The only component that's currently missing is the TRUE INFORMATION being given to The People. Once this occurs, which is just; the people can make just and true decisions based on the facts. WE HAVE TO HAVE REAL DATA TO WORK REALITY WITH. Not cover-ups and lies, half-truths, propaganda etc.
Robert B. Denhardt and Janet Vinzant Denhardt wrote this book called the New Public Service. Basically, citizens have more say on what the government should do, with active participation. Thus, power is bottom-up, rather than top-down. Often you'll see this at the local level, but rarely at the state or federal level. Very exciting times indeed.
Yes, the democratizing effect of the internet and software which has been described and predicted since they started up with message boards with dial-up connections. The terrible futuristic scare was that stating one's opinion just willy-nilly had to be curtailed. This has made cultures of people posting anon. And then THAT gets frowned upon. You know the drill.
All this time they were trying to prevent the inevitable.
Eventually social media and mobiles made another such wave. Much LoL and KEK.
Public Service literature is going through a paradigm shift currently, as managers in government offices find themselves having to analyse hundreds of performance graphs, that can be sliced all sorts of ways. Plus then are the multitucinous ways customers find their way into leaving messages. Humans 'out there' have to be responded to, and suddenly they find themselves facing daily ethical issues, because those 'other folks' do not fit in the cosy, inward-facing, law-reading, previous office bureaucracy. Part of the attempt from the eighties onwards was to run local governments like business, with the result of installing a CE (for operations), as well as a Mayor. Things are not easy, because the Mayor was supposed to be the voice of the people. The literature was indicating that CEs get paid as much as well-to-do politiians in Central Government - so one can see potential pitfalls in that system.
However, once all the employees are using sofware to process all the 'customers' (read: we the people), and they engage with people from all walks of life, (as is demonstrated in OP, by any means, so including on social media) What I mean is, this has a flattening effect on power structures that rely on who's-the-boss office hierarchies, and can be truly represent the voice of the people.
There are honest people out there with more to offer. Many independent political commentators have a better grasp of what the people want, common sense, and fair play.
Dispense with the compromised, corrupt and those beholden to the big corporations and wealthy lobbyists, ignoring and belittling the average voter.
Their time is past, Its time for us to tell them how we want things run.
Have people who care about making their country and the world a better place.
Am I reading the site nominees correctly? It looks like Fauci is in the running?? And Pete Buttigiege?? What am I missing?
I saw the actions taken after Pres Trump asked if Haley and Pompeo should be brought in to his admin. Answer: no and they got let go.
Ok pedes go to the nominees site and upvote my nominee! No one had nominated Q yet so I just did. We will see if they let it stand . It may not show up for a day or so, we will see.
https://nominees.mahanow.org/
https://www.policiesforpeople.com
Thank you for posting the links
yw👊
Thanks winn! 👏👏👏
Thanks winn, just got a new place to hang out.
That's great.
Voice of the people.
The only component that's currently missing is the TRUE INFORMATION being given to The People. Once this occurs, which is just; the people can make just and true decisions based on the facts. WE HAVE TO HAVE REAL DATA TO WORK REALITY WITH. Not cover-ups and lies, half-truths, propaganda etc.
Thank you, wow I will use these, you are awesome.
Robert B. Denhardt and Janet Vinzant Denhardt wrote this book called the New Public Service. Basically, citizens have more say on what the government should do, with active participation. Thus, power is bottom-up, rather than top-down. Often you'll see this at the local level, but rarely at the state or federal level. Very exciting times indeed.
Yes, the democratizing effect of the internet and software which has been described and predicted since they started up with message boards with dial-up connections. The terrible futuristic scare was that stating one's opinion just willy-nilly had to be curtailed. This has made cultures of people posting anon. And then THAT gets frowned upon. You know the drill.
All this time they were trying to prevent the inevitable.
Eventually social media and mobiles made another such wave. Much LoL and KEK.
Public Service literature is going through a paradigm shift currently, as managers in government offices find themselves having to analyse hundreds of performance graphs, that can be sliced all sorts of ways. Plus then are the multitucinous ways customers find their way into leaving messages. Humans 'out there' have to be responded to, and suddenly they find themselves facing daily ethical issues, because those 'other folks' do not fit in the cosy, inward-facing, law-reading, previous office bureaucracy. Part of the attempt from the eighties onwards was to run local governments like business, with the result of installing a CE (for operations), as well as a Mayor. Things are not easy, because the Mayor was supposed to be the voice of the people. The literature was indicating that CEs get paid as much as well-to-do politiians in Central Government - so one can see potential pitfalls in that system.
However, once all the employees are using sofware to process all the 'customers' (read: we the people), and they engage with people from all walks of life, (as is demonstrated in OP, by any means, so including on social media) What I mean is, this has a flattening effect on power structures that rely on who's-the-boss office hierarchies, and can be truly represent the voice of the people.
This is how it should be.
Get rid of Career Politicians.
There are honest people out there with more to offer. Many independent political commentators have a better grasp of what the people want, common sense, and fair play.
Dispense with the compromised, corrupt and those beholden to the big corporations and wealthy lobbyists, ignoring and belittling the average voter.
Their time is past, Its time for us to tell them how we want things run.
Have people who care about making their country and the world a better place.
This deserves a sticky. Thats pretty ground breaking
Well fren you could always https://files.catbox.moe/1exacs.jpeg
😉👍
Giving actual representation to the people in a Representative Republic, imagine that
I can’t call my senator about senate majority leader because they, as liberals, would sabotage.
Am I reading the site nominees correctly? It looks like Fauci is in the running?? And Pete Buttigiege?? What am I missing? I saw the actions taken after Pres Trump asked if Haley and Pompeo should be brought in to his admin. Answer: no and they got let go.
Democrats will sign up and push their losers to the top of the list
We need to use our combined power as the ones who gave Pres Trump the popular vote! We can affect anything we want to.
I've been voting on it.
Democratize lobbying.
Ok pedes go to the nominees site and upvote my nominee! No one had nominated Q yet so I just did. We will see if they let it stand . It may not show up for a day or so, we will see.
Marked to check when pain meds wear off.