This is a dry hump. Blurred out the gun? (We see videos all the time (sad to say) of dregs firing guns AT PROPLE on the news.) No flash. What is the purpose? To reinforce (very poorly) that it was NOT the professional sniper on the water tower? Lame game.
Gary Larson probably has a Far Side of this kid cooking an ant with a magnifying glass too... definitely a dangerous character we should all continue to believe was the guy who acted alone and died on that roof...
Candace was sent this video, she's the one who shared it, and her point was there was no way in hell the feds weren't aware of this kid who constantly posted calls for violence. She was talking about the feds covering up what really happened in Butler and what really happened to Charlie.
If anything, this video could be considered incriminating to the Feds. If the video is real (which is highly questionable), it should have put Crooks on the Feds radar.
Of course, I strongly suspect (as many of you do), he was far more than just on the Fed's "radar".
What the 9/11 Pentagon is this bullshit?
Budgets have taken a cut don-cha-know. 😉
They had to use the same potato camera that recorded the missile hitting the pentagon.
This is a dry hump. Blurred out the gun? (We see videos all the time (sad to say) of dregs firing guns AT PROPLE on the news.) No flash. What is the purpose? To reinforce (very poorly) that it was NOT the professional sniper on the water tower? Lame game.
Gary Larson probably has a Far Side of this kid cooking an ant with a magnifying glass too... definitely a dangerous character we should all continue to believe was the guy who acted alone and died on that roof...
There's NOTHING incriminating AT ALL in this diet coke blurred out bullshit...
For all we know he could have been pointing a green dildo at a wmba game on the TV.
That's more believable...
u/#catdance
Back in my day, we used to shoot ducks with light guns in our bedrooms. My how things have changed.
This looks more like a "We need to ban guns!" video than anything else.
Candace was sent this video, she's the one who shared it, and her point was there was no way in hell the feds weren't aware of this kid who constantly posted calls for violence. She was talking about the feds covering up what really happened in Butler and what really happened to Charlie.
Why is that incriminating? It’s dumb to shoot a gun in your room, but this video alone doesn’t connect him to anything.
It's just another psyop to show you "how crazed he is" to push the narrative.
For every assassination or attempted one, there is always patsy, and loose ends.
This must have been back when he had a face...
If anything, this video could be considered incriminating to the Feds. If the video is real (which is highly questionable), it should have put Crooks on the Feds radar.
Of course, I strongly suspect (as many of you do), he was far more than just on the Fed's "radar".