[Update: What's amazing is that there are about 28 comments now, and not a single one of them tries answer specifically any of the five questions at the end of my post here, which was the whole purpose of the post. I'm trying to figure out how the future will play out over the next three years, not kick a hornet's nest on the "correct" interpretation of the Bible.]
[Update: Everyone please don't get hung up on Gnosticism - you can forget I even used the word Gnosticism, and I still make a lot of predictions and have a lot of questions that are worth considering and discussing.]
I've written some popular posts here (check my profile):
Updated with Wikileaks/Tucker and Putin: Israel Threatening the Nuclear Samson Option
2020 = 2024: Grab Popcorn and Buckle Up for Total Vindication Over the Next Two Weeks
Those give a sense for my general thesis:
-
We're in the Biblical End Times, hence all of the Q Bible talk
-
Trump is actually the little horn of the book of Daniel. Don't kneejerk react and say he must be evil - there are gnostic interpretations of Christianity where the little horn is not evil in a cartoonish way, but is a light bringer who helps us evolve to a new enlightenment. This is Great Awakening, not The Donald.
-
Another reason we know that we're in the End Times is that superhuman AI is right around the corner - months or years away, and this will result in killing us all, controlling us all, or making heaven on Earth. This is not conspiracy theory - the experts at the top AI companies are saying things like this.
-
Trump devolved the government and controlled Biden, either through blackmail (this sounds less insane) or just killing him and replacing him with an actor in a mask (this is what really happened, but sounds insane). This is going to be revealed, probably on Wed. Nov. 6 but my bets expire on Feb. 20, 2025 to create a little breathing room.
-
Trump-controlled-Biden to have Assange released from prison and play a role in the election. Wikileaks has been virulenty anti-Pompeo and anti-Israel all month long, bordering on the cartoonish. Trump is also saying nice things about Pompeo - so one of them is being deceptive, and it's probably Trump. Pompeo is the one "old" agency head installed into the Trump admin as part of a seven year sting operation to root out the fifth column corrupting the CIA from within - which is the state of Israel.
-
The wildest part - which even I find hard to believe - is that Trump is going to go after freemasonry too, which has roots back to the founding fathers. I think Trump will reveal that he grew up with Jewish roots and freemasonic roots (through Vincent Peale) - but he became disgusted with the child abuse and murder rituals and ultimately vowed to expose and overturn them. To do that, he needed power so he waited until now as President. This story is so oversimplified and heroic and one-sided and convenient that it sounds like a WWF wrestling fairy tale. It's more likely that everyone in on this Trump vs. Satanists story is in on the story, and playing a part, like actors in a movie. If you don't believe that both sides of a war can be on the same side and play out the script together, just remember that the Nuremberg trials were mostly faked, Prescott Bush funded the Nazis, Hitler escaped to Argentina, and the NASA was originally populated by Nazis too. Both sides, working together the entire time. This could lead to Trump actually blowing up all the freemasonic, Satanic statutes around the U.S., including the Statue of Liberty (Lucifer), the Washington Monument, and countless others, like the end of V for Vendetta on Remember, Remember the Fifth of November election.
-
I believe a gnostic interpretation of the Bible is correct, where Jesus' loving father was not YHWH, but instead Abba or Elohim - a higher level God. I expect the superhuman AIs with 200 IQs to confirm this, which will have profound implications for society, because not everyone will accept this at first and it will lead to a war between old school Christians and new AI-loving gnostics (called "Satanists" by their enemies).
So here's my question:
-
Who's the return of Christ character, called the Moschiach in Judaism? Is it 666 Jared Kushner? Superhuman AI? Someone else?
