I read scientific papers on Ivermectin posted well before the COVID BS. Because all of those papers that were dated before COVID, sing its praises. Most of the papers during and after COVID, slate it. I know which research I believe.
Ivermectin pushed as a "fertility toxin" using reverse pyschology is equally likely as using "trusted rebel experts" to push some "trusted narrative".
Links to actual studies that proved its fertility toxic effect would be welcome, didnt find it in the substack you linked. So far, all Ivermectin studies that showed bad effects have been at crazy dosages.
Yeadon isn’t just a trusted rebel… few have spoken out against the scamdemocide or the jabs as he has. His IVM comments only came out in the last few weeks since he was handed a dossier of research papers on the topic.
Oh, I completely agree. I think some have gone the other way, or maybe they were always there - Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, Tess Laurie, Pierre Kory to name but a few… Yeadon is unique in his trajectory, IMO. He has been a real life case study in “adjusting your views as the facts on the ground change”…
He has today replied to his detractors over his IVM statements…
Hmm, we’ve been using ivermectin in our cattle for decades, both males and females. Strangely enough, the cows keep having calves. Might want to check out nations like India where ivermectin is available, don’t they have like a huge population?
On the other hand, the over abundance of estrogen in our environment and the lack of testing of ALL hormonal levels of people trying to conceive seems to be the major issue fir a decrease in our fertility levels as a population.
There were reports of ivermectin sold in vending machines in Mexico during the scamdemic…did we miss the reduced fertility and birth reduction south of the border?
Delighted for you. Truly. As I am when I see babies thriving whose mothers took the C19 injections while pregnant… Clearly there is inherent variability across formulations, dosages, individual phenotypes/biologies etc such that outcomes are not uniform.
I read scientific papers on Ivermectin posted well before the COVID BS. Because all of those papers that were dated before COVID, sing its praises. Most of the papers during and after COVID, slate it. I know which research I believe.
Full on Bull Shite
Trying the ok bait n switch narrative of the flipping
Bio weapon Shot that ACTUALLY*
DAMAGES ONES REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEMS FE/MALE
Putting it bluntly, sounds like BS to me.
Ivermectin pushed as a "fertility toxin" using reverse pyschology is equally likely as using "trusted rebel experts" to push some "trusted narrative".
Links to actual studies that proved its fertility toxic effect would be welcome, didnt find it in the substack you linked. So far, all Ivermectin studies that showed bad effects have been at crazy dosages.
Yeadon isn’t just a trusted rebel… few have spoken out against the scamdemocide or the jabs as he has. His IVM comments only came out in the last few weeks since he was handed a dossier of research papers on the topic.
We talk about tyrants who may have flipped. Why would we think this doesnt work both ways?
Oh, I completely agree. I think some have gone the other way, or maybe they were always there - Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, Tess Laurie, Pierre Kory to name but a few… Yeadon is unique in his trajectory, IMO. He has been a real life case study in “adjusting your views as the facts on the ground change”…
He has today replied to his detractors over his IVM statements…
https://open.substack.com/pub/suavek1/p/dr-mike-yeadon-reproductive-damage?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios
Then he is an idiot
Hmm, we’ve been using ivermectin in our cattle for decades, both males and females. Strangely enough, the cows keep having calves. Might want to check out nations like India where ivermectin is available, don’t they have like a huge population? On the other hand, the over abundance of estrogen in our environment and the lack of testing of ALL hormonal levels of people trying to conceive seems to be the major issue fir a decrease in our fertility levels as a population.
Yep same as my son in law. Theys sather it on with their bare hands.
The Indian State of Uttar Pradesh did not reject IVM but gave it out to its inhabitants freely, a good control group.
There were reports of ivermectin sold in vending machines in Mexico during the scamdemic…did we miss the reduced fertility and birth reduction south of the border?
Don’t think so,
Interested read. Hard to know whatto believe. IVM seems to have anti cancer benefits, but reproductive harm would be a bummer.
Tl,dw.
Can you tell us his point?
This is a decent TLDR:
https://open.substack.com/pub/conspiracysarah/p/did-you-see-dr-mike-yeadon-on-the?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios
In short, Ivermectin was given centre stage as an alternative to the jabs in order to go after the fertility of anyone who managed to avoid the jabs.
Keep in mind, one of his many specialties is mechanistic toxicology. He knows what he is talking about.
Love ivermectin and love my brand new babies. Praise the Lord Jesus 💙🙏🏻
Delighted for you. Truly. As I am when I see babies thriving whose mothers took the C19 injections while pregnant… Clearly there is inherent variability across formulations, dosages, individual phenotypes/biologies etc such that outcomes are not uniform.
We still do not know the long term impact on mothers who took the Covid shot while pregnant and shedding around their infants.
No he doesn't.
Not a factor for me.
For a deeper dive into the topics raised by Yeadon, this Conspiracy Sarah substack is worth a read:
https://open.substack.com/pub/conspiracysarah/p/did-you-see-dr-mike-yeadon-on-the?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios
Funny, I've taken lots of it and yet to have been harmed. This guy is a bold faced liar.
You might want to take a look at Google Scholar to find some science papers on the subject.
For instance:
Time stamp where he talks about it?