I'm glad Schiff is worried about prosecutions. :>)
He's smart enough to know that HE will be targeted for prosecution too. It's always more enjoyable when they see it coming... but know it can't be stopped.
That depends on your definition of 'valid' evidence.
They were trying to connect: a record of 'legal expenses' (which in robo-accounting is valid, as it is not, for example, a repairs and maintenance expense, or a cost of goods sold expense) - with the intent to sway an election.
The legal dots were so far apart, that the judge had to prevent defense evidence from entering the chat. Yes the whole thing was a scam, and yes those people should be hiding under their duvet in shame, and more.
This is their defense? Shifty Schiff? Where are the screaming pundits and panels of disagreeing legal experts? Dim defenses are weakening.
Glad she is living in his head…probably losing sleep with panic.
It wasn't "valid evidence," Pencil Neck. It was concocted lies.
THAT is why they should absolutely be prosecuted, and so should you.
That pedo misses the point as usual. She is going g to prosecute the corrupt prosecutors and investigators. How many are you tied to rat face?
Isn't there some law that will just shut this guy up? !!
Hmmm. The Grim Reaper law?
“A grand jury found probable cause to believe Donald Trump committed crimes. That's not a basis to go after them."
The American people who gave a mandate to Trump disagree, Adam.
The people responsible for the “Get Trump” op at the Biden DOJ must be held to account.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1860699560059842560/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/kQbnxvRfuVcFNh3p.mp4
A rigged GJ in a TDS town
I'm glad Schiff is worried about prosecutions. :>)
He's smart enough to know that HE will be targeted for prosecution too. It's always more enjoyable when they see it coming... but know it can't be stopped.
still waiting for schiffhead to show us the evidence he claimed he had of russian collusion...
Schiff needs a tribunal
If she will prosecute this POS, I'll forget about the prosecutors!
That depends on your definition of 'valid' evidence.
They were trying to connect: a record of 'legal expenses' (which in robo-accounting is valid, as it is not, for example, a repairs and maintenance expense, or a cost of goods sold expense) - with the intent to sway an election.
The legal dots were so far apart, that the judge had to prevent defense evidence from entering the chat. Yes the whole thing was a scam, and yes those people should be hiding under their duvet in shame, and more.
She will prove there was no valid evidence, therefore the prosecutors will be prosecuted
Shifty can go first
Please prosecute him or schumer first!!
Same questions in reverse. On a strictly no bias, fair assessment, you, Pencil Neck, are so screwed.