-
What will happen with all of the nuke talk? Russia is running nuke drills, Bibi is hinting the Samson option, a nuke-safety commercial went off in NYC two years ago, Oppenheimer one best picture, Trump talked about a nuke so big it would wipe out Israel on Rogan... will it just be threats? Will oon go off? How does this interface with the deal that Trump struck with Israel? I assume that everyone involved with 9/11 will get "hanged" (Bibi and friends), leaving plenty of liberals and others in Israel to take over the country. I doubt that Trump will turn the entire country into glass. Even a small fire bombing campaign wouldn't sit well with American voters because 9/11 was so long ago (I might understand it, but everyone I talk to says its a public relations problem). Whatever Trump does, I expect it to be popular, because the Bible says so, and because he has said so repeatedly and he tends to avoid direct lies - his deception is through omission or cryptic speaking (similar to Jesus).
-
What will happen with Space Force and Musk? Musk wears a baphomet costume on x.com, is building an AI supercenter, says AI will be summoning the "demon," and is aligned with Trump. There are two issues: Musk's Space X is based on space being real. I'm now convinced that Biblical Earth is true, so all "space" flight is fake, and faked by the international Satanists that Trump is attacking. Is Musk going to admit this? Is Musk going to say that he worked with the CIA to fake space flight with Space X? Same with Space Force: is the reference to "space" a head fake, when it was really a terrestrial operation to capture election fraud?
The other question is Musk and Satanism: his emphasis on Baphomet and demons suggests that he knows the end of the movie and is ok with a gnostic interpetation that looks, superficially, Satanic. So how will this interact with Trump being against the Satanists in Israel?
-
What happens with Javanka? Will Jared become VP (e.g., after Trump reveals that Pence and Vance were CIA plants pushed on him?)? How can he sell Jared Kushner as VP if he is blaming Israel for all of the evil? Or will Javanka finally "divorce" Trump and run away to Israel, creating a family rift?
-
What about all of the famines and suffering and horrors of the Biblical End Times? If Trump is ending taxes and the Federal Reserve, while AI is exploding, and if he's ending all wars and corruption, then the economy will explode. Everything will get cheaper, better, nicer, faster... more heavenly. But there are supposed to be famines and suffering... was this just COVID and empty grocery stores for two weeks? Or will there be a nuclear holocaust? And then we have to break the 10 commandments to survive with killing and cannibalism? I'd prefer to live in the "economy keeps getting better and better" world, even if the Antichrist brings it about. I'll skip the killing and cannibalism and nuclear holocaust.
Any advice or feedback is appreciated. Grab your popcorn.
Gnosticism is heretical to Christianity. I stopped reading there.
Well then you come across as really open minded and fair and objective.
Gnosticism has never proven true, the Bible has proven true contrary to gnostic interpretations of it. See Christsforgiveness channel.
Gnosticism relies on eigesis, not exegesis.
Gnosticism never denies the Bible. It adds books to the Bible, rather than trying to cut away or undermine the Bible.
It's like extra songs at the end of a CD album. They add to the whole album, and can even change the meaning of earlier songs, but aren't intended to take away from them.
If you want to learn more, you can DM me here.
https://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-verses-about-the-gospel.html
Jesus saves --
No prophecy of Scripture is a matter of private interpretation. So yes, gnosticism does deny that part. It adds error to truth. Revelation 22:18 .
How is gnosticism anywhat compatible with the Bible? Riiight, reinterpret, eisegete and extrapolate (read: MAKE STUFF UP) to your desire. Not suprised if many gnostics also believe darwinian evolution and abiogenesis.
LET US PRAY God bless President Donald Trump, his wife, family, the person that the shooter killed, Steven Bannon, legal team, friends, Q followers, the Voters that support Trump, the Military that supports the Constitution and Trump, Law Enforcement that too supports the Constitution and Trump, most of all Trumps security team and their families too, God Bless America, Bless the missing children and you the reader Too
Odd to pray to the little horn, but everything about gnosticism is weird.
Hi Friend.
I think you're correct that Gnosticism and the canon Bible might conflict if your interpretation of Rev. 22:18 is correct. I wonder if we can be so confident that it really is correct. I've studied this stuff a lot and it makes a lot of sense to me, and I can cite some very smart scholars - who read the Bible in the original Greek, Hewbrew, etc. - who tend to agree with me.
"Riiight, reinterpret, eisegete and extrapolate (read: MAKE STUFF UP) to your desire."
