RFK Jr. blackmail? If true, not good.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (138)
sorted by:
No idea why the mods would want to sticky an anti-Q influencer. Might as well start promoting CNN and MSDNC articles too.
How about because if it is true it is a huge problem!
No sources, no evidence, just rumours and innuendo.
72 hour rule.
This.
And hardly any story. I had to get about halfway into it before the flustered guy was able to hint at what "the story" was, and it seemed like old news anyway.
This Ian dude is honestly getting extremely annoying.
Multiple angles seem coordinated among the influenceables
It's a huge problem for the people that are trying to blackmail him. From what I understand is that he dated a woman and sent her a dick pic. Big deal.
Depends on whose dick it was.
🤣🤣🤣
Everyone in power has something on them.
He was sus, "" you knew I was a scorpion when you let me in"".
Wrong forum. Why are you even here? It is anti-Q to call the anons nut cases and whackos.
As for CO, she's just another influencer like Ben Shapiro, AJ and Ian Carroll. They come in all colors and flavors. I don't get emotionally invested in any of them. I'll just stick with the proven, POTUS and Q.
There are way too many coincidences for it to be false. It is statistically impossible. Q is real.
To borrow a line from "The Princess Bride," regarding "statistically impossible": "I don't think that phrase means what you think it means."
Then we might as well link Harry Sisson videos here too just in case he might be right. I am not going to waste my time watching some anti Q streamer I can think for myself, even if Dogsoldier hadn't said that I probably would have stopped the video after 30 seconds, if i had clicked on it at all. Why? Because I figure that RFK jr, and Trump and the Q team are smarter than the deep state. As far as I'm concerned RFKjr has one of the toughest job going after the throat of big pharma of course they're going to try things. If jr indeed has something truly compromising in his past don't you think that Trump and the team would have been aware and not put him in that position?
Oh, and telling me Candace Owens did the first video... well that's not exactly a selling point for me, not a fan.
I trust President Trump, I trust the Q team I've seen enough to know that it's for real . I don't trust some anti Q streamer or Candace Owens, or you. You certainly are giving a good try at shilling though, someone paying you or are you doing this one your own? As it is you've made it on my ignore list have a nice day. And oh noes! someone cheated on their wife? I'll alert the media! Oh wait you've got that covered!
Side bar——-> QProofs.com, also Book of Q Proofs v1.3
And that still failed.
You insult everyone here, insisting they aren't because you're providing yourself as an example in contrast.
Again, you insult everyone here, insisting they aren't.
It's entirely laughable that you think people here don't ask hard questions, or aren't suspicious.
As an self-appointed envoy of this rag-tag group of Q followers, I hereby state that we've asked more hard questions and have been more suspicious than any other group on the internet.
You're saying that to a forum that consists entirely of 10th men.
If ever we need an alternate opinion, all we have to do is listen to the MSM for a minute.
My heart stopped at the headline.
THANK YOU for your comments!
The guy cant go around promoting Q to the general public...You all have to know that by now.
I thought anons would understand this by now but I find so many still react like normies. This guy Ian is doing a tremendous job of redpilling people on social media, so is Candace.
I mean FFS Q talked about this concept and we have ALL seen this drop umpteen times. If people like Ian started talking about Q he would be labeled a Qanon guy and a great many people would tune him out. Think of all the FoxNewsBros and Patriots.win people on the right.
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]? DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
There's a sizeable distinction between someone who doesn't promote Q, and someone who actively disses Q.
You're oblivious to that distinction.
Training