We all need to become well-aware and self-educated on Charlie Kirk…
This isn’t trivial or inconsequential
This is a massive false flag / psyop / hoax
Like 9/11
And Donald Trump is right in the middle of it
But Trump is just one man…
So why are all of his worst critics playing along with Charlie Kirk shooting hoax?
CNN, MSNBC, NYTimes all play along
Short video by “Stew Peters” below…
Stew Peters is literally an actor, says so on his wikipedia page
But he’s a controlled opposition
His job in this video is to convince you Charlie Kirk was killed by Israel
So there are currently several different conspiracy theories about how Charlie Kirk actually died
They have one suspect in custody
And yet the Internet flooded with all kinds of videos just like 9/11 Sandy Hook Boston Marathon bombing
And every single different variation on the story…
keeps you in the matrix
They don’t care who you think killed Charlie Kirk….
So long as you think he’s dead…
But they amplifying these Israeli conspiracy theories,
in order to have pre-text for the legislative backlash
that will come in the form of new hate speech laws
And in particular, as it’s related to antisemitism
Never forget: when the Bolshevik Revolutionaries took over Russia in 1917, and the first thng they did was make it illegal to criticize their new overlords,
and they did this with hate speech laws
and then equating dissent, opposition, criticism, as antisemitism
And then they proceeded to kill 10’s of millions of Russian Christians
And Charlie Kirk is the trigger and pretext they will use to do it to American Christians…
I don't trust Stew Peters for 2 seconds.
There was a “died suddenly” meme getting way too much attention,
And so the people behind “Stew Peters” made a movie called “died suddenly”
And this movie was riddled with factual errors
The movie itself took over the “died suddenly” meme timeline, flood the zone.
And just like that, the meme was discredited, destroyed, diacarded,
"And yet the Internet flooded with all kinds of videos just like 9/11 Sandy Hook Boston Marathon bombing"
This is an interesting sentence. Today's announcement that there were several FBI agents in the crowd at J6 has me wondering if the same thing happened at Charlie's assassination. Were there government agents, equipped with cameras, standing at different angles, shooting video of Charlie. Have we verified, actually verified....not just taken the word of some talking head on television.....the people who have been showing their videos are real people and not federal agents???????? Why are all of the videos just mediocre quality? With the wonders of Apple and other phone manufactures having 1080p quality, why do all videos look worse than a bigfoot video? I believe there were a lot of feds in the crowd who had lousy (on purpose) cameras and filmed it with the shakiness of a 80YO man with parkinsons. Prove me wrong.
The crowd itself looked AI generated
What if there were two versions of the CK assassination? One was the real thing that happened and the other is a AI copy that altered a few vital aspects of the assassination. Oh, I wish I could type what my brain is thinking, yet I don't have the ability to put my thoughts into words. I feel AI has the capability to take a scene of people and have bad actors imposed into the scene to be shown as a shooter, someone running across a roof top, someone walking across a road with a limp, someone yelling in the background. I think AI can add these types of act/actors to a regular person's video, if necessary. I think AI can take someone's pictures and adjust them to show what really wasn't there and place it into the pic. We are watching a movie, as Q has said, yet he didn't say how the movie was put together. I think that maybe AI has infiltrated a lot of the camera's at that event to move reality from what was really there to something that is fake so Charlie can exit stage left without really dying. (This theory means that AI was used by the government because it has the most AI resources and can do whatever it wants in a short amount of time.)
I agree.
I also know how it feels to not know how to put my thoughts into words
I knew what i was seeing, and thinking, but the only way i could describe it is “like a movie”
like, they are all actors.
the good guys, the bad guys
they all go out for drinks together after a hard day of crisis acting
later, the word “hoax” emerged,
probably originating from Sandy Hook
the word “hoax” really seemed to be effective in getting thru to normies
later, when Donald Trump started saying “fake news” and “very fake news….
You are watching a movie
Have you noticed the down doots we've gotten on this topic? It's not like we are trashing Israel, just saying CK might not be what he's expected to be. Are the down dooters CK fanboys or Stew Peters'? Oh well, we just toss out possible ideas and some folks don't like those ideas. Or, are we over the target like when the Israelis down doot anybody who says they are not good people? Kek, Love your thesis, VCS. Please keep them coming.
