Meanwhile, Canada continues trying to get Dr. Makis to shut up about how people can save their own lives with inexpensive, safe, off-label drugs.
https://makismd.substack.com/p/ivermectin-fenbendazole-and-mebendazole-585
STORY:
40s year old UK woman, International Athlete (runner) was diagnosed with a 11cm Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, inoperable.
Was offered palliative chemo only.
In late October 2024, started the Makis Ivermectin Protocol:
Ivermectin 1mg/kg/day increasing to 2mg/kg/day
Fenbendazole 888mg/day, switching to Mebendazole 1500mg/day
Oncologist started Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, Durvalumab
-(See the Substack for the text-images of the correspondence with patient)-
My Take…
Mainstream Oncology has NO ANSWERS for Cholangiocarcinoma.
For most people, I don’t have to explain how amazing this result is.
I believe this is where my work is cracking the foundations of mainstream Oncology.
Cholangiocarcinoma. Pancreatic Cancer. Ovarian Cancer. “incurable”.
The results of Ivermectin, Fenbendazole and Mebendazole with these “incurable cancers” are so dramatic, they leave Oncologists with 30 years experience shaken up and speechless.
This is where the breakthrough will happen.
At some point, there will be an Oncologist at a big Cancer Centre who will want to make a name for himself or herself. They will embrace Ivermectin/Fenben/Meben for use in one of these “incurable cancers” and will treat their adoption of repurposed drugs as something they “just discovered”.
Big pharma is going to put up a big fight but I don’t think they can stop this.
Buddy of mine had stage 4 lung cancer from his time in the marines. Went through chemo and radiation. Was 3/4 through the second round and he felt like it was killing him. He quit. Doc gave him six months to live. He found a fenbendazole and ivermectin protocol and started on that a year and a half ago. Doc can no longer see any cancer.
Doc: I guess our treatment worked.
Yeah, right doc.
He never told the doc because he didn't want to jeopardize his coverage with the VA. Not that it would, he was just wary of running it past them.
Unfortunately, this creates a negative feedback loop and doctors remain uninformed and arrogant.
I think they take an oath to remain uniformed and arrogant/ignorant.
Right? No excuses for doctors no doing a bit of research on these things. The recent (conclusive) and even past studies on cholesterol show that we don’t need statins an we are actually better off without them.
Low fat eating was a scam. Now most are type two diabetic or pre diabetic.
Low fat is bad, 💯%
Low carbs is super bad, 💯 %
Low protein is awful 💯 %
Statins is just as bad as the clot shot. Have you read the side effects? DON'T TAKE STATINS!
Moderation in your diet, don't eat obvious bad things, listen to your body, don't eat crap-tons of food and not expect problems.
Well said.
Meh, they are bound to serve using the standard of care and will reject anything that exists outside that standard of care.
This also applies to RDNs and their nutrition interventions.
He had every right to be concerned about the VA. Hopefully that gets fixed sooner rather than later.
I wonder if it could be (successfully) argued that this cancer treatment would fall under President Trump’s ‘Right to Try’ bill from his first term. 🤔
Yep, don't wanna screw up his access to modern medicine, especially at the VA
Absolutely. The government could screw him so bad if he told.
Nice to hear.
I can understand his reluctance to tell the doctor, but leaving the doctor thinking his treatment worked, and not knowing the fenbendazole and ivermectin protocol was the actual cure, prevents the doctor from learning, questioning, and potentially saving lives.
If you haven't been treated by one of these oncology docs who think they know everything, you might not understand. I have been in such a situation, and they do not WANT to know and will ridicule you up and down once they find out. They will most certainly not start telling other patients to pursue iver/fenben etc, instead, they will dismiss you from care then you can't get your screenings prescribed.
Yes, the Dr's are very matter of fact knowledgeable.
Watched my niece suffer 10 of her 11 years with aggressive brain cancer treatments. Chemo, Focal radiation, puberty blockers, all in the name of "science".
The only thing she could hold down was Sprite (full of cancer feeding sugar). Rotted her teeth away, had several brain surgeries and had a couple strokes that limited her mobility, speech and ability to swallow.
My SIL and BIL did EVERYTHING possible with countless trips to Boston Children's trying to save their first born. She passed away peacefully at home 10+ years ago and our family was never the same.
It enrages me knowing what I now know; and pains me that my SIL & BIL will have to learn that her life could've been spared. They will certainly need counseling when they learn what was in the covid shots they and two other surviving daughters all lined up to get.
Agreed, but that is not the point. That doctor would be obligated to narc on the patient.
It's not movie simple where telling the truth makes it ok to break the rules, and people will then just overlook your error, or somehow it makes it ok.
Didn’t Trump get the right to try bill pushed thru Congress?