I knew a stripper that called herself Destiny. She learned the hard way about that profession. She eventually found Christ and turned her life around.
Some sick people that knew her back then mock her over her previous life and claim she was better off back then. She takes it all in stride ... Pisses them off even more.
Christianity does not need to accept evil within it's ranks, all it does is make us look like a dumping ground for degenerates. we need strong gatekeeping
People are their past, what she has done is turned an innocent desperate man into an unwilling cuckold while also having permanently wasted her youth which should have been used pumping out healthy babies rather than the tard babies that come from old women in their late 20s and 30s.
So yes, she does still deserve to be judged harshly. Forgiveness that absolves all past evil only incentivizes evil acts in the future.
Forgiveness is for God to handle, damage caused by sin is long lasting and goes on far longer than the act itself. Do you think murderers should be forgiven by society entirely if they repent?
Forgiveness not only absolves past evil, but present and future. That is how salvation works. When it comes to crimes that break the law, however, there are consequences, and it’s up to the courts and the law to determine what is the fitting punishment.
Does your comment suggest also that judgment and discipline should be meted out on people who join a local congregation? For example, if someone shares their testimony of conversion and is seeking membership to join a church, do you have any basis for suggesting that church should punish her for her sins? What about church discipline? For past sins prior to joining?
When it comes to crimes that break the law, however, there are consequences, and it’s up to the courts and the law to determine what is the fitting punishment.
Retarded, when the law protects evil and criminalizes justice then why should I allow it to be the sole method of earthly punishment? The law is clearly evil so it is no up to the common man to punish evil doers such as sluts, prostitutes, and underage sexhavers
Along this logic I would argue that society also need not accept ignorant, baseless, sycophant and judgemental fucktards like you. Take your holier than thou complex and shove it up your ........ actually your a 3 to 5 percent forget it too far gone.
Mr. Musk is on the right track, although I think the penalty for this kind of thing should be more severe. I've seen clips of this Destiny fellow talking and he's very dangerous. He should get locked away for life without the possibility of parole.
This might seem like I am over reacting BUT if life has taught me nothing else -- people like that who encourage others to participate in evil things always seem to have skeletons in their closet. I'd bet if an investigator was put on this dude's tail they'd discover he has some interesting "friends". In fact, if they aren't watching this Destiny guy -- they should be!
I think anyone promoting terrorism, sedition, treason is falling under Devolution, MIL laws and orders, and will all be part of a RICO type takedown event. It’s a completely different ballgame they are unaware of. They have been lulled into committing these crimes/acts due to Sleepys fake residency and have no idea the nuke that will drop on their heads.
He should be very careful. At the least, there could be very good men who will take his threat seriously and not be afraid to get him before he causes them to lose a family member. We are at that point that men will start taking the law into their own hands if the government won't stop these sick demons.
Well, to be fair... Massa Des-tiny, their is no ambiguity in your statement. At a minimum, you are advocating intense fear... but caused by what Mr, Des-tiny, Sir?
I deleted a comment I was about to post here trying to work through, in my mind, how following through on this would be a conflict between our 1st amendment and what type of pandoras box would be opened if this type of suggestion had follow through. Then I realized, that applies to American citizens that are patriots of this nation. This is no longer a nation we live in where everyone has equal rights because everyone here, I feel, is no longer part of the same nation. He is the enemy at this point, and they should be classified as such along with everyone else that's plotting and cheering for murder to those who disagree.
Yeah, I think this is the exception to the freedom of speech right here. Specifically calling out to kill a certain person or type of person. He wasn't saying it rhetorically like sometimes people say "I would kill him" but he is clearly giving out a motive to kill certain people. Yes I do think this is the exception to free speech which is not allowed. He needs to serve time.
I suppose if he earnestly recanted it immediately after he said it, he could get a break because sometimes people say dumb stuff without thinking but he clearly did not, rather he kept saying it over & over.
I agree with you. you can shout all day long things that are untrue and racist and lie and all that but when you're inciting violence it is not protected. chatGPTs response is:
The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition — but not all speech is protected. U.S. courts have ruled that certain types of speech are not protected under the First Amendment. These include:
Incitement to imminent lawless action (speech intended and likely to provoke immediate violence or illegal acts).
True threats (serious expressions of intent to commit violence).
Obscenity (very strictly defined, e.g., hard-core sexual content with no serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value).
Child pornography (always illegal to create, possess, or distribute).
Defamation (libel or slander — false statements that harm someone’s reputation).
Fraud (lying for personal or financial gain).
Speech integral to criminal conduct (like soliciting a crime, blackmail, or conspiracy).
Fighting words (direct, face-to-face insults meant to provoke immediate violence — though this category is very narrow today).
👉 Everything else — even highly offensive, unpopular, or hateful opinions — is generally protected unless it falls into one of those exceptions.
I discovered him when watching a Jubilee debate episode on YouTube. he's not stupid. but definitely seduced by satan. does every drug under the sun, is bisexual etc
I think making threats, actively promoting terrorism, telling people to kill other people, or to riot or perform any act of violence is not "free speech". Being a cheerleader for Satan is just not free speech. BUT - I am worried about the repercussions of making it a felony...
disagree. I feel this is protected under the 1st amendment unless it incites violence
Then we need to rethink the first amendment. Obviously, it is being abused to lead to the moral degradation of our country. We really need to interpret this in its original context. Free speech refers to speech. Posting text or a video online isn't speech, it is a recording. Only when someone is talking in person, should that be protected by the first amendment. This also helps create self-regulation. People are less likely to say stupid things in person. We need to remove the ability for people to post their opinions anonymously from their basements. If you have something to say, you should say it in public, otherwise, keep it to yourself.
And he chose his name…destiny…like a girl…
I knew a stripper that called herself Destiny. She learned the hard way about that profession. She eventually found Christ and turned her life around.
Some sick people that knew her back then mock her over her previous life and claim she was better off back then. She takes it all in stride ... Pisses them off even more.
Christianity does not need to accept evil within it's ranks, all it does is make us look like a dumping ground for degenerates. we need strong gatekeeping
She's evil for leaving the stripper life and turning her life around?
People are their past, what she has done is turned an innocent desperate man into an unwilling cuckold while also having permanently wasted her youth which should have been used pumping out healthy babies rather than the tard babies that come from old women in their late 20s and 30s.
So yes, she does still deserve to be judged harshly. Forgiveness that absolves all past evil only incentivizes evil acts in the future.
Forgiveness is for God to handle, damage caused by sin is long lasting and goes on far longer than the act itself. Do you think murderers should be forgiven by society entirely if they repent?
You trolls need to try harder. You're becoming way too obvious.
Forgiveness not only absolves past evil, but present and future. That is how salvation works. When it comes to crimes that break the law, however, there are consequences, and it’s up to the courts and the law to determine what is the fitting punishment.
Does your comment suggest also that judgment and discipline should be meted out on people who join a local congregation? For example, if someone shares their testimony of conversion and is seeking membership to join a church, do you have any basis for suggesting that church should punish her for her sins? What about church discipline? For past sins prior to joining?
Retarded, when the law protects evil and criminalizes justice then why should I allow it to be the sole method of earthly punishment? The law is clearly evil so it is no up to the common man to punish evil doers such as sluts, prostitutes, and underage sexhavers
So you basically know nothing at all about the Gospel of Christ.
Along this logic I would argue that society also need not accept ignorant, baseless, sycophant and judgemental fucktards like you. Take your holier than thou complex and shove it up your ........ actually your a 3 to 5 percent forget it too far gone.
Absolutely.
As least my stripper name is chastity. Jeez :p
In prison he will be known as “Ms. Utility”
Lol…
Destiny’s Child🫃🏻
Mr. Musk is on the right track, although I think the penalty for this kind of thing should be more severe. I've seen clips of this Destiny fellow talking and he's very dangerous. He should get locked away for life without the possibility of parole.
This might seem like I am over reacting BUT if life has taught me nothing else -- people like that who encourage others to participate in evil things always seem to have skeletons in their closet. I'd bet if an investigator was put on this dude's tail they'd discover he has some interesting "friends". In fact, if they aren't watching this Destiny guy -- they should be!
I think anyone promoting terrorism, sedition, treason is falling under Devolution, MIL laws and orders, and will all be part of a RICO type takedown event. It’s a completely different ballgame they are unaware of. They have been lulled into committing these crimes/acts due to Sleepys fake residency and have no idea the nuke that will drop on their heads.
He should be very careful. At the least, there could be very good men who will take his threat seriously and not be afraid to get him before he causes them to lose a family member. We are at that point that men will start taking the law into their own hands if the government won't stop these sick demons.
Dark alley or deserted street. S.S.S.
Always remember to not violate the third S which is what most fuck up.
This makes me think the storm has to come very soon. No one is going to put up with this shit any longer. Q promised no civil war.
I dont think that is far fetched. The guy is inciting murder against Christians.
Well, to be fair... Massa Des-tiny, their is no ambiguity in your statement. At a minimum, you are advocating intense fear... but caused by what Mr, Des-tiny, Sir?
He must be doing every drug under the sun, too. Seduced by Satan 100%
I deleted a comment I was about to post here trying to work through, in my mind, how following through on this would be a conflict between our 1st amendment and what type of pandoras box would be opened if this type of suggestion had follow through. Then I realized, that applies to American citizens that are patriots of this nation. This is no longer a nation we live in where everyone has equal rights because everyone here, I feel, is no longer part of the same nation. He is the enemy at this point, and they should be classified as such along with everyone else that's plotting and cheering for murder to those who disagree.
Yeah, I think this is the exception to the freedom of speech right here. Specifically calling out to kill a certain person or type of person. He wasn't saying it rhetorically like sometimes people say "I would kill him" but he is clearly giving out a motive to kill certain people. Yes I do think this is the exception to free speech which is not allowed. He needs to serve time.
I suppose if he earnestly recanted it immediately after he said it, he could get a break because sometimes people say dumb stuff without thinking but he clearly did not, rather he kept saying it over & over.
I agree with you. you can shout all day long things that are untrue and racist and lie and all that but when you're inciting violence it is not protected. chatGPTs response is:
The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition — but not all speech is protected. U.S. courts have ruled that certain types of speech are not protected under the First Amendment. These include:
Incitement to imminent lawless action (speech intended and likely to provoke immediate violence or illegal acts).
True threats (serious expressions of intent to commit violence).
Obscenity (very strictly defined, e.g., hard-core sexual content with no serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value).
Child pornography (always illegal to create, possess, or distribute).
Defamation (libel or slander — false statements that harm someone’s reputation).
Fraud (lying for personal or financial gain).
Speech integral to criminal conduct (like soliciting a crime, blackmail, or conspiracy).
Fighting words (direct, face-to-face insults meant to provoke immediate violence — though this category is very narrow today).
👉 Everything else — even highly offensive, unpopular, or hateful opinions — is generally protected unless it falls into one of those exceptions.
Never heard of the guy.
I discovered him when watching a Jubilee debate episode on YouTube. he's not stupid. but definitely seduced by satan. does every drug under the sun, is bisexual etc
I think making threats, actively promoting terrorism, telling people to kill other people, or to riot or perform any act of violence is not "free speech". Being a cheerleader for Satan is just not free speech. BUT - I am worried about the repercussions of making it a felony...
I disagree. I feel this is protected under the 1st amendment unless it incites violence
I can't play this out...what do you see in the future if this is a thing?
Then we need to rethink the first amendment. Obviously, it is being abused to lead to the moral degradation of our country. We really need to interpret this in its original context. Free speech refers to speech. Posting text or a video online isn't speech, it is a recording. Only when someone is talking in person, should that be protected by the first amendment. This also helps create self-regulation. People are less likely to say stupid things in person. We need to remove the ability for people to post their opinions anonymously from their basements. If you have something to say, you should say it in public, otherwise, keep it to yourself.
That's extreme. You're trying to be the thought police imo
Completely agree.