The Constitution never intend free men would be ruled to death by nit-picking regulations from a non-elected Administrative State which reaches into every part of our lives and fortunes.
Strange. Nor do I have an X account or want one, but I was able to read the article that the link went to. Maybe try again?
The basic point was to use the judgements already made by the Supreme Court (e.g., the Chevron argument with the ATF) as a basis for summarily deleting all identifiable standing violations of their judgements appearing in agency regulations. Just getting it done without any further ado or legal minuet-dancing.
Oh, thanks, I did manage to see the details at Psiobs's threadreader link.
Maybe it's a browser issue. When I clicked on the X link in this thread's title, it took me to the initial post in the thread, which cuts off after "here's what you need to know..." And clicking on the photo just opened it in a bigger format, without any further text or links.
Roberts and ACB must be sitting in their chambers saying "SOB, how in the world did he outsmart us?". I bet there are chewing the erasers off of pencils trying to figure out how to reopen these cases and proclaim a different outcome so President Trump won't get his way. But, maybe it is too late and the die is cast. The sentence in the article where it said our founding Fathers wanted the elected representatives to be beholden to their constituents was pretty appropo for what we are experiencing today. They form a commission or a new agency and wash their hands of any wrong doing that might happen along the way. "Well, I didn't say we needed to do X, Y, or Z, the new agency did that". Congress critters need to vote something up or down and they must stay in DC in order to get a lot of these types of issues resolved, not spend three weeks our of the month on vacation.
Great news. The only problem is they will just ignore SCOTUS and dare you to sue them. Most don't have unlimited funds to do so. Those that do will get their results in a couple of years when SCOTUS upholds the ruling. But they still just ignore it. There MUST be real consequences to protect our rights. If not, there is no point.
We have to have real protections from tyranny. There has to be some permanence to this entire thing. Judges who ignore the law must be removed. Politicians who ignore the law must be removed. Protections must be put into place to keep this from happening again. At least for awhile.
“In the general course of human nature, A power over a man’s subsistence amounts to a power over his will.” ~ Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury
The Federalist No. 79
“There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.” ~ Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury
The Federalist No. 78.
“The error seems not sufficiently eradicated, that the operations of the mind, as well as the acts of the body, are subject to the coercion of the laws. But our rulers can have authority over such natural rights only as we have submitted to them. The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit. We are answerable for them to our God. The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. ... Was the government to prescribe to us our medicine and diet, our bodies would be in such keeping as our souls are now. Thus in France the emetic was once forbidden as a medicine, and the potatoe as an article of food.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
Jefferson's Notes on Viriginia, Query XVII (1781-1785)
“Freedom is independence of the compulsory will of another, and in so far as it tends to exist with the freedom of all according to a universal law, it is the one sole original inborn right belonging to every man in virtue of his humanity.” ~ Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) German philosopher
“Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution, of course, lays out the delegated, enumerated, and therefore limited powers of Congress. Only through a deliberate misreading of the general welfare and commerce clauses of the Constitution has the federal government been allowed to overreach its authority and extend its tendrils into every corner of civil society.” ~ Edward H. Crane (1944-) American libertarian, co-founder of the Cato Institute
A Constitution of Liberty, Cato Institute 1995 Annual Report
The Constitution never intend free men would be ruled to death by nit-picking regulations from a non-elected Administrative State which reaches into every part of our lives and fortunes.
Corpos have the right to poison the land and rivers so they can make those billions that make us worship them. We need to protect their interests.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1912597129379434819.html
Thank you! The X link didn't give any details.
It’s a thread. It gives all the details.
Apparently not, if you're like me and don't have an X account or wish to log in and get one.
Strange. Nor do I have an X account or want one, but I was able to read the article that the link went to. Maybe try again?
The basic point was to use the judgements already made by the Supreme Court (e.g., the Chevron argument with the ATF) as a basis for summarily deleting all identifiable standing violations of their judgements appearing in agency regulations. Just getting it done without any further ado or legal minuet-dancing.
Oh, thanks, I did manage to see the details at Psiobs's threadreader link.
Maybe it's a browser issue. When I clicked on the X link in this thread's title, it took me to the initial post in the thread, which cuts off after "here's what you need to know..." And clicking on the photo just opened it in a bigger format, without any further text or links.
This should be fun... moar popcorn please!!!
u/#disgonbgud
Roberts and ACB must be sitting in their chambers saying "SOB, how in the world did he outsmart us?". I bet there are chewing the erasers off of pencils trying to figure out how to reopen these cases and proclaim a different outcome so President Trump won't get his way. But, maybe it is too late and the die is cast. The sentence in the article where it said our founding Fathers wanted the elected representatives to be beholden to their constituents was pretty appropo for what we are experiencing today. They form a commission or a new agency and wash their hands of any wrong doing that might happen along the way. "Well, I didn't say we needed to do X, Y, or Z, the new agency did that". Congress critters need to vote something up or down and they must stay in DC in order to get a lot of these types of issues resolved, not spend three weeks our of the month on vacation.
Good thread. Trump knows The Art of the Deal.
This one hits home for me. I know the Sacketts and the expenses and hell they went through.
Great news. The only problem is they will just ignore SCOTUS and dare you to sue them. Most don't have unlimited funds to do so. Those that do will get their results in a couple of years when SCOTUS upholds the ruling. But they still just ignore it. There MUST be real consequences to protect our rights. If not, there is no point.
We have to have real protections from tyranny. There has to be some permanence to this entire thing. Judges who ignore the law must be removed. Politicians who ignore the law must be removed. Protections must be put into place to keep this from happening again. At least for awhile.
I would like some examples of which regulations could be addressed.
Any and all deemed to be unconstitutional by Trump. Read the thread https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1912597129379434819.html
I did. And nothing specific was listed. Read the thread.
“In the general course of human nature, A power over a man’s subsistence amounts to a power over his will.” ~ Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury The Federalist No. 79
“There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.” ~ Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury The Federalist No. 78.
“The error seems not sufficiently eradicated, that the operations of the mind, as well as the acts of the body, are subject to the coercion of the laws. But our rulers can have authority over such natural rights only as we have submitted to them. The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit. We are answerable for them to our God. The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. ... Was the government to prescribe to us our medicine and diet, our bodies would be in such keeping as our souls are now. Thus in France the emetic was once forbidden as a medicine, and the potatoe as an article of food.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President Jefferson's Notes on Viriginia, Query XVII (1781-1785)
“Freedom is independence of the compulsory will of another, and in so far as it tends to exist with the freedom of all according to a universal law, it is the one sole original inborn right belonging to every man in virtue of his humanity.” ~ Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) German philosopher
“Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution, of course, lays out the delegated, enumerated, and therefore limited powers of Congress. Only through a deliberate misreading of the general welfare and commerce clauses of the Constitution has the federal government been allowed to overreach its authority and extend its tendrils into every corner of civil society.” ~ Edward H. Crane (1944-) American libertarian, co-founder of the Cato Institute A Constitution of Liberty, Cato Institute 1995 Annual Report
Believe it when I see it.