Greenland Vote results starting to come in pro USA party going well - Will the EU cancel the election????
(twitter.com)
See Top Comment
Comments (22)
sorted by:
spongebob 24 hours later meme
"We found significant fraud in the election and will be cancelling it."
FAFO on that, idiots!
Damn that’s a lot more participation than in 2023. Clearly they are motivated to change their lives. Interesting battle between the left and the proUSA voters. Seems familiar. I love the idea of working with Greenland because I know it will be mutually beneficial.
I love the idea of working with Greenland, but it should be like working with Texas, and Hawaii, all as US states
[enter with rare earth elements and such a small population, Greenlanders are rich!
Like Iceland, Greenland also has huge geothermal gifts. Unlike Iceland, Greenland's geothermal resources are mostly untapped.
Then yesterday, I see in the news where they are looking to energize datacenters with ... geothermal energy.
https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/1899642752448840129
Looks like they won?
https://media.scored.co/post/mbRikoYQF3VV.jpeg
The Naleraq got 2nd place with 24.77% of the vote. The democrats got 30.26% of the vote. Both parties are pro independence but have different political views. The election should benefit the USA.
Edit: This is with 91.67% reporting
30.26% Victory doesn't seem like much unity in Greenland.
Anyone have a primer on how their governing works with less than a third of the votes?
Here's what Wikipedia says: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Greenland
(See link above for chart.)
Looks like Canada will have to settle for being the 52nd state?
No
https://qinersineq.gl/
Greenland is ours. It always has been
The first humans in the Americas were Whites https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solutrean_hypothesis. They arrived Greenland from Europe c.21,000 years ago.
The first documented Whites in America were in Greenland https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norse_settlements_in_Greenland around 1,000 years ago.
America acquired their claims on independence as the leader of all the Europeans of America https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifest_destiny
That made all of North America (and honestly all of South and Central America too) our land; but Greenland was the core territory.
Greenland was also given to the USA as compensation for liberating it from Denmark during WW2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenland_in_World_War_II
It was then fake surrendered to them by the Cabal
Upvote for providing the links in support.
TBF they're all wikipedia links though
Yep. But even they beat nothing.
Would be awesome if Trump makes it the 52nd state, reserving 51 for Canada's future addition lmao
How long before Puerto Rico want’s to be added? Mexico? I’d like to see Cuba go from communist to pro MAGA and join. But then I feel we’d become what we hate…globalist.
Not Globalist if our federal government is small and the majority of the power rests in the individual states hands. That would be more akin to our founding father's idea of the Republic.
That's the dream. The reality is the more cultural and religious diversity, the more difficult to get things done. That's why the Soviet Union had a hard time. There were so many diverse cultures, languages, religions, customs, etc. that trying to get rid of all of that was practically impossible without the threat of constant force.
Look at Canada. Quebec is French speaking and always outside the orbit of the rest of Canada. They'd probably prefer to succeed than be part of the country but that creates a lot of expensive problems too difficult to overcome. Many would love to jettison CA from the US since they are constantly leaning insanely left. But that will never happen.
Federalism works well when people are in alignment with each other. The further away from a unified culture a state gets, the more difficult things get. Sure there can be differences in foods, music, heritage, etc. but if the state isn't 100% pro USA, it would be a nightmare.
At 40%, that would only be a plurality. It is typical in such cases to exclude the poorly-performing parties and have a run-off election between the two major parties. (If you had a 3-way runoff, that could still result in a plurality standoff.)