Now, now. There are huge swaths of land in red areas yet the vast majority of liberals live in big cities. Austin Texas comes to mind. Texas always has a hard time not electing liberals because of those dense liberal concentrations. Yea, I agree there is whole scale vote cheating going on, but also dense population centers need to be looked at, too.
Sure, but that blue dot has way more population than a huge chunk of the surrounding red sea. I’ll echo the first guy in that I’m perfectly willing to believe there’s some fraud and/or system gaming going on—vote miscounting, gerrymandering, illegal voting, some combination of all of those—but nonetheless, the map doesn’t really represent red voters vastly outnumbering blue voters, even though it might look like it does.
Agreed. But it does lead to the hypothesis that liberalism is an urban mental disorder. And it reminds me of the arguments that Jefferson used to have between the agricultural and the city life. Though I'm a city kid and defend the existence and purpose of cities, I think there is a lot to say for the agricultural life, as it involves the necessity of important virtues.
Yep. But PDJT is going to expose all of those hole and if any one is boring holes in that dike he's gonna arrest them and they get an all expense paid vacation to Gitmo, with hemp rope included as a bonus.
Nobody other than a small percentage of hardcore progressives ever votes left. No one wants their BS. Whatever resources progressives acquire are invested in corrupting the local vote which eventually- when polluted enough- has National effects
Guys, come on. The blue areas have about as much population as the red. They're obviously stealing elections but this boomer tier Facebook shit just makes you look stupid.
What this map shows above all else is that Congress isn't filled with Representatives as envisioned by the Founding Fathers, but rather the political class.
Your Representative should actually represent you as close as possible. That cannot ever happen with only 435 people. Each one "represents" close to million people, which is total bullshit.
1 Representative per 50,000 people, the way it was conceived, and Congress will start working the way it ought to. If it isn't done, Congress remains forever an elite club that represents special interests and lobbying groups.
It might not be THE solution, but it would be a start.
6900 congressmen with no office in Washington without a huge paycheck from the government would mean actual representation of everyone in the legislative branch. You'd still get special interests trying to buy people, but buying 7000 people all over the country and keeping them inline with the central party line is going to be way more difficult.
Especially if they risk getting punched in the face by their angry constituents.
It is 1 per 30k in the Constitution. I don't disagree with anything you said, but the end result would be the same in terms of the ratio of seats because the blue areas have more population.
The question is a valid one! We have all been led to believe that the major cities are where the majority of liberals live! Suppose that is where the systemic corruption is more prevalent and elections can easily be stolen because all branches are corrupt! This would prove why Democrats keep winning in major metropolitan areas that are declining over the last decades! These people will make sure they keep their positions and steal from their constituents regardless of how bad it gets for the voters! Homelessness is a major indicator of massive corruption!
Now, now. There are huge swaths of land in red areas yet the vast majority of liberals live in big cities. Austin Texas comes to mind. Texas always has a hard time not electing liberals because of those dense liberal concentrations. Yea, I agree there is whole scale vote cheating going on, but also dense population centers need to be looked at, too.
I second this. You can't really compare one to the other because one map is based on area and the other is based on population. Low-grade post, IMO.
Austin is that blue dot 🔵 in the center of TX on that map.
Sure, but that blue dot has way more population than a huge chunk of the surrounding red sea. I’ll echo the first guy in that I’m perfectly willing to believe there’s some fraud and/or system gaming going on—vote miscounting, gerrymandering, illegal voting, some combination of all of those—but nonetheless, the map doesn’t really represent red voters vastly outnumbering blue voters, even though it might look like it does.
Agreed. But it does lead to the hypothesis that liberalism is an urban mental disorder. And it reminds me of the arguments that Jefferson used to have between the agricultural and the city life. Though I'm a city kid and defend the existence and purpose of cities, I think there is a lot to say for the agricultural life, as it involves the necessity of important virtues.
"...yet the vast majority of liberals live in big cities."
It's always the cities. Many Red states are like that -- held captive by the deep-blue cities.
Yep. But PDJT is going to expose all of those hole and if any one is boring holes in that dike he's gonna arrest them and they get an all expense paid vacation to Gitmo, with hemp rope included as a bonus.
Nobody other than a small percentage of hardcore progressives ever votes left. No one wants their BS. Whatever resources progressives acquire are invested in corrupting the local vote which eventually- when polluted enough- has National effects
Guys, come on. The blue areas have about as much population as the red. They're obviously stealing elections but this boomer tier Facebook shit just makes you look stupid.
What this map shows above all else is that Congress isn't filled with Representatives as envisioned by the Founding Fathers, but rather the political class.
Your Representative should actually represent you as close as possible. That cannot ever happen with only 435 people. Each one "represents" close to million people, which is total bullshit.
1 Representative per 50,000 people, the way it was conceived, and Congress will start working the way it ought to. If it isn't done, Congress remains forever an elite club that represents special interests and lobbying groups.
6900 congressmen?
Seems legit.
Does create another problem of giving the senate a lot more power. Maybe we should think outside the box a bit more on this?
It might not be THE solution, but it would be a start.
6900 congressmen with no office in Washington without a huge paycheck from the government would mean actual representation of everyone in the legislative branch. You'd still get special interests trying to buy people, but buying 7000 people all over the country and keeping them inline with the central party line is going to be way more difficult.
Especially if they risk getting punched in the face by their angry constituents.
BINGO!
It is 1 per 30k in the Constitution. I don't disagree with anything you said, but the end result would be the same in terms of the ratio of seats because the blue areas have more population.
XLNT image.
Because some of those blue dots are among the most heavily populated communist enclaves on earth.
AIPAC
The question is a valid one! We have all been led to believe that the major cities are where the majority of liberals live! Suppose that is where the systemic corruption is more prevalent and elections can easily be stolen because all branches are corrupt! This would prove why Democrats keep winning in major metropolitan areas that are declining over the last decades! These people will make sure they keep their positions and steal from their constituents regardless of how bad it gets for the voters! Homelessness is a major indicator of massive corruption!
Exactly.
Once that is properly answered-only then can the USA start coming back together.