Sticking to reasoned research, this is a clip of Steven Anderson from his movie Marching to Zion. He says he believes the star of David is the "star of Remphan" because he and interviewee Texe Marrs think Remphan used a hexagram. Problem is, for 8th-century BC Amos and 1st-century AD Stephen there was no cultural hexagram at all and "star" wasn't associated with a polygram shape like it is in English. I have shown that the most likely candidate for the "star of Chiun" (later Remphan) was a snake on a pole (Nehushtan).
The parts about child sacrifice, Moloch, idols, are all accurate, as is the modern Jewish struggle with God as a diverse unity. But people who rely on recent inventions of symbolism for the hexagram as "star of David" and who then claim that ties directly to Remphan-Chiun-Saturn are denying history and getting hooked on a modern distraction started by such alchemists as Paracelsus.
I did downvote u/MW_Freedom (some time after he complained about downvotes) because his tweets do not prove what they intend. A quick followup of any of the details shows they don't actually give evidence they connect to either Amos or Stephen or archaeology, but to medievalists like the Rosicrucians and false links. I'm happy to discuss my link above or details that might support MW's links.
I do grant that an isolated photo (original) of a four- and a six-pointed star shows actual Roman artefacts in Baalbek, Lebanon, but that city was dedicated to Jupiter (wrong planet). The stone probably comes from the 2nd-century AD Temple of Bacchus and the hexagram is isolated and nonnotable. I'll include it in my mental survey of hexagrams having many meanings in antiquity, but there is no evidence this one stone influenced Judaism at any point and certainly not the idolatry of Israel a millennium earlier.
I’ve been trying to get people, at least those with earnest intentions, to start applying good twin/bad twin thinking to all these things we haven’t really been able to discuss. DBG seems like a fair one to question, in the same way one would question Washington or Lincoln.
Bb made a comment a few days ago that I thought was a great concept for a favorite Z word of e… veryone… lately. (Uh. Remember when a movie called “World War Z” came out in 2013? I didn’t watch it, but bet it was full of comms…)
I used to like him, he's been more sketch these last 2 years, I tell people we'll wait to see what the ICJ says about genocide because I'm not taking sides either way. We'll also see how his trip to DC goes, and the Comey indictment. I don't think he's the covenant-with-death type as that would be Barak. I am 100% behind Ron Paul, who has criticized Israel and Netanyahu sharply, and I also respect Ilana Mercer who has done the same as a Jewess.
At the moment it looks like Mossad is worse than CIA, but fact is that none of these leaders can tell us the whole story or admit who's on what side. Whether Trump is nice or mean to someone any given week isn't an indicator. The smoke will clear.
Not related to OP though. We can rail against modern synagogues of satan and modern hexagrams all we like, but when we speak of history there are tests.
Add: I do downvote comments that appear unequivocally racist against Jews generically instead of against specifiable individuals, just as I downvote any other racism. In this thread I see I downvoted a couple comments because I disagree strongly, as stated, and I believe votes should reflect that.
Thank you for that. I gave your comment an upvote, not the downvote, because I appreciate you taking the time to explain where you are coming from.
I want to say I agree with you about racism. I absolutely abhor racism, and I do not like "the Jews" statements. I think it's reckless and it personally offends me because my Lord and Savior is Jewish. I think if you look at my comments on the this post it supports what I'm trying to say (imperfectly as I may have said it):
My intent with posts like the one I started here is to not stray outside of the narrow focus of Jesus Himself when he talks about a "brood of vipers" and "you are of your father the devil". I ONLY mean those who know they are on the side of evil.
I don't think we are as far apart as it might seem on the surface. Here is IMO an interesting thing I did recently. I asked Chat GPT "according to the bible how do we identify the spirit of anti-Christ?". I was surprised at the answer that came back in that I agreed with everything. If you ask it the same question, I would say the answer is a good overview of where I'm coming from.
Lastly, I think this song is a blessing. The lyrics are very dear to me. I love the comments too.
Thanks MW! The reason I step in is that I arrived here to be able to step in when I have research that assists with understanding parts of the problem, and it turns out that because of people's interest my research on Jews comes up more often than other subjects.
In particular, if someone says (some or all) Jews are the synagogue of satan, it's pretty clear that Jesus says the synagogue of satan are not Jews. If someone doubles down by claiming the power to deny self-identified Jews their right of self-identification (usually via Edom or Khazaria), well, that becomes racism and can be called out as such, especially since there is no valid genealogy behind it as if the Jews of Jesus's day ceased to exist organically.
If someone says the star of David is associated with much evil, well, that's got some evidence. But if someone says it's the star of Remphan and/or is directly associated with Saturn worship, that's false Biblically. Does it serve as a new star of Remphan to replace the old, for many people, and do those people worship Saturn by playing up other symbols of Saturn? That does have some evidence, but funny thing is these people never say it that way, they always say uncritically it's the same star of Remphan and it's the same worship of Saturn instead of it being a new installation of the same traps of satan.
So I appreciate what you say and I'll go undo my downvote because of its new context. I tell everyone, "it's the satanists" of every race and nation, and one of the enemy's chief traps is to get us to focus on one of his works at the expense of others getting worse. I'll repeat my link about Revelation 2-3 because it contains the seed of discovering seven works of satan pointed out by the Lord ("synagogue" being one) and not missing any of them. Plus, if the star of Remphan is both the dollar and Big Pharma as I evidence, that's a gigantic entity that is overlooked by the racists.