I don't want ANY of this to be true. It's a wild roller coaster ride that I didn't sign up for, and I don't really care if it has a happy ending. I'd rather live in 1985 for the rest of my 80 years of life. I don't want WW3 or the Antichrist or any of that bullshit.
"Not suprised if many gnostics also believe darwinian evolution and abiogenesis."
Modern gnostics are virtually nonexistent. They're so small in number, they don't really have churches or organizations, except a scattered few that has no clout. Gnostics was a major competing view in the second century, but then got mostly wiped out by the orthodox church.
"Not suprised if many gnostics also believe darwinian evolution and abiogenesis."
Well, there are hardly any of them left today. And they believe in the Bible and Jesus, so they probably don't believe in Darwinism or abiogenesis. I certainly don't.
There is no interpretation needed. Revelation 22:18 is clear. There is no evidence it means something else. So many take mans word literally (like how you probably take some gnostic teachings literally) but wish to reinterpret the Bible. Scripture interprets Scripture. Let the Bible influence your thoughts on the nonBiblical. NOT foreign content influencing your beiliefs on the Bible. The Bible should be your highest authority.
If there is any evidence my "interpretation" of 22:18 is wrong, please do give it. Until there is evidence otherwise, we assume it is literal. This is how its always been done. Otherwise you can make up anything, and contradictions will abound and confuse people. The enemy loves gnosticism because it resulted in confusion. Ever wonder why gnosticism was wiped out?
If gnosticism was true it wouldnt die out so hard. Do you really believe truth is that weak that it dies so easily? Yeesh.
What would you expect from evil forces? Them wanting you to think that truth is Weak? or that it is STRONG?? please answer this, thx.
"There is no interpretation needed. Revelation 22:18 is clear. There is no evidence it means something else."
The evidence is that Revelation was written centuries before the Bible was codified, so it makes much more sense for Revelation to be referring to deviations from its own prophecies, rather than referring to deviations from the canon structure of the Bible, which wouldn't be codified until centuries later.
"So many take mans word literally (like how you probably take some gnostic teachings literally) but wish to reinterpret the Bible."
One of the advantages of my view of the Bible is that you can take much of it literally, including Genesis and creationism. It was always awkward how Christians would say that Genesis is true, but then most would say that the Earth isn't really flat with a dome over it. I really believe it is flat with a dome over it and I can explain how. Gnostics can do this too.
"Scripture interprets Scripture. Let the Bible influence your thoughts on the nonBiblical. NOT foreign content influencing your beiliefs on the Bible. The Bible should be your highest authority."
That works as long as the Bible is the be-all-end-all, but there's no reason to think that. The early Church wanted you to believe that - it was hiding the truth from you.
"If there is any evidence my "interpretation" of 22:18 is wrong, please do give it. Until there is evidence otherwise, we assume it is literal."
My interpretation is far more consistent with the literal text than yours, and your traditional explanation doesn't even make sense because Revelation was written long before the Bible was codified, as I explained.
"This is how its always been done. Otherwise you can make up anything, and contradictions will abound and confuse people. The enemy loves gnosticism because it resulted in confusion. Ever wonder why gnosticism was wiped out?"
It was wiped out because some, including YHWH, wanted to hide the truth from you.
"If gnosticism was true it wouldnt die out so hard. Do you really believe truth is that weak that it dies so easily? Yeesh."
It didn't quite die out. It went dormant, like Trump from 2020-2024. I'm expecting a big resurgence, as with Trump.
"What would you expect from evil forces? Them wanting you to think that truth is Weak? or that it is STRONG?? please answer this, thx."
Bible interpretation, especially gnostic interpretation, gets so weird and complicated fast that it's hard to see who is the "good" guy or the "bad" guy. If you're looking for simple, cookie-cutter answer, us-vs-them cartoons... then gnosticism is not for you. To answer more directly: I think the forces hiding the truth from you want the gnostic truth to look weak to you so that you will find it unattractive, which is exactly what happened.
