The diamonds have to be returned. Remember that time my husband got into a hammer fight with a male prostitute in their bedroom. I cannot recount the times I have had romantic hammer fights with male prostitutes. It's perfectly normal for congressional leaders to have these bedroom antics. You normies don't know how to relax like the elites.
Its worse than just cheating. Its manipulating laws to support their personal gains, even when that means passing laws that harm America, or stopping bills that would help Americans.
This is the same thing as sports players betting on their own games - they change the outcome personally because losing is more profitable and easier to accomplish.
Historically, members of Congress have been able to profit from insider trading due to the nature of their positions, which often provide access to non-public, material information about companies, industries, or upcoming legislation that could affect markets. Until 2012, there was no explicit law prohibiting members of Congress or their staff from trading on such information, creating a legal gray area.
This issue gained significant attention in the early 2000s. For example, studies like one published in The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (2004) by Ziobrowski et al. found that U.S. senators’ stock trades outperformed the market by about 12% annually between 1993 and 1998, suggesting they might have leveraged privileged information. Another study in 2011 by the same researchers showed House members also beat the market, though by a smaller margin—around 6% annually.
The STOCK Act (Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge), signed into law on April 4, 2012, aimed to address this by explicitly prohibiting members of Congress, their staff, and other federal employees from using non-public information gained through their positions for personal financial gain, including stock trading. It also required them to disclose stock transactions over $1,000 within 45 days. However, enforcement has been criticized as weak. The law relies heavily on self-reporting, and penalties are often minimal—late filing fees have been as low as $200, which critics argue lacks deterrence.
Post-STOCK Act, there have still been high-profile cases raising eyebrows. For instance, in 2020, Senators Richard Burr and Kelly Loeffler faced scrutiny for selling millions in stocks after classified briefings on COVID-19, before the market crashed. Investigations followed, but no charges were filed, highlighting how proving intent remains challenging. Data from public disclosures (like those tracked by sites such as Capitol Trades) shows some members continue to outperform the market, fueling debate about whether loopholes persist—like trading through spouses or blind trusts that aren’t truly blind.
So, yes, they’ve profited in the past, and while the STOCK Act tightened rules, its effectiveness is still questioned. The current date is March 31, 2025—any specific recent examples you’re curious about?
Yes! Just think how long it would have taken to look that stuff up! And the additional info was great to find also! Don't be afraid of modern technology!
You seem to confuse thinking with information gathering. You need information before you can think, at least when it comes to many issues. Grok saves the time it would take to gather information, allowing time to think. You definitely have to be aware of the potential bias in information, but when it comes to basis things, like the insider trading info from Grok I posted above, it's pretty great!
So if she ever goes to court for monetary crimes, will she serve a prison sentence or be executed? She'll probably die of old age before she's prosecuted, though.
But it’ can’t be illegal, because she would be arrested if it was , right ? Asking for a elementary school kid !
LOL
The diamonds have to be returned. Remember that time my husband got into a hammer fight with a male prostitute in their bedroom. I cannot recount the times I have had romantic hammer fights with male prostitutes. It's perfectly normal for congressional leaders to have these bedroom antics. You normies don't know how to relax like the elites.
Howls.
Seriously though, what is the point of having all that money if you're never going to retire to enjoy it? It seems like a mental sickness.
She is trying to fill the hole where her soul had been.
The money isn't hers it's her masters. They have to pay to play too. Their bosses get a big cut.
Chasing the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow
Insider trading is theft. Stealing from those trying to invest honestly in the market.
I expect no less from these Demonrats.
Its worse than just cheating. Its manipulating laws to support their personal gains, even when that means passing laws that harm America, or stopping bills that would help Americans.
This is the same thing as sports players betting on their own games - they change the outcome personally because losing is more profitable and easier to accomplish.
From Grok:
Historically, members of Congress have been able to profit from insider trading due to the nature of their positions, which often provide access to non-public, material information about companies, industries, or upcoming legislation that could affect markets. Until 2012, there was no explicit law prohibiting members of Congress or their staff from trading on such information, creating a legal gray area. This issue gained significant attention in the early 2000s. For example, studies like one published in The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (2004) by Ziobrowski et al. found that U.S. senators’ stock trades outperformed the market by about 12% annually between 1993 and 1998, suggesting they might have leveraged privileged information. Another study in 2011 by the same researchers showed House members also beat the market, though by a smaller margin—around 6% annually. The STOCK Act (Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge), signed into law on April 4, 2012, aimed to address this by explicitly prohibiting members of Congress, their staff, and other federal employees from using non-public information gained through their positions for personal financial gain, including stock trading. It also required them to disclose stock transactions over $1,000 within 45 days. However, enforcement has been criticized as weak. The law relies heavily on self-reporting, and penalties are often minimal—late filing fees have been as low as $200, which critics argue lacks deterrence. Post-STOCK Act, there have still been high-profile cases raising eyebrows. For instance, in 2020, Senators Richard Burr and Kelly Loeffler faced scrutiny for selling millions in stocks after classified briefings on COVID-19, before the market crashed. Investigations followed, but no charges were filed, highlighting how proving intent remains challenging. Data from public disclosures (like those tracked by sites such as Capitol Trades) shows some members continue to outperform the market, fueling debate about whether loopholes persist—like trading through spouses or blind trusts that aren’t truly blind. So, yes, they’ve profited in the past, and while the STOCK Act tightened rules, its effectiveness is still questioned. The current date is March 31, 2025—any specific recent examples you’re curious about?
More AI? You seem to worship at its feet and post the books its written for you all over this site
Yes! Just think how long it would have taken to look that stuff up! And the additional info was great to find also! Don't be afraid of modern technology!
Its not fear, its allowing something to think FOR you.
You seem to confuse thinking with information gathering. You need information before you can think, at least when it comes to many issues. Grok saves the time it would take to gather information, allowing time to think. You definitely have to be aware of the potential bias in information, but when it comes to basis things, like the insider trading info from Grok I posted above, it's pretty great!
Oh wow. Grok is great. I don't have any right now but I will ask you later. Thanks.
She comes from a super-corrupt mob family in Baltimore. She had a head start, and she’s a lifer in the rigged system. Nobody should be surprised.
Oh yes, start them young.
Cool, now what
Feed alligators in Everglade?
The People's assets. Yes, ours.
Yep yep.
So if she ever goes to court for monetary crimes, will she serve a prison sentence or be executed? She'll probably die of old age before she's prosecuted, though.
"Can't take it wit you" 😁
Yes, she will drop dead.