... which may nor may not even be true. Point is--IT'S A DISTRACTION.
What is more critical is that the metropolitan Springfield area has a population of 57,910 in 2024 (https://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/ohio/springfield).
Upon that small town has been dumped roughly 15.000 Haitians over the last three years (see Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/haitian-immigrants-fueled-springfields-growth-now-us-presidential-debate-2024-09-11/ and AP https://apnews.com/article/springfield-ohio-haitian-influx-governor-dewine-f5a552d7ebc6e246882dca96a39a3aaa).
15,000 on 57,910 is a jump of 25.9% in the city's population. That's huge! Population normally goes up or town less than 5% per year. Having it jump that much, that fast, is not absorbable.
According to the AP article, the State gave Springfield $2.5M for "... education and training for drivers, to pay for more vaccines and health screenings in schools, and to enhance translation services ...". A measly $2.5M to handle the influx.
$2,500,000 / 15,000 = $166.67 per person. That's it. Earmarked for drivers's ed, vaccines (!!!), and health screenings. Not even CLOSE to what it would cost.
And--where the heck are these people supposed to live?
It's the numbers, the sheer numbers, that matters here.
No town can absorb that many people that fast.! Even if they were all saintly choir boys eating nothing but Kraft Mac and Cheese, it would be disruptive, and that's the point. Any additional crime and cat-eating is only icing on the destructive cake that the Deep State is trying to bake.
I disagree.
It gets millions of eyes on Springfield and people also see the numbers.
Yup. Without this people wouldnt be lookinginto the company that has the refugee contracts and has brought all those Haitians into Springfield.
I 100% agree with this. Normies are more distracted by their pets getting fried up by illegal immigrants, and don't see that they're all being replaced by 3rd world illegal immigrants.... who bring their 3rd world lifestyle with them.... so the derp state can create another 3rd world country to control....
You lost me in your first sentence. IT'S TRUE.
It may well be; I wouldn't doubt it, but I don't know and it would be difficult to prove. But arguing about cats vs. no cats is a distraction from the gross overall numbers, which is far the more significant point. IMHO.
A town that small can absorb that many people if it's done properly. The town I live in, in Volusia County, FL has absorbed that many over the same time period, but it's been mostly people fleeing über Left Democrat States who have done it right by finding jobs here BEFORE leaving their previous locations.
The town is a microcosm of what is happening everywhere in the USA. It gets people questioning and asking what the heck is going on. It is not so much the sudden increase in population but, a huge culture shock because, most all the new people popping up know or care NOTHING about culture of the USA. Eating animals that we consider to be domesticated PETS, and local pond/lake birds being one of them. Hunting is not legal in parks, it just isnt, if a citizens went in and killed a bird to take it home a cook, they would be arrested on the spot and the entire town would be shaming them. Same as when they grope women on the street. Where some come from, that is allowed.. here it is NOT allowed socially or legally, it is a big NO. USA is NOT the country they came from, they better learn quick that, what they get away with in their Country of origin is NOT wanted or allowed here. If people do NOT speak up and just let them get away with it then, do we really have a Country?
I agree it's twofold: quantity and quality. I just fear that focussing on the quality is losing sight of the quantity, and brings the potential criticism of "you just raciss".
Even if all the refugees were from, say, Scotland (with a compatible culture and shared language) it would still be a problem.
You can't suddenly dump an extra 25% of the population on a small town without serious fallout.
It would still be an issue, regardless of culture of the newcomers.
This is true.
If Trump mention it is not distraction , but could be solve disclosures preparation of eating baby or human …
Good point; I'd not considered that.
https://greatawakening.win/p/1994tggYiL/some-interesting-shit-on-x-wakin/c/
Agree with op and want to point out that distractions can be useful. People are curious enough to look at the "cat" videos - it is not about them believing that critters are getting eaten - they will hear from and (hopefully) relate to the real stories of these small town people being over run with illegal migrants and the effect on everything from housing, local services, schools, health, safety, etc. and know that enough is enough.
While you're correct, it IS a distraction, it's also a marker, or a facade, for what's really going on.
People are talking about the invaders eating pets. Ultimately, they're just pets, and geese... not exactly a threat to our national security.
But this means people are talking about the invaders! And we needn't worry about the people who won't begin to ask themselves "why are there so many invaders?"
This discussion about pets being eaten will lead those who are willing to ask questions to the inevitable conclusion that you are laying out in this post.
Thank you for posting this, it's a great breakdown. It shows that the invaders are indeed a threat to national security. I'd love to hear your thoughts on what I've said.
Fair point. It could well be the entry point to normies seeing the bigger picture.
It's certainly an attention grabber!
Yea, I wish the media would share the fact that these people are being bussed in by the Dems, or that it's starting to really affect the lives of American citizens across the country. But you and I both know how WISHFUL that thinking is.
I think the best we can do with the situation is be part of the online trail of memes and information that leads reasonable lost sheep to the truth