Kinda got started on this because I wanted to make a well researched and well sourced series of posts about why dispensationalism and Christian Zionism is heresy. Proven by scripture, early church fathers, Catholic, Orthodox and Mainline Protestant theologians alike. So I started really looking into how Christianity got infiltrated by the cabal.
I am reading Dr. Taylor Marshall’s book Infiltration about how the Catholic Church was infiltrated by Freemasons, Modernists, Zionists and Marxists set out to destroy it from within. Great read whether you are Catholic or not.
Anyways the Scofield Bible and Scofield’s connection to Zionists has been discussed on this board before. And how Zionists used Scofield and seminaries like the Dallas Bible Seminary to get American Protestants to be sympathetic towards Israel.
Some other examples I thought I read on here or maybe it was Instagram or YouTube that Protestant seminaries also got infiltrated which is why you see all the LGBTQ blasphemy in some Anglican, Lutheran and other Protestant churches.
So anyways if you have material relating to this topic I would love to read it or watch it.
To me it’s clear that Jesus and Christianity are the enemy of the cabal. We are in a spiritual war and the cabal is a satanic force that has been working tirelessly to subvert and destroy Christianity.
Yes there are satanic peoples who pretend to be Christian. Hussein’s an example
Yeah he is a clear example. I am more talking about infiltration at the institutional level.
Like Archbishop Vingano implied about Pope Francis being an infiltrator and was excommunicated for it.
The recent takeover of the United Methodist Church might be a good case study.
Not because it's historic, but because ample documentation exists of a recent infiltration. Just a few years ago the UMC was the largest denomination in the U.S., and had long-standing codified rules against homosexuals in the ministry. The story of how it flipped really opened my eyes to the organized strategies and tactics used. And it made me appreciate how it was the same thing they did to the Lutherans a decade or so prior. Today they're brazenly sending out thought police to "audit" the ministries of traditional pastors, replacing them with gay advocates to scare away members and eventually steal the souls of the gullible while simultaneously stealing the real estate of parishes around the country.
Although it's not what you asked for, the study and the fact that its well-documented on the internet might make it easier to identify tactics from years past.
They had already installed sodomite pastors in the mid-80’s.
Is there a good write-up on what they did?
There are lots of them, but you have to look. I didn't save them, but editorials in the UMC's internal newsletters are a good start. The UMC "book of discipline" and news articles referencing UMC schism would be good phrases to search.
As general tactics, they infiltrated and played for delayed enforcement, using the "ok, won't do it again" later openly defied enforcement, made signed agreements to enforce the discipline, broke them, and on and on ... Not to mention sit-ins, parliamentarian BS, quorum breaking, and other assorted strategic chaos. A good microcosm of commie tactics.
🤬
About what, positions and techniques? 😬😁🤣
u/#kek
It goes back further than Wescott and Hort:
https://greatawakening.win/p/19Bst3zBdl/x/c/4eVKTmbkjgq (see comment)
Black Nobility would be a good supplimental study:
https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1kApOWD/the-black-nobility/c/
https://greatawakening.win/p/1995LlFT0b/in-line-with-the-vatican-owning-/c/ (see comment)
https://greatawakening.win/p/199OdIIhp3/moar-black-nobility--the-shadow-/c/
As to the Roman church being infiltrated, it's been corrupt since Constantine's day, more or less, depending on who occupied its thrones. As you will see from the comment in that first link, the Scofield Bible, Dispensationalism, and Christian Zionism all trace their roots back to the Jesuit Order and Counter-Reformation.
Brave AI:
Q: how futurism inspired christian zionism
Wikipedia:
During the Reformation, historicism was the dominant view.[7] All, or nearly all of the reformers saw the pope as Antichrist.[8] Futurism emerged after this time as a Roman Catholic response to historicism.[9] This rise of futurism is generally associated with a Jesuit priest named Francisco Ribera (1537–1591).[10] Ribera is said to have developed his scheme for the purpose of refuting historicism and its papal antichrist.[11] A scheme similar to Ribera's was put forward by Italian archbishop Robert Bellarmine (1542-1621).[10]
Another Jesuit, Manuel Lacunza (1731–1801), wrote in favor of futurism under the pen name "Ben-Ezra", and his work was banned by the Catholic Church. Until the 19th century, the futurist view was generally shunned by non-Catholics, being seen as a self-defense of the papacy against the claims of the historicist reformers.[12]
The futurist view entered Protestant circles around 1827 through Samuel R. Maitland, librarian to the Archbishop of Canterbury.[13] It began to expand into Protestantism in the 1800s through the teachings of John Nelson Darby and dispensationalism.[14] Futurism has grown in popularity in the 19th and 20th centuries, and is currently followed by millions of Christians.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futurism_(Christianity)
Point in fact: The Jesuit Order and Catholic church are responsible for Christian Zionism.
edit- and as usual a residential coward downvotes my information because it's the truth and they don't have any argument against it. Consensus shill, repent!
