What do you mean, exactly? Federal Government should “be in control of” the military? Their drones / drills / missions? Curious as to the reasoning and conclusion that the federal govt control of drones would be desirable and/or necessary. Would that not then force branches of military to close their own air space?
If someone on X could post radio traffic of an Air Force Base closing its own air space for “unknown UAP” activity, I would think that branch of military has a purpose for that action, traffic, and language used. Nevertheless, I’m not sure why or how the Fed govt would be sovereign over military since military law is not subject to federal law, at baseline.
Wright-Patterson was the confirmed site of Project Sign — later Project Grudge, and later still, Project Blue Book — an official government study of UFOs. This secretive government research project was officially “terminated” in 1969, but I think we can all agree that it’s definitely ongoing.
My dad was an AF radio tech back in 61-63 and was stationed there. One night after consuming too many wooble-pops, he found himself somehow "lost" on his way back to the barracks and in an area of the base he'd never been before.
He was discovered by a couple MP's with their 🔫 drawn who were VERY unhappy with his presence and promptly instructed him to go back the way he came.
That’s what I think also. If they are operating drones for missions related to protecting the homeland and citizens, then closing their own air space to allow only their drone operations would make sense (?) unless closing means something else?
I can get on board with their appearance (genuine or not) of not knowing the origins and intentions of ufo/uaf/ uap, but… FAA regulated (actual) drones? The U.S. military 100% knows the drones. It defies logic and reason for them to “not know.”
Sterilization of airspace:
"Military sterilize airspace" means to effectively clear a specific area of airspace of any potential hostile aircraft, essentially making it safe for friendly military operations by actively monitoring and eliminating any unidentified or enemy aircraft within that zone; it implies a high level of air dominance and control over that airspace, often achieved through radar surveillance and fighter aircraft presence.
Key points to remember:
Active monitoring:
This isn't just about keeping other aircraft out, but actively scanning the airspace to detect and respond to any potential threats.
Military operations:
The primary goal is to create a safe environment for friendly military aircraft to operate within a designated area.
Air superiority:
A "sterilized airspace" indicates a strong military presence that effectively prevents enemy aircraft from entering the zone.
Curious, then, as to what potential craft the Air Force would be eliminating from their air space for proper air space closure (?) U.S. citizens snooping with their drones? Two guys arrested for operating drones at airports, why not elsewhere? 🤷♀️
If our government was in control of them the airbases wouldn't be shutting down.
That might be the very point.
Looks like the govt is at war with itself.
What do you mean, exactly? Federal Government should “be in control of” the military? Their drones / drills / missions? Curious as to the reasoning and conclusion that the federal govt control of drones would be desirable and/or necessary. Would that not then force branches of military to close their own air space?
If someone on X could post radio traffic of an Air Force Base closing its own air space for “unknown UAP” activity, I would think that branch of military has a purpose for that action, traffic, and language used. Nevertheless, I’m not sure why or how the Fed govt would be sovereign over military since military law is not subject to federal law, at baseline.
The airbases would shut down flight ops if they need the drones in the airspace sea ching for whatever it is they're searching for.
The govt has the capability to jam anything and everything that operates electronically.
The real area 51
Wright-Patterson was the confirmed site of Project Sign — later Project Grudge, and later still, Project Blue Book — an official government study of UFOs. This secretive government research project was officially “terminated” in 1969, but I think we can all agree that it’s definitely ongoing.
Bingo
My dad was an AF radio tech back in 61-63 and was stationed there. One night after consuming too many wooble-pops, he found himself somehow "lost" on his way back to the barracks and in an area of the base he'd never been before.
He was discovered by a couple MP's with their 🔫 drawn who were VERY unhappy with his presence and promptly instructed him to go back the way he came.
You know what. This is one thing that brings both sides together. I love it. I can share this with anti-Trump frens.
u/#q365
Broken
The plot thickens.
Sterilize the airspace after you leave the area.
Not sure what that actually means. Sterilize how?
Rather than shooting them down they are hiding from them. Pitiful.
Or maybe.... they ARE them.
That’s what I think also. If they are operating drones for missions related to protecting the homeland and citizens, then closing their own air space to allow only their drone operations would make sense (?) unless closing means something else?
I can get on board with their appearance (genuine or not) of not knowing the origins and intentions of ufo/uaf/ uap, but… FAA regulated (actual) drones? The U.S. military 100% knows the drones. It defies logic and reason for them to “not know.”
Sterilization of airspace:
"Military sterilize airspace" means to effectively clear a specific area of airspace of any potential hostile aircraft, essentially making it safe for friendly military operations by actively monitoring and eliminating any unidentified or enemy aircraft within that zone; it implies a high level of air dominance and control over that airspace, often achieved through radar surveillance and fighter aircraft presence. Key points to remember: Active monitoring: This isn't just about keeping other aircraft out, but actively scanning the airspace to detect and respond to any potential threats. Military operations: The primary goal is to create a safe environment for friendly military aircraft to operate within a designated area. Air superiority: A "sterilized airspace" indicates a strong military presence that effectively prevents enemy aircraft from entering the zone.
Curious, then, as to what potential craft the Air Force would be eliminating from their air space for proper air space closure (?) U.S. citizens snooping with their drones? Two guys arrested for operating drones at airports, why not elsewhere? 🤷♀️
I used Sterispace, NOAA Fisheries, and FlyandWire online resources to determine “sterilization of airspace (military)” definitions/meanings.
Shoot and ask questions later? How do you know it's not the white hats scanning for threats?
Wouldn’t the military at least know it was ours? If so, why shut down the base? Very curious.
They’re going underground though