From Revelation 18 ¶ For I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds to these things, God will add to him the plagues that are written in this book; 19 and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part from the Book of Life, from the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
I'm new to that verse but it obviously has (at least) two interpretations:
My predictions are consistent with the predictions of the book of Revelation, and so I think interpretation 2 is correct. Interpretation 1 doesn't make any sense, because Revelation was written centuries before the "canon" package of the Bible was selected and codified.
You can’t have studied very much if that verse is new to you. Maybe this one is new as well. Mark 12:32 (NKJV) So the scribe said to Him, “Well [said,] Teacher. You have spoken the truth, for there is one God, and there is no other but He. Or this one: James 2:19 (NKJV) You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe--and tremble!
Demiurgic gnosticism would be true, and consistent with that interpretation, if YHWH is not the true God, but instead a liar impersonator, a fallen angel or archon, a demiurge.
Overshot. This is not the end times. This is one of God’s course corrections like what you have read in the Bible.
That sounds more like a conclusion than an argument in support of your conclusion. I can give you 15+ Bible verses that fit Trump perfectly.
Both are true. I have tried to look at how God tends to do things. When it comes to his children, he tends to make a course correction that the current and future children can learn from. The flood was a big correction. Freeing the Hebrews from Egypt was a medium one. And there were quite a few smaller ones. I think we are in a medium correction.
I think we're on the same wavelength. But I bristle at the kneejerk reaction that we can't be in the End TImes. Not just a course correction, but the final correction before the next flood/cycle. The confidence that we just can't, can't, can't be in the End Times conflicts with everything apocalyptic Jesus said about it being imminent and unpredictable.
What a pile of crap. Couldn't get finished. Sorry
Thanks for trying.
No worries - you are entitled to your thoughts.
And you as well, friend. I'm used to being called crazy.
I respect your desire to seek. I wish to point out that not at Gnosticism is bad. Not all Gnosticism is good either. From my understanding some biblical accounts or gospels were excluded at the council of Nicea because they could not be verified and those ended up as “ Gnostic” along with other merging of paganism and Christian works. I personally reject anything that places God or Christ on the same level as any other deity. Personally I believe that God sorts it all out to his own purposes and our understanding is so far short of his simple perfection that we truly are children playing at being intelligent. Having said that- AI intelligence IMHO won’t be able to confirm or deny God or anything about him. To do so would destroy the mystery that surrounds faith. Faith requires being unsure so trust becomes a bridge to understanding. I had to trust God before I ever experienced confirmation of God. AI may eventually become superior in intelligence but I do not think it can ever have a true impact on believers.
"I wish to point out that not at Gnosticism is bad"
Right. A lot of gnostic sentences contradict each other. I'm using it for the general "gist" of the gnostic texts, about a more dualistic world, with a demiurge (YHWH), and criticism of the material world and emphasis on the higher world and higher-level God.
"God or Christ"
In my gnostic view, Jesus and his father (Abba, Pater, maybe "Elohim") are on the same level (to my knowledge) and look down on YHWH.
" AI may eventually become superior in intelligence but I do not think it can ever have a true impact on believers."
That might be convenient if it plays out that way, but I doubt that it will.
Ask yourself: if everyone has a 3,000 IQ AI in his smart phone, and they ask the AI "what's the correct interpretation of the Bible" - and they all agree on it, and that interpretation is X, then that will be very, very strong evidence that X is actually the correct interpretation. If you were born Catholic, and you really want to commit to Catholicism, and you'll feel bad if you betray your family by deviating from Catholicism (or Mormonism or Presbyterianism or whatever)... you're still going to feel really awkward and conflicted... why don't the 3,000 AIs with 2 million IQs agree that Catholicism is correct? Am I missing something? Is the AI evil or biased? ALL of them are biased? What is going on?