Sticking to reasoned research, this is a clip of Steven Anderson from his movie Marching to Zion. He says he believes the star of David is the "star of Remphan" because he and interviewee Texe Marrs think Remphan used a hexagram. Problem is, for 8th-century BC Amos and 1st-century AD Stephen there was no cultural hexagram at all and "star" wasn't associated with a polygram shape like it is in English. I have shown that the most likely candidate for the "star of Chiun" (later Remphan) was a snake on a pole (Nehushtan).
The parts about child sacrifice, Moloch, idols, are all accurate, as is the modern Jewish struggle with God as a diverse unity. But people who rely on recent inventions of symbolism for the hexagram as "star of David" and who then claim that ties directly to Remphan-Chiun-Saturn are denying history and getting hooked on a modern distraction started by such alchemists as Paracelsus.
I did downvote u/MW_Freedom (some time after he complained about downvotes) because his tweets do not prove what they intend. A quick followup of any of the details shows they don't actually give evidence they connect to either Amos or Stephen or archaeology, but to medievalists like the Rosicrucians and false links. I'm happy to discuss my link above or details that might support MW's links.
I do grant that an isolated photo (original) of a four- and a six-pointed star shows actual Roman artefacts in Baalbek, Lebanon, but that city was dedicated to Jupiter (wrong planet). The stone probably comes from the 2nd-century AD Temple of Bacchus and the hexagram is isolated and nonnotable. I'll include it in my mental survey of hexagrams having many meanings in antiquity, but there is no evidence this one stone influenced Judaism at any point and certainly not the idolatry of Israel a millennium earlier.
u/AmateurExpert u/DRan u/moodyblue u/MW_Freedom u/pnwhomebrewer u/SirBudLight
Good points.
I’ve been trying to get people, at least those with earnest intentions, to start applying good twin/bad twin thinking to all these things we haven’t really been able to discuss. DBG seems like a fair one to question, in the same way one would question Washington or Lincoln.
Bb made a comment a few days ago that I thought was a great concept for a favorite Z word of e… veryone… lately. (Uh. Remember when a movie called “World War Z” came out in 2013? I didn’t watch it, but bet it was full of comms…)
Anyway, here was the comment: https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0ZcWtii/x/c/4eWcPl98g3Y
Thank you for standing up and making an argument. For reference can you lay out your thoughts on / knowledge of Netanyahu?
I used to like him, he's been more sketch these last 2 years, I tell people we'll wait to see what the ICJ says about genocide because I'm not taking sides either way. We'll also see how his trip to DC goes, and the Comey indictment. I don't think he's the covenant-with-death type as that would be Barak. I am 100% behind Ron Paul, who has criticized Israel and Netanyahu sharply, and I also respect Ilana Mercer who has done the same as a Jewess.
At the moment it looks like Mossad is worse than CIA, but fact is that none of these leaders can tell us the whole story or admit who's on what side. Whether Trump is nice or mean to someone any given week isn't an indicator. The smoke will clear.
Not related to OP though. We can rail against modern synagogues of satan and modern hexagrams all we like, but when we speak of history there are tests.
Add: I do downvote comments that appear unequivocally racist against Jews generically instead of against specifiable individuals, just as I downvote any other racism. In this thread I see I downvoted a couple comments because I disagree strongly, as stated, and I believe votes should reflect that.
Thank you for that. I gave your comment an upvote, not the downvote, because I appreciate you taking the time to explain where you are coming from.
I want to say I agree with you about racism. I absolutely abhor racism, and I do not like "the Jews" statements. I think it's reckless and it personally offends me because my Lord and Savior is Jewish. I think if you look at my comments on the this post it supports what I'm trying to say (imperfectly as I may have said it):
https://greatawakening.win/p/199hgcGl6e/reese-report-the-zionist-occupie/
My intent with posts like the one I started here is to not stray outside of the narrow focus of Jesus Himself when he talks about a "brood of vipers" and "you are of your father the devil". I ONLY mean those who know they are on the side of evil.
I don't think we are as far apart as it might seem on the surface. Here is IMO an interesting thing I did recently. I asked Chat GPT "according to the bible how do we identify the spirit of anti-Christ?". I was surprised at the answer that came back in that I agreed with everything. If you ask it the same question, I would say the answer is a good overview of where I'm coming from.
Lastly, I think this song is a blessing. The lyrics are very dear to me. I love the comments too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8txqw-u4V78
God's blessings to you.
Thanks MW! The reason I step in is that I arrived here to be able to step in when I have research that assists with understanding parts of the problem, and it turns out that because of people's interest my research on Jews comes up more often than other subjects.
In particular, if someone says (some or all) Jews are the synagogue of satan, it's pretty clear that Jesus says the synagogue of satan are not Jews. If someone doubles down by claiming the power to deny self-identified Jews their right of self-identification (usually via Edom or Khazaria), well, that becomes racism and can be called out as such, especially since there is no valid genealogy behind it as if the Jews of Jesus's day ceased to exist organically.
If someone says the star of David is associated with much evil, well, that's got some evidence. But if someone says it's the star of Remphan and/or is directly associated with Saturn worship, that's false Biblically. Does it serve as a new star of Remphan to replace the old, for many people, and do those people worship Saturn by playing up other symbols of Saturn? That does have some evidence, but funny thing is these people never say it that way, they always say uncritically it's the same star of Remphan and it's the same worship of Saturn instead of it being a new installation of the same traps of satan.
So I appreciate what you say and I'll go undo my downvote because of its new context. I tell everyone, "it's the satanists" of every race and nation, and one of the enemy's chief traps is to get us to focus on one of his works at the expense of others getting worse. I'll repeat my link about Revelation 2-3 because it contains the seed of discovering seven works of satan pointed out by the Lord ("synagogue" being one) and not missing any of them. Plus, if the star of Remphan is both the dollar and Big Pharma as I evidence, that's a gigantic entity that is overlooked by the racists.