Pahlavi is making his move now. We'll see if the regime actually does get overthrown. I think the citizens of Iran would be happier under him than the current regime.
Did you READ the article? Pahlavi states rather clearly that:
"Despite calls for his leadership, Pahlavi made clear that he does not seek political power or a return to monarchy, but aims to guide Iranโs transition to a secular, democratic government."
Kings arenโt necessarily bad. Some civilizations just arenโt as advanced as America/Europe, so democracy or republicanism tends to fail. Though Iran may do well with a Republic system, who knows
Don't be naive. The infected countries couldn't care less about how Iran is running itself. The only thing that matters is stopping Iran's proactive anti-zionism. That's why Iran has been the target of all sorts of warfare for decades. That is the ONLY reason.
Unfortunately, proactive anti-zionism is forcefully squashed. See: Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia, Sudan, and Iraq. Amongst others.
My point was that Zionists (and ZOGs) don't give two shits about how Iran runs itself, as long as it doesn't stand in the way of the Greater Israel project.
The prince states he does not wish to rule but to assist them in getting whatever system they wish in place. Do I believe him? I don't know enough about him tbh. But I'd think anything is better than what they currently live under.
The most interesting part was that he is receiving back-channel appeals from elements of the military who would want this development. And is making arrangements to facilitate more such contact.
1953: US-backed coup removes Mossadegh; Western consortium takes control of Iran's oil.
1963: Khomeini emerges as a critic of the Shah's regime and Western influence, expressing anti-Zionist views.
1979: Islamic Revolution overthrows the Shah, whose violent security apparatus was trained by the CIA and Israeli Mossad. US Embassy, heavily used by the CIA, is overrun, with 52 Americans held hostage for 444 days.
1980: Iraq, backed by the US, UK, USSR, France, and Germany, invades Iran; Iraq uses chemical weapons, including mustard gas and nerve agents, supplied by Western countries, including Germany, and with support from Western countries, including military intelligence, technology, and financing.
1980: Hostage release negotiations lead to the Algiers Accords; hostages are released on January 20, 1981.
1982: Iran begins supporting Hezbollah in Lebanon, a key anti-Zionist militant group.
1984: US launches economic coercion campaign against Iran due to its anti-Zionist stance.
1987-1988: US and Iran engage in naval conflicts in the Persian Gulf, known as the Tanker War; a ceasefire is brokered on July 20, 1988.
1988: Iran accepts UN-brokered ceasefire with Iraq on August 20, ending the Iran-Iraq War. On July 3, Iran Air Flight 655 is shot down by a US Navy warship, killing 290 people.
1990s-present: Iran faces repeated assassination attempts, sabotage, and cyber attacks allegedly linked to Western and Israeli intelligence agencies.
2000s-present: Iran continues to support anti-Zionist militant groups, including Hezbollah and Hamas, in their resistance against Israeli occupation.
2015: Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA) signed.
2018: US withdraws from JCPOA, reimposing crippling economic sanctions.
2020: US drone strike assassinates Soleimani, a key figure in Iran's support for anti-Zionist militant groups.
Pahlavi is making his move now. We'll see if the regime actually does get overthrown. I think the citizens of Iran would be happier under him than the current regime.
He is not very popular given his pro Israel views.
But with whom? The Iranian people or the leadership?
Americans donโt like Israel either. Its just that Jeffrey Epstein compromised and blackmailed our politicians
Both
I think most people would be surprised at how prosperous Iran would be if the U.S./West were not sanctioning the shit out of Iran economically.
He wouldn't last an hour in the streets of Tehran.
On a side note: ironic how the American Patriots didn't want to be ruled by a king.. but are now allegedly wanting to install one elsewhere.
Did you READ the article? Pahlavi states rather clearly that:
"Despite calls for his leadership, Pahlavi made clear that he does not seek political power or a return to monarchy, but aims to guide Iranโs transition to a secular, democratic government."
It's the same on X. Always have that one who gonna go on a rant yet you READ and the rant makes zero sense. Did they stop teaching people to read?
Yes, they did stop teaching people to read.
Apparently - and reading comprehension is on a serious decline as well.
Kings arenโt necessarily bad. Some civilizations just arenโt as advanced as America/Europe, so democracy or republicanism tends to fail. Though Iran may do well with a Republic system, who knows
Don't be naive. The infected countries couldn't care less about how Iran is running itself. The only thing that matters is stopping Iran's proactive anti-zionism. That's why Iran has been the target of all sorts of warfare for decades. That is the ONLY reason.
whats wrong with anti zionism?
Unfortunately, proactive anti-zionism is forcefully squashed. See: Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia, Sudan, and Iraq. Amongst others.
My point was that Zionists (and ZOGs) don't give two shits about how Iran runs itself, as long as it doesn't stand in the way of the Greater Israel project.
He's just another zionist puppet which is why Israel is trying so hard to get him installed.
Israel is the one that needs regime change the most.
For sure, and then they can rebuild their country!
Tetartos_Ippeas, I love your formatting for these excellent posts.
I've been formatting my longer posts for years, but your style is more readable; very well done.
I'll be using it, or some version of it, for some of my own posts going forward.
I hope others will as well; the unadorned wall-of-text style is damned annoying on longer texts.
The prince states he does not wish to rule but to assist them in getting whatever system they wish in place. Do I believe him? I don't know enough about him tbh. But I'd think anything is better than what they currently live under.
We may not agree with whatever form of govt the Iranians decide on. But we don't have to be happy with it. They do.
The most interesting part was that he is receiving back-channel appeals from elements of the military who would want this development. And is making arrangements to facilitate more such contact.
He is the Crown Prince! Iran needs a constitutional monarchy!!!!
FYI
"A Century of Intervention: US-Iran Relations, Oil, and the Price of Anti-Zionism"
Always keep in mind that Shah was as much a CIA/MOS asset as Atatullahs
Donโt get confused by the Hegelian Dialectic