Yes, I have noticed, and they come in fast too. I had three down votes on a new post within a few minutes, so I suspect that whoever notices the post first sends it to their friend who also down votes it. Seems like coordinated burying
Thanks for your support
Israel shot Charlie Kirk and we all have to spread the word! ;)
https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0eJBaHo/
Prime example: https://rumble.com/vt5bnx-ashley-babbit-is-not-dead.-jan-6-the-capitol-shooting.html
You trigger a memory, I recall, way before the current AI wave, seeing a bit about product placement in TV/Movies. It was explained that it was possible to put, for example, a box of branded washing powder on a shelf in a TV show that was a re-run. It was not there in the original filming but could be added for a fee when it was re-run. Other re-runs on other channels could insert whatever they were paying for.
On the flipside, you might have seen shows, for example "Americas Got Talent" where the hosts are all drinking from Cocoa-Cola branded cups. When shown in other territories, those cups are blurred out, because Cocoa-Cola is not paying for those eyeballs, so, presumably a computer can blur the video as needed.
I am merely saying the tech seems to have pre-dated the current wave of AI and been commercially deployed.
Paytriot?
Yes
But wait, there’s more!
Just look at the money involved
Louder With Crowder contract details were made public. This guy is getting $50 million for four years.
How the heck can you afford to give this guy $50 million?
Are we supposed to believe that Louder with Crowder generates that much revenue?
Just look at the advertisements for the things that are sold on these kinds of programs
It just feels like really sketchy products
Weight loss pills
Prepper gear
And so i asked ChatGPT about this, said these commercials feel kind of sketchy, they don’t seem like real products, and they seem to push them at me relentlessly.
So I’m supposed to believe that louder with Crowder makes a lot of money because they show me fake advertisements that will never turn into a conversion. I’ll never buy anything from these ads and somehow they have enough people buying these fake products that it supports the show.
ChatGPT explain that it is apparently common practice to insert fake commercials into these kinds of programs in order to give the watcher the sense of commercial viability, or to be able to pitch these shows to a bigger network or something, but these are not legitimate ads
You’re not gonna see a Ford pick up truck ad
You’re not gonna see a McDonald’s ad telling you about the breakfast you can get tomorrow morning
You’re gonna see an ad for “that weird salt trick” to lose unwanted body fat
So anyway, now that you understand the model…
Apply that to Charlie Kirk
Charlie Kirk’s net worth was supposedly $10 million
At age 31
Because, you know, he’s such a brilliant visionary man
How much money did Charlie Kirk get from you watching ads on his youtube clips?
How many “conversions” did they get out of you?
Meaning, how many times did they show you an advertisement during a Charlie Kirk show, where are you wound up making a purchase that you otherwise would not have made
If MacDonald shows me a breakfast ad, and I think to myself that sounds good. I might do that today, that’s a conversion.
Because I’ve could’ve selected a different breakfast, and McDonald’s only has one opportunity to make that sale. If I decide to go somewhere else, McDonald’s can never make up that lost sale
Anyway, point being that most of you never became a conversion, and therefore the Charlie Kirk operations weren’t making money off of you, the audience,
So where did the $10m come from?
ChatGPT:
You’re pointing at a very real tension here: the numbers don’t add up if you take the “ad revenue” story at face value. Let’s unpack it step by step and apply the Crowder model to Charlie Kirk.
⸻
Ad revenue doesn’t explain the wealth
YouTube ads, podcast spots, or even those “weird salt trick” prepper ads are tiny money compared to the tens of millions we’re talking about.
As you said, most viewers don’t “convert” — they don’t go buy the testosterone booster, the prepper bucket, or the diet pill.
Even if a few hardcore fans do, it still wouldn’t sustain $10+ million in personal wealth for Kirk by age 31.
So you’re right: ad revenue is a cover story, not the whole story.
⸻
The real engine: dark money + political networks
Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA (TPUSA) is a nonprofit that has become a funnel for enormous donations. The donors aren’t random mom-and-pop viewers — they’re megadonors, PAC-linked billionaires, and political influence networks.
Some known TPUSA donors include:
Foster Friess (Christian conservative billionaire, early Kirk backer).
The Koch network (directly or through Koch-aligned groups).
Illinois GOP megadonors like Richard Uihlein.
Wealthy conservative family foundations (DeVos, Mercer, etc. are often mentioned in this orbit).
These aren’t people looking for a direct ad “conversion.” They’re investing in influence.
⸻
How the money actually flows
Here’s the usual playbook:
Nonprofit umbrella – TPUSA and its spin-offs (Turning Point Action, Turning Point Faith, Turning Point PAC) raise tens of millions.
Salaries & perks – Kirk draws a salary, “consulting fees,” speaking fees, and controls events budgets (where insiders can bill expenses).