Recently stumbled upon the story of Hypatia of Alexandria while researching a similar topic to this.
People love to say Scofield was some Zionist plant, but there’s really no evidence for that. He didn’t invent dispensationalism anyway... Darby and the Brethren had been teaching it looong before him, and the early church fathers like Irenaeus were already talking about a future earthly reign and Israel’s restoration centuries earlier. Scofield just popularized it. If folks want to argue against dispensationalism, cool, but trying to make it out like some cabal infiltration is just weak.
Long story short basically the story goes that Sam Untermeyer a Zionists lawyer who helped establish the IRS funded Scofield and had influence with the Oxford press and the Lotus Club an elite literally and social club in NYC. And how could a former drunkard embezzler get the funding for his reference bible without backing and how could someone like him gain access to this club without backing.
I am running errands right now but that’s the gist of it.
Yeah I’ve read those claims about Untermeyer and Scofield too (been thrown around in here a littlebit), but the problem is there’s never been hard evidence connecting the two. It’s mostly built on speculation and repeating the same story around the internet. Scofield definitly had a messy past (no argument there), but that’s not unusual for guys God still ends up using - look at Augustine, Luther, or even Paul’s history for crying out loud.
As for Oxford Press, they published TONS of different study Bibles and works, not just Scofield’s. So access to a publisher doesn’t prove some "Zionist cabal pulling strings." And elite clubs in NYC? That sounds dramatic, but again, I haven’t seen anything verifiable showing that Scofield’s theology was crafted as propaganda.
At the end of the day, if the theology stands or falls, it should be on Scripture... not on whether Scofield had rich friends. Otherwise we’re just chasing conspiracies instead of actually testing doctrine by the Word.
To my perception, the Catholic Church is also dispensationalist, even while frequently decrying it as a “Protestant heresy”. Clearly, there are different meanings to the words, which makes communication based around them quite impossible, and using more of them (-ist, -ism, -it’s, etc) many times more miscommunicative. Clarity is good, so describing things mechanically with simple words (which few if any formally “religious” words are) is a good thing (says the person who just used 15 8+ letter words in 3 sentences).
I was originally gonna post this, which strikes me as comedic gold.. or at least bronze. Better than plastic, at any rate. Enjoy!
Can you do a solid here and define some terms:
It would appear you’re Catholic also, correct?
https://www.youtube.com/live/KaYYn9JzThQ?si=MyBBeiknvpG2Ltdf
I am helping my father in law build a shed right now but Dr. Taylor Marshall explains it well he is also the author of Infiltration about how the Catholic Church got infiltrated by Marxists, free masons etc.
So I have been reading about Catholicism, Orthodoxy and Protestantism for two years now. I lean Catholic because of the teachings but I recognize that the Catholic Church has a deep state as well. Zionists, Marxists, Freemasons and other enemies of Christ have infiltrated the church.
But when it comes to Christian Zionism and dispensationalism Catholics, Orthodox and Mainline Protestants had relatively the same belief about Jews until John Darby came about. Jews needed to repent and accept Christ. This was a belief held by St Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, Martin Luther and John Calvin alike.
I’m watching the video, but can already say that the whole setup strikes me as Hegelian. “You’re either a Dispensationalist or Covenant Theologian”.
Both concepts have multiple ideas bound up in them, where some seem correct in each and some seem incorrect in each.
Funny how that works. Really not a fan of -isms at this point. Ted Cruz’s argument is definitely really bad though.
The work of the pioneering and intellectually brilliant Constance Cumbey (1944-2025), a Michigan attorney who wrote "Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow" and "A Planned Deception," is foundational IMO.
Cumbey explains how monotheism is the enemy of the cabal, why this is the case, and how they planned to destroy it and replace it with a One World Government and One World Religion (sound familiar?). And the crazy thing is, she figured all this stuff out before the internet.
Her testimony of single-handledly shutting down an appearance by Benjamin Creme in 1982 by uttering "The Lord's Prayer" in a room full of Stupid White Hippies is one of the most powerful things I ever heard that altered irrevocably my understanding of spiritual warfare (it's somewhere on Youtube but I am not sure where):
https://cumbey.blogspot.com/2012/04/
Dorothy Margraf (RIP), a colleague of Cumbey's, switched me onto Rabbi Marvin Antelman's book "To Eliminate the Opiate" about the Sabbatean Frankists, and "The Rainbow Swastika" by Hannah Newman (which is free online and not very long - link below), both of which taken together seriously un-mushed my brain. Although Icke has talked about the Sabbatean Frankists and seems to know a lot, it's a very deep rabbit hole that even the most meticulous truthers seem to miss.
https://www.lermanet.com/rainbow-swaztika.html
NB: The Antelman and Newman books deal with Judaism and you asked about Christianity, but IMO you cannot separate the two infiltrations, you need to understand both.
This is a great topic and I have learned a great deal by watching Dave Curtis with the Berean Bible Church on YouTube.