Scott Adams announces he has terminal prostate cancer
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (153)
sorted by:
Yes. A while back he put out a bunch of mea culpa videos. Originally he was pro-vax and was critical of those who hesitated/refused. He took the jab. Then he got sick. After soul searching he admitted he was wrong. "Your heuristic - don't trust these guys - worked better than all my data analysis."
I know the type. I have friends who at the outset were all into reading virology and epidemiology papers, parsing the meaning DNA sequences in discussion groups. What they failed to realize is that even in the best of circumstances scientific studies are not a leading indicator but a trailing indicator. The sad part is that for all their university education of "removing hidden thinking biases" they believe they are being rational, and are to a limited extent, but are completely blind to the influence of military-grade state-level propaganda. Misguided, would be a generous way of characterizing being hoodwinked.
Scott Adams had admitted he regrets being fooled.
My issue with Clott Adam’s is that he never admitted that we were right because we knew more, we were right because we were lucky.
He saw it as a 50/50 bet, and that we just happened to guess correctly.
He’s still a dumbfuck.
Agreed. I don't wish harm on him of course - but, he absolutely robbed us of our earned credit by claiming we simply "got lucky" because we stood against the system. So basically saying that none of us dig any actual research or digging, and simply came out on top for blindly going against the MSM. Which is not at all what happened. It was a calculated decision based on real information and analyzed censorship/propaganda + hidden medical data.
This applied to each phase of the Scamdemic as well, not just the clot shot.
I did a lot of reading and research in 2021 (with the help of this board btw for which I am I’m forever grateful for you guys). I had no difficulty finding abundant indicators and evidence that the jab was a fraud from the beginning. I provided all the citations in a letter to HR when my employer was trying to force everyone to get the job by a certain date. My employer was being hard-assed about it, but I got at exemption based on the research. Ninety-five percent of the employees of this 300-person company took the job “as required.” I still can’t understand why people who claim to be “data based” couldn’t see the same thing I saw as clear as a sunny day in high definition. It’s like there was a veil blocking their minds or something.
You’re making me really think back to my reasons for not taking the jab. For me, (I’ve been awake since 1997), I had seen a lot of patterns in the way the Deep State behaves when they’re up to no good. I could just tell they were all acting strangely. They contradicted themselves daily, they changed their minds, and quite frankly, they even looked like they were lying. It seemed like a clown show or a Chinese fire drill to me. The whole thing seemed ridiculous. Plus, some people died right away—an uncle for example—and I was just like—-no way.
Groupthink is a helluva drug!
The wide open eyes on your avatar are well suited for wide awake takes like your comment here.
You don't fight against the narrative floodgates just for the hell of it.
Scott Adams became a multi-millionaire by making fun of large organizations that were inefficient, incompetent, where everyone was greedy and only looked out for their own interests.
His entire schtick was a claim to being good at risk management, and claiming that experts aren't really experts because of unaccounted-for unknowable variables.
His stance on the clot shot was completely against the fabric of everything he was known for. Suddenly, a large organization was entirely competent, nobody in it was greedy, risk management was thrown out the window and it was a fantastic idea to force 7 billion people to take an experimental drug that had no opportunity of being tested properly.
The only way he could pretend that the jab was a good idea is if he was paid -- a lot -- and he probably wasn't paid in cash if you look at how young and pretty his wife was.
The fatal flaw in his plan was that he didn't account for the cabal killing their own sycophants.
Agreed.
Either Scott Adams is putting on an act to play a character that flips the script of the core identity of what he stood for over many decades. Or, he truly underestimated the ability of the deep state to discard anyone even if they are loyal towards them. I guess that makes him unlucky if he isn't putting on an act at this point.
I'm not sure ole Scott wasn't cabal and replaced with an actor. When I look at my old Dilbert cartoons, he seemed WAAAYYY too good at a bit of the satanic folks making fun of normal folks.
And when you consider how Catturd mocks the cabal, it sure seems very similar to how Dogbert mocked the conspiracy theorists. ("think mirror"??)
You're right about that. He did not learn the important lesson. And he did not offer a proper apology. Too much pointy haired boss, not enough Dogbert.
Yup
That's one of the best descriptions of otherwise intelligent normies I think I've ever read. It's so very tragic but also so very true. You wish you could help them but for the type you described it's almost impossible until they are faced with undeniable and tragic consequences and even then, many will refuse to see.
"I'm thankful for having taken the vaccines for if not my [Guillain-Barré Syndrome] would have been even worse."
Emotionally, those statement were like watching a person get out of a car wreck to walk across the highway to be run over by a truck.