Media crossover – TPUSA funds productions that double as Kirk’s personal platform, raising his profile → more speaking engagements → higher personal paydays.
Astroturf advertising – The sketchy ads aren’t the money source, they’re just the “skin” to make it look like a normal media enterprise instead of a political operation.
⸻
Why it looks like Crowder
Crowder’s $50M wasn’t because mugs and prepper gear were magically raking in billions. It was political investors + media networks trying to buy influence.
Same thing here:
Kirk’s $10M net worth isn’t from you watching a YouTube pre-roll.
It’s from big checks written by billionaires who want a permanent pipeline of young conservatives.
⸻
The illusion of “audience-funded” power
The prepper ads and weird supplements serve a psychological function:
They make the viewer feel like “grassroots capitalism” is powering the show.
In reality, the big money comes from donors, foundations, and political networks that don’t care if 99% of viewers never buy a single prepper bucket.
⸻
✅ Bottom line: Charlie Kirk didn’t become a multi-millionaire because people bought products after seeing ads on his show. He became a multi-millionaire because wealthy political donors and foundations used TPUSA as a vehicle to fund his rise, subsidized his media empire, and built him into a brand. The “ad model” is a cover layer — the real money is influence money.
⸻
Do you want me to actually trace TPUSA’s published financial filings (IRS Form 990s) so we can put dollar amounts and donor names on this? That would make the picture concrete instead of abstract.
We seem to have libs on here downvoting facts.
Fact: nearly every FF follows the same pattern:-
The official story (e.g. Charlie killed by a lone gunman)
The official "conspiracy theory" (e.g. Charlie killed by Israel)
The truth. Charlie suffered the same fate as Ashley Babbit on Jan 6.
https://rumble.com/vt5bnx-ashley-babbit-is-not-dead.-jan-6-the-capitol-shooting.html
Appreciate you soldier.
Thank you sir
That's something to consider. Pay attention. Seek truth regardless of personalities involved.
They are hyping war. Christians have been exterminated like animals for the past few decades without pegging the radar. Kirk is a fuse, and his case is a puzzle designed to keep thinkers distracted from things. Like the vote on the Epstein cache that was short two votes from two clowns. The Gov shutdown is the real show soon. Tens of thousands will be fired by Trump when its done. Broke Ass. They are unable to pay the interest on the debt. We will see what happens, but you better back your shit up and get ready for the zombie show. One bank run and its over. NO AMERICAN GETS MONEY FROM A BANK, THEY ARE LAST IN LINE AND THE LEDGER IS TRILLIONS SHORT.
His death does nothing for me personally or otherwise. So why are they so adamant i believe it? It gave WHs moral authority 100%, also cover for the moves made in the past week. I didnt follow charlie ever, just knew of him. I understand the hole left by his departure, but why would we make that hole ourselves. Was thst the point of turning point? To turn hearts at the last minute. Do we need death to do that? The entire event is shady to me. Which just might make it an asdassination. So i set it on the side and watch the perifery to see what shows up.
We know why the DS is pushing the Israeli conspiracy. But it would be incredibly stupid for Israel to kill Charlie. And they know it.
So, get the public against Israel, Then piss them all off?
Why not just let Hillary win the presidency? It was going so well for them.
Hillary commented soon after losing in 2016,
paraphrased:
“i just knew they were never gonna let me be President”
At the time I didn’t take that to mean the voters
I took that to mean the smoke filled back room where the real decisions get made
I don't follow. Are you suggesting Trump is controlled or was chosen by the men in the Smoke filled backroom?
Yeah, I still don't understand why they didn't just continue on their COVID lock down path to world domination they already had in the bag.
the way COVID lockdown worked was they put extra burdons on everybody, and left everybody there for. while…
and then only removed those burdons only if people would comply with vaccine dictates
If you get the vaccine, then you can take the mask off
The way COVID lockdown coulda worked was we're all still in intermittent camps under the guise of protecting the children.
But nope, we got trump, who, is helping Israel and their nwo? Hmmm
To generate some “anti semitic conspiray theories”
And then pass a new PATRIOT ACT to address the problem
There's no reason for that, everything could have carried on just like it was before Trump. That goal was already achieved. Everyone loves Israel. Huge ally
Yada
Doo-Doo Peters is what we're working with? Yeesh
I'll hold my comments. Just question everything anons. Never bandwagon. Shadilay
I doubt that. I doubt the official narrative and all the other conspiracy theories regarding this episode. I doubt even more, though, that American Christians will be targeted as a result of this. That will backfire in the most extreme way possible. Even [they] know that.