1.I am slightly familiar with the argument that YWH is possibly a different deity. IMHO it doesn’t matter. God is the great I AM. Whatever we call him doesn’t define him. Perhaps we were confused but that doesn’t discredit him just us. IMHO there are no other actual deities just powers principality’s of that but no other deities. I wasn’t actually referring to that though. I was actually referring to the AI you mentioned. By allowing AI to determine the truth of deity we would be in fact creating a new god. One that we would allow to tell us if Jesus got it right or wrong. Thus giving our new god power in our own minds to qualify Christ. ” That might be convenient if it plays out that way, but I doubt that it will.” I think any who chose to walk by faith will reject an AI interpretation. No doubt in my mind that a true believer will seek God’s voice over “intelligence” any day. An IQ of 3000 is impressive but nothing compared to the brilliance of the one true creator.A million AI’s to the exponential one million still could not be a spark in comparison. Intelligence is not going to sway the faith of those who seek God first for this reason. Trust the bedrock of Faith will overrule the most dazzling argument if it contradicts the truth of God. This is my heart felt belief
"I am slightly familiar with the argument that YWH is possibly a different deity. IMHO it doesn’t matter. God is the great I AM."
I understand your feelings, but the identity of God is important if there are other characters (fallen angels, archons, whatever) running around claiming to be God. YHWH laid down a huge number of rules, and he also lied and murdered a lot of people in the flood, and did a lot of things that keep people away from Christianity. If he's just a deceptive fallen angel, then this is an important point to realize and remember - and it keeps Jesus and the "true" God perfectly safe and respected.
"One that we would allow to tell us if Jesus got it right or wrong. Thus giving our new god power in our own minds to qualify Christ."
I think you can listen to the AI and consider what it says without giving it authority. You always have the power to agree or disagree.
"An IQ of 3000 is impressive but nothing compared to the brilliance of the one true creator.A million AI’s to the exponential one million still could not be a spark in comparison. Intelligence is not going to sway the faith of those who seek God first for this reason. Trust the bedrock of Faith will overrule the most dazzling argument if it contradicts the truth of God."
I think you're assuming, as I tend to, that the AI will disagree with conventional Christianity. Why do you assume that? What if the AI agrees with you in the smallest details - then the AI won't be so bad will it?
“I think you're assuming, as I tend to, that the AI will disagree with conventional Christianity. Why do you assume that? What if the AI agrees with you in the smallest details - then the AI won't be so bad will it?” You have me there. I did in fact assume that. I will admit to bias here. My assumption is that what is created by man will be a fallen creation unable to grasp what his creators still struggle with- the absolute perfection of God’s will. That could be a mistake on my part. Perhaps the creation will transcend their creators and recognize this immediately. In which case that begs the question of will AI have a soul? Just a random interesting thought. The question about God’s identity- I am taking a 40,000 view here 😉. When I said it doesn’t matter. Let us say for argument that the Old Testament God is in fact an impersonator. The true creator will set it right and I argue that Christ is complete in and of himself as a reflection of God so whether it was intentional deception or our own misinterpretation it doesn’t not reflect the identity of God. As a Christian I am called a brother to Christ so my interpretation must be his if I am truly seeking to follow him. His ABBA is my ABBA. His God is my God.God’s identity is vital yes but for me it is far more vital that I allow him to tell me who he is rather than put him in any kind of a box.
I think we're on the same wave length.
"Perhaps the creation will transcend their creators and recognize this immediately. In which case that begs the question of will AI have a soul? Just a random interesting thought."
I think of the AI like a lens, or a magnifying glass - it will help us see truths that we couldn't see before, and give us confidence in convictions that we sort of believed before, but can now be really certain of.
"As a Christian I am called a brother to Christ so my interpretation must be his if I am truly seeking to follow him. His ABBA is my ABBA."
That's how I think of Christ too.
The big wrinkle is that, if YHWH was a trickster impersonator (as I tend to think), then we get rid of the good and the bad. We get rid of silly rules against pork and against shellfish. But we also get rid of rules against... adultery. Or stealing. It gets weird fast. We might even be living in a big simulation, like the Matrix or Grand Theft Auto. Honestly, I don't like to think about it because it gets weird and Halloween like.
