BREAKING: The Trump DOJ just released the transcripts and audio of their interview with Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell. GET. THE FVCK. IN HERE!!!!
(unusualwhales.com)
🧐 ELITE Researchers 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (70)
sorted by:
Here’s the core takeaways — the parts of Maxwell’s DOJ interview that actually matter, boiled down to the most important and interesting points:
She calls him “cordial,” “very kind,” “a gentleman in all respects.”
Denies flatly: “Never,” “Absolutely never,” when asked if he was inappropriate.
No hedging, no memory gaps. She goes airtight here — which means she chose to shield him deliberately.
Quote: “There is no list.”
Says the myth started with lawyers (Brad Edwards, Rothstein firm) and Epstein’s butler’s notes.
Calls it a “Salem witch trial.”
She doesn’t just deny names — she destroys the entire idea of a list. That move protects everyone rumored to be on one.
On recruiting at Mar-a-Lago: “I do not remember ever doing that… it’s in the realms of possibility.”
Interesting because she hedges — unlike with Trump. She knows recruitment exposure is dangerous, so she leaves wiggle room.
Claims transfers were for legit business: helicopter sales, real estate flips, collectible cars, trading profits.
Says “Epstein’s accountants controlled the accounts.”
Translation: reframes millions as business, not payoffs for trafficking.
Quote: “If it wasn’t suicide, it could have been arranged internally.”
Dismisses “wild conspiracies” but keeps suspicion alive.
This keeps her credible while hinting at foul play within the system.
“No one ever sought me out since the inception of the case.”
“I have been offering to speak for years.”
Positions herself as the ignored truth-teller, persecuted by hysteria.
Bottom Line
Trump: Gets airtight protection.
List: She kills the entire concept, shielding everyone.
Memory: Firm where safe, hedged where risky.
Money: Recast as business.
Death: Leaves a breadcrumb — inside job possible.
Self: Casts herself as the victim of a witch hunt.
This reads like a chatgpt recap
Even if it was it's not a bad thing.
Never said it was bad, just that it reads like AI
It was all gpt5
Correct
Great summary. I haven't read or listened to it all yet (it's long / a lot). But one other key takeaway I found:
The interviewer asked point blank if she (Maxwell) ever heard Epstein say that he's been in contact with the FB1 or is working with the FB1. I think this is interesting question bc a lot of anons have speculated that Epstein may have been an informant (or turned, in addition to being a scumbag) to collect info, video etc on some of the sleazeball participants to implicate them.
Maxwell responds very confidently "No. He (Epstein) was a bragger and he would've told me if he was working with/for the FB1."
Her believability is definitely worth questioning. But I found this interesting. If she's honest in this answer, then Epstein wasn't flipped to work with the FB1 to implicate others.
i haven't listened to this - but why didn't the follow up question ask if she were working with fB to implicate others?
Well...she didn't implicate others? If she didn't, how can the question be asked?
great question.
idk
hmm. If this is true then it reduces The credibility of any rumors that Epstein was disappeared into a witness protection program
Her protecting Trump wouldn't mean anything really. The dems will say she is just doing that because she is angling for a pardon. And of course she would say she is an innocent victim of a witch hunt. Also, wasn't their dvds with peoples names on them taken from Epsteins properties? It may not be a "list" per se but...
She also chose to shield the Clintons just as strongly. “He never. Absolutely never went. And I can be sure of that because there’s no way he would’ve gone – I don’t believe there’s any way that he would’ve gone to the island, had I not been there. Because I don’t believe he had an independent friendship, if you will, with Epstein...He was a rich guy with a plane." She specifically said Hillary had no dealings with Epstein either.
This interview basically just shattered the list narrative. We can't just pick and choose the parts we want to hear.
Yea, this just destroys any sort of reliability of her testimony. Shielding the Clintons is retarded. She shouldn't have said anything about them if this was the case.
This is unreliable testimony. Means nothing now.
Or she wants to live....
If that's the reason then we can't trust anything she's saying anyway and this interview gives us nothing. That was always the risk, that we give her credibility and it backfires when she lies. Regardless, we now have new official testimony on record that states that Trump and the Clintons are innocent. If the DOJ wants to pursue, it's another hurdle they have to jump over for either party. They would have to discredit her first
If the past few years have taught us anything it is that the Left convinces itself of a story then holds itself to that party line...
If the inter viewers did not press the right points or ask the right questions then she may very well have flossed over the legitimate deals bit..
If you (the interviewer) don't comprehend that $5million is play money to many of these people then you will never understand friend pricing...
I wonder if she is being told to use the playbook we use; shield trump so that dems/naysayers can say, “see! He’s complicit, he’s a part of it, why is she protecting him?”
I've always thought this was an unnecessary "hail mary" if they already had enough info about who was guilty. She has perjured herself multiple times and is an obvious manipulator, and we're giving her credibility? Seems obvious that this is what she was going to try to do, say she's innocent and that no one powerful is implicated.
It would be the same thing with releasing the court records, where there were only 2 victim testimonies anyway - better than nothing (and they still should) but that was never going to be a bombshell either or implicate anyone big like the Clintons (who she exonerated anyway, so I doubt the case even implicated them) or some massive network.
Either Trump is telling the truth and we really don't have any kind of list or definitive proof right now, or someone inside the admin is really trying to spike this thing.
That’s how you know the entire thing is bullshit
Of course she said Clintons weren't an issue. She knows like the rest of us how many got arkancided.
Yeah I was always against them giving her a platform to begin with because I knew she would absolve everyone of wrongdoing and paint herself as completely innocent. They shouldn't have announced they were gonna interview her if it was just gonna lead to this nonsense. Now the Clintons and Trump have the same alibi. Yuck, feels so dirty.
Regarding Point No. 4: Real estate sales, helicopter sales etc.
Legitimate business (in appearance) But when dealing with thinly traded/highly unique asset sales there is a of comps (comparables)
This makes it easy to add a few hundred thousand, or millions to the agreed upon price to cover bonus features. Buyer offers 15 million, Jeffrey responds: