For this one it kind of makes sense. The 5 year statue of limitations ends in like a week or so? Meaning based on that alone either the DOJ indicts or lets him walk for lying to congress.
Other charges like treason which have no statue of limitations could be levied at any time, but obviously much harder to prove. I know we have it ALL tho
I hope someone is still going to indict him for inciting political violence. His 86-47 is even more troubling in light of the rash of political violence from his side.
Why is national news allowed to talk about an "indictment" that hasn't happened yet and is a "fluid" situation?
For this one it kind of makes sense. The 5 year statue of limitations ends in like a week or so? Meaning based on that alone either the DOJ indicts or lets him walk for lying to congress.
Other charges like treason which have no statue of limitations could be levied at any time, but obviously much harder to prove. I know we have it ALL tho
I hope someone is still going to indict him for inciting political violence. His 86-47 is even more troubling in light of the rash of political violence from his side.
So. Theyβre indicting him on lying to Congress? Really?
Yeah, are they going to indict everyone else who did this?
Indictments are not arrests.
A famous quote is "you could indict a ham sandwich'' :)
https://i.imgur.com/j1GwVIr.jpeg
Will this be for just lying to Congress? Was hoping for much more.
This would be a step in the right direction. Then get the rest of them charged and tried.
Ok.
May he be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for his crimes, of which there are many
If CNBC is getting the scoop first, then it likely means that leftists close to the case are the ones who leaked the story.