Two questions about the moon landing fakery theory. If we didn't land on the moon:
- How do we return with pictures of the earth from space?
- How is it that a laser can be reflected of a mirrors left on the moon's surface?
Two questions about the moon landing fakery theory. If we didn't land on the moon:
item 2
Interesting. Thanks.
Plasma mirror achieved reflectivity >70% in experiment: https://indico.eli-np.ro/event/72/contributions/137/attachments/148/217/MO_Cernaianu_ELI-NP_Summer_School.pdf
The moon is likely ionized plasma at the altitude of krypton gas (ionosphere). It is local and naturally reflective to lasers. Spectral imaging of the moon matches that of ionized krypton gas. This is why the moonlight is colder than shade. If you watch the moon every night for 1 year, you will see stars THROUGH it at some point (dark areas are semi-transparent plasma and show the sky behind). It is a composite image we see with the “rays” (spherical looking lines) an x-ray like projected image of the center of the firmament crystalline dome onto the plasma moon, imo.
Basic fuel burn and capacity calculations show that none of the Apollo missions had the fuel needed to travel the distance to/from claimed. It is unlikely one can physically land on a plasma anyway, but one might be able to visit a structure hiding behind the non transparent parts of the moon. Apollo may have done this secretly.
Noble gases exist in the atmosphere based on density and are ionized by the sun and x-rays reflected off the crystalline firmament (suspected to be quartzlike yellowish “glass”). Higher altitude is lower density. Highest altitude to lowest is helium, neon, argon, KRYPTON, xenon, radon, etc., each with a distinct color when ionized: https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/courses-images/wp-content/uploads/sites/752/2016/09/26194613/neon-20tubes.png
Note the look and color of the light of the ionized krypton noble gas.
How did they get a camera outside the lunar lander to show Armstrong leaving the unit for the first time?
item 1
We went to the moon but it wasn't broadcast live. They already knew there was crazy unknown shit flying around up there and they sure af weren't going to show some crazy shit to the nation by accident on a live broadcast. They made some movie magic and showed us that instead.
Knowing how our government wants full control of what we're informed about, only this makes sense.
I think it's something like this. Half the footage is real, half is faked. The astronauts' press conference after returning is very odd. Instead of beaming with pride, they look and sound dejected. Like they were commanded not to talk about something they really wanted to talk about.
u/#q2225
Bill Cooper talked about the military’s space program that was more secretive: http://www.hourofthetime.com/bcmp3/492.mp3
We’ve been to the moon, but we’ve had more advanced craft going back to the decade post WW2.
Elon days we sent to the moon. So I am conflicted. I think maybe the publicized event was the fakery... and the reality is that we have been many secretive times for decades and our real "moon mission" is what the deep state wants hidden just like other military bases etc are hidden. Everyone pretty much knows by now that there are structures on the dark side of the moon.
“To the moon” is different than “landing on the moon”. There is likely something behind the non-transparent parts of the moon that we cannot see. Dark areas are semi-transparent (stars can be seen through). Lighter areas are opaque and something could be behind. Go look at Pink Floyd’s “The Dark Side of the Moon” album. It is soft disclosure of “light” being used to “hide in plain sight”. Album released 01MAR1973 (3-1-73): https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dark_Side_of_the_Moon
Last Apollo mission was Apollo 17 on 19DEC1972. They launched “33 astronauts in 11 missions” and used the name “Apollo” for a reason. Official funding “end date” suspected to be 25DEC1972; 66 day delta to 01MAR1973.
https://dqydj.com/days-calculator/
Must watch: https://youtu.be/xciCJfbTvE4?si=VgqziMHO0dTNsT1Z
Getting really tired of all the accumulated bullshit and lies that just keeps getting bigger...
It's high time we know the truth if our existence, our realm and our future.
AND the truth about why all the secrecy.
Things are SO FUCKED UP already, that no true narrative is going to alter anyone's life and make it worse than the already bleak future most imagine already these days.
If aliens are going to harvest us or the cyclical cataclysmic reset is going to happen - IDGAF. Just say it how it is already. It's like groundhog's day up in here...
All MUST be revealed...
Check out the movie (documentary?) called Capricorn One.
They killed the 3 astronauts in Capricorn One [05MAY1978, US] for “leaving the reservation”. Note that they each fled in a different compass direction. “Capricorn” in the title refers to the winter solstice location of the sun (from North America perspective) as it rotates under the overhead astronomical clock (used for celestial navigation to travel to ALL parts of Earth).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capricorn_One
It is being highlighted as soft disclosure of the Precession of the Equinox and how Tropic of “Capricorn” on all maps is incorrect. Capricorn is leftover from Age of Aries which ended 2,164 years ago (140BC) when Age of Pisces was entered then and ended in 2020, 2160 years later (after a 30deg arc rotation of the sky). During Pisces it should have been “Tropic of Saggitarius” on all maps, and should now be “Tropic of Scorpio” under Age of Aquarius on all maps since 18FEB2020. We don’t even know where or when we are by intentional obfuscation. Not a single map is known to exist that would allow proper sea navigation using the stars for the period 140BC to 2020AD.
Under Age of Aquarius (since 18FEB2020):
Spring Equinox sector of sky: Aquarius (Sun near equator)
Summer Solstice sector of sky: Taurus (Sun nearest northern latitude, i.e. Tropic of Taurus, not Cancer)
Fall Equinox sector of sky: Leo (Sun near equator)
Winter Solstice sector of sky: Scorpio (Sun nearest southern latitude, i.e. currently Tropic of Scorpio, not Capricorn which is from 2300BC-140BC celestial alignment)
Q 2225. Landing you saw or see is a movie. Real landings used tech you know nothing of. Stems from way back, and we've had it since 1930s; known before then, to be sure. Fully operational 1938. "P2", Los Alamos.
We went to the moon. This is dumb. I know an engineer still living who was crawling all over the Saturn five rocket engine in its development stage. He knew many of the astronauts while in Huntsville. This discredits in my mind folks who keep pushing this narrative.
the "rocket" and its engines wouldn't have been faked. use unlimited government money to create an operation of yes men to then ultimately convince you it had to be real because you know a person that worked building the rocket that likely had no chance of reaching "the moon".
maybe the moon exists and maybe we landed there, or maybe it doesn't and we didn't. I don't think the goal of awakening is to decide or determine which is accurate, but instead to recognize that all reasonably imagined realities, and then some, are on the table