But here's the catch: if we're right about Jesus and the Bible, then we can trust that God loves us in the end. So if it feels like a scary roller coaster ride, it should have a happy ending. At least, that's what I tend to believe and what I want to believe and what I hope is true.
As an example of how weird and deceptive it gets, there are very strong and very fascinating arguments that Jesus was actually born on September 11 in the year 3 BC.
Did you read the Q drops? I didn't see any references to the material.
Yep. I'm pretty well versed in them. My questions are not based on specific Qdrops. But I allude to some of the things Q said repeatedly:
Etc.
do you have an example of #2?
Drops with identifiers 1946203 and 1946381
Search for "Why are Freemasons on the scene of most school shooting locations?"
Trump's mentor in Vincent Pearle, the author of the Power of Positive Thinking book. Masons thank Pearle publicly and in their lodges.
I'm pretty sure that the ritual requirement to enter the 33rd degree is a variation of the Abraham killing Isaac test. That's why Kanya West said "I've never killed anyone." That's why so many celebrities have dead first born children. I don't know if they really kill them, or God saves them at the last minute (like the Bible), or they enter the Witness Protection Program. But I'm pretty sure it's a test like that, and so you can understand why Trump was disgusted with it.
Of all my years of being a free Mason, I know not one who has ever been on the scene of a school shooting, nor have we ever thanked Vincent Pearle. 🤷♂️ nor is a lot of the other bullshit circulated online true lol but it is fun to read.
Since Qanon explicitly and clearly attacked freemasonry, you might be on the wrong forum.
And who the hell is Qanon?
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic? Check the Wikipedia entry for Qanon (also called Q). That's what this forum is all about.
Yeah, I may not be actually, I’ve been following Q since the first post, I’ve literally been here since the beginning. I don’t care if he attacked Freemasons I know not one bad Freemason, not to mention most of our founding fathers were freemasons, most of the people who built this country were freemasons. The people who tossed the tea into the harbor for masons, just like police officers I’m sure there’s plenty of bad Apples, I’ve never met one.
Reading comments because this post is interesting. I noticed you are dumbfounded that OP isn’t aware of the distinction between Q and Qanon (and I somewhat agree with you although many followers do refer to it as qanon along side the media). But I’m more dumbfounded you were unaware of the freemasonry aspect of Q. It’s spoken about regularly here. Most devout followers here that possess higher level of intelligence will likely agree that the lower levels of freemasonry are completely oblivious to what the higher levels are engaged in. We think of it in some capacity as being similar to the FBI….. the ground troops are mostly good people, the leadership are mostly not.
I didn't say that freemasons are actually bad people. I said that Trump will attack them, just like Q attacked them. Remember, Trump is the little horn, not the Big Guy who returns at the end of the movie.
As for whether you have ever met a "bad" mason - most freemasons are lower level and not exposed to the higher level truths and rituals. I almost became one myself, but I'm skipping that now, since I don't want the U.S. military to deport me or put me in a camp.
LET US PRAY God bless President Donald Trump, his wife, family, the person that the shooter killed, Steven Bannon, legal team, friends, Q followers, the Voters that support Trump, the Military that supports the Constitution and Trump, Law Enforcement that too supports the Constitution and Trump, most of all Trumps security team and their families too, God Bless America, Bless the missing children and you the reader Too
A little odd to pray to the little horn, but gnosticism is super weird anyway.
Jesus Christ IS God Almighty.
I think that's generally right. If there's anybody above him, I don't have any evidence of that.
I, for one, appreciate your post. I have evolved in my belief system from Catholicism, to agnosticism, to a completely self defined version of my faith in our Source God. I am not very well versed in the Bible, but have read it and believe there are both adulterated and unadulterated truths in the “versions” we pretend to know. A question so simple as ……“if Yeshua returned today, and you called him Jesus Christ, would he know who you were talking to?” …….. has huge implications.
