
It is like the concept of the Trinity within some Christian sects. It appears to be a contradiction but is not.
That is what I truly feel in my heart, to the best of my ability that I am able to comprehend and express.
Truly I feel if you can understand this, even if but glimpse a fraction of it, the teaching becomes infinitely more beautiful, more compassionate, loving, merciful, wise etc.
It means the possibility of salvation or 'awakening' for all beings, not just those that have heard the teachings of the man Jesus that walked this earth.
I'm reading this through very carefully friend, I'll respond as soon as I am able. Much to discuss perhaps.
to put it another way, the principle of 'Christ' has always existed, it has always been one with the father. This is the meaning of 'buddha nature' It has never been that a being would need to awaken though their own ability relying only upon themselves -Christ was always there.
for some reason my posts are being deleted...
When Trump reached up with his right hand to his ear he very likely got blood on his right thumb...and what if, when his shoes came off, he nicked his right big toe on something or just dripped blood on it!
If so, that would actually be spine tingling
That literally gave me chills
Keep going
Post 3565 begins with the link https://x.com/Pontifex/status/1156165039545606144 -- in which Pope Francis posts:
(Godfather III "also includes fictionalized accounts of two real-life events: the 1978 death of Pope John Paul I and the Papal banking scandal of 1981–1982, both linked to Michael Corleone's business affairs." (from the Wikipedia link above).
Post 3565's next line is
-- in which a LOT of criminals and traitors to the Corleone family meet their end.
The third line of Post 3565 is:
I'm not going to knock your theory friend, because maybe it will be so?
I can tell you one thing that I do know with certainty,
The thing that is 'biblical' is the great awakening.
Just as datefagging fails every time, so too does attempting to put a timeline on scripture.
I suspect that is not linear, as Q deltas are not linear.
'Future proves past'
Only once we live through it and experience 'revelation' can we understand it and see the alignment.
You are on the right track, but do not look for signs or make predictions of signs to come
'we are not prophets'
focus on the mission.
:)
Well to be fair, trying to think through this like a bad guy...
If I was the bad side, I too would be aware of this and I would in-turn want to be that returned Jesus. So if there was any grand way for me to hoax it... I definitely would.
...just saying.
Q frequently uses movie references and this is one of them.
Law abiding citizen (It's Gonna Be Biblical)
Coincidentally Carl von Clausewitz is a pretty interesting dig.
Also there's the reference to Samson knocking down the pillars in the temple of Dagon.
You’re assuming that most people read the Bible.
If they were - we wouldn’t be here in the first place.
I think “biblical” will be something more obvious.
You are correct fren. To this I would say, when most people think of some future event being 'biblical', it brings to mind 'revelation' and some myth about the 'apocalypse' that they have heard somewhere along the way.
I think when you study the meaning of these words it becomes rather clear.
'The Great Awakening'
… of biblical proportions.