Usually asking people if they've ever seen images of planes that have hit birds makes them at least stop a think for a second. Sometimes, you get lucky and you see their eyes widen a bit and they go " heeeeeyyyy.... yyyeeeeaaa what the fuck..."
But..... There's one video where the nose of the plane does poke though, and emerges on the other side for one or two frames. Oopsies! People use that as a proof of CGI. Just sayin. I wasn't there. I listen to everything and say, Hmmmmmmm.....
True, that one is very weird, and it's also visible from another angle close up, but i can't find that one. But you can kind of see it in this angle. Pause the vid and you can use comma and period to go frame by frame. I guess it could've been part of an engine, since the Tower had gaps in between the steel pillars, and the office space is completely open from one wall to the other except for the small core of the building. However the debris is at the front of the explosion, and does slightly look similar to the shape of the nose in the news angle.
The more I look at it the more I think it is just a combination of wall debris combined with the plane, and they have the same height and shape as the tube of the fuselage because that's where the majority of the force comes from before the fuel explodes. And you can see it's moving slower than the speed of the plane. And it might even be a thin slice of the nose of the plane being shredded but the cross section makes it through the gap in the wall.
However I also wouldn't put it passed them to deliberately do CGI like that just to poison the well, and fool people into thinking that shot is a CGI nose, therefore all footage must've been CGI. It really helps drive people away from looking into 9/11 because the no plane theory doesn't make sense, since 10,000+ people saw the planes with their own eyes, and 100s filmed it with their own cameras.
Makes you wonder if the Korean crash also caused a concrete and steel building 1/4 mile away that wasn't hit to also collapse.
Usually asking people if they've ever seen images of planes that have hit birds makes them at least stop a think for a second. Sometimes, you get lucky and you see their eyes widen a bit and they go " heeeeeyyyy.... yyyeeeeaaa what the fuck..."
I've had three bird strikes in my forty years as a pilot.
None of them damaged the plane.
Definitely seen a few problems when they get sucked in the engine ... I seem to recall that goose impacts were a news story twenty years ago or so...
Our engines were mounted at the aft end of the fuselage. I think having them out on the wings is a better bird vacuum cleaner.
I would imagine so
Yes, my experiences were similar, but all were on climb out.
I saw a chunk of I-beam from the twin towers in a museum. No way is a plane a match for that!
But if you shoot a lead bullet at a steel plate it will flatten and spatter.
Great video on all the plane "issues" in 2024 with good analysis.
https://rumble.com/v64c0kj-declas-with-rambo-and-dave-special-guest-stormy-patriot-joe.html
I wonder if these commercial airline "issues" are an attempt to create a "concern" about flying?
Haven't flown since 911...I am concerned
I'm concerned that more people aren't concerned.
Didn't exactly come out the other side of the towers without a scratch
But..... There's one video where the nose of the plane does poke though, and emerges on the other side for one or two frames. Oopsies! People use that as a proof of CGI. Just sayin. I wasn't there. I listen to everything and say, Hmmmmmmm.....
True, that one is very weird, and it's also visible from another angle close up, but i can't find that one. But you can kind of see it in this angle. Pause the vid and you can use comma and period to go frame by frame. I guess it could've been part of an engine, since the Tower had gaps in between the steel pillars, and the office space is completely open from one wall to the other except for the small core of the building. However the debris is at the front of the explosion, and does slightly look similar to the shape of the nose in the news angle.
The more I look at it the more I think it is just a combination of wall debris combined with the plane, and they have the same height and shape as the tube of the fuselage because that's where the majority of the force comes from before the fuel explodes. And you can see it's moving slower than the speed of the plane. And it might even be a thin slice of the nose of the plane being shredded but the cross section makes it through the gap in the wall.
However I also wouldn't put it passed them to deliberately do CGI like that just to poison the well, and fool people into thinking that shot is a CGI nose, therefore all footage must've been CGI. It really helps drive people away from looking into 9/11 because the no plane theory doesn't make sense, since 10,000+ people saw the planes with their own eyes, and 100s filmed it with their own cameras.