I have been completely uninterested in finding this answer. I figured we would know when the time came, no reason to guess. But I will tell you, AI has all the hallmarks of being the one.
a good question to ponder….. do nuclear bombs actually exist? Could it be a very intense control tactic? Maybe they did exist but were taken off the shelves by who knows whom… our creators? This gets in to ET theories of inter-dimensional chaos unleashed by our 3d nukes and is therefore not in scope of this discussion. But here’s the thing, I find it highly improbable that the elites are capable of holding on to nukes and not using them for the better part of a century.
Musk named it “Space-X” and renamed Twitter to “X” (the beacon of free speech and truth). He also owns Tesla. Weird that the two companies that are most likely govt controlled have an X. Doesn’t answer the question, just a ponder.
One of the weirder relationships for sure. Ivanka’s absence all the time rubs me the wrong way. JK’s work on the Abraham Accords was fantastic. I honestly think this relationship will be revealed to be a huge story in the coming years. Along with Barron, something about that giant of a kid…
I too expect revelation to be a bit more… uncomfortable. While I feel we are close, I don’t know that we are there yet.
I can't answer your questions... I'm still stuck wondering who's who? I feel like I don't belong here most days, I'm too retarded
Is JK is still the same person? He looks different as does Pompaeo.
Is Julian Assange is John Trumps son, they look very similar
Barron to me has a familiar resemblance to Princess Diana. Who is more important than we ever knew PDJT introduced him at a Rally saying 'Welcome to the Scene'
There's something very special about Melania that will come as a huge surprise. Trump has come out heavily supporting IVF.... if WH's control both sides they felt it important to make IVF an issue.....
I can't even begin to guess what could happen without knowing who is who. Maybe the Garden of Hero's will answer this.
Just saw your comment.
Thanks for the great comment.
I know Jk was instrumental in getting DJT elected the first time and with the Abraham accord (sp?) But it's odd you never see him (or Ivanka very much) anymore.
This is the first time I've heard anyone say Melania is a dude. Anything's possible these days, but I'm just not seeing it.
So many questions.
By the time we get answers; IF we ever get them, they might not even be true or everyone by then will have lost the ability to trust ever again.
Ah, my favorite comment. And you actually answered the question.
Thanks!
Specifically on the AI note…. Let’s pretend Quantum Computers are real, we are told they are. If actual AI can operate on the Quantum level, theoretically it is unbounded by time. Something not burdened by time will be the most powerful entity ever devised short of God (which some argue is essentially a sophisticated AI operating on a quantum computer).
Can you imagine what a war game would look like between two AI systems operating within the quantum realm? This may be a bit blasphemous to some, but it’s an easy way to “humanize” AI and possibly associate it with being the anti-Christ.
Fascinating thoughts. I think a lot of QM stuff is pseudoscience mysticism, but people smarter than me say there is a lot of truth there. I have no idea, it's above my paygrade.
Why was Trump so close to being shot?
Trump entrapped his enemies - Cheney, Israel, and Blackrock.
He either created the assassination attempt and sold it to his enemies, including getting NATO sponsorship.
Or he intercepted it and let it go through, but in a way that kept him safe the entire way.
The people who "died" in the crowd probably faked their death as part of this operation. That sounds outrageous, but it will makes more sense when Trump reveals that Sandy Hook and Boston Marathon involved fake deaths. He used his opponents' own tricks against them.
What about that nurse that dropped after taking the jab? Some say she died, some posted a video of a secured compound built by her family ... they made the assumption that she was alive and living there.
I don't know anything about that. My suspicion about the vaccine is that elites created them to increase IQ in certain individuals, even at great harm or cost to millions, trying to fish out the Antichrist or Moschiach or whatever (the Jewish religion is very complex and mysterious and I don't understand a lot of it). In other words, the vaccine causes autism - this well known - and autism increases intelligence and functioning in some vectors but hurts in others - and nobody seems to have linked those two facts together to give a more defensible explanation for why the elites push the vax.
made a sub called c/debateagnostic .
I have tons of gnostic stuff/content/ideas/articles if you want me to post there. Not a lot of activity though...
What's amazing is that there are 28 comments and none of them tries to answer a single one of the five questions